Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's Something in thw Water
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/opinion/83635132.html?corder=reverse ^ | John Wennersten

Posted on 03/29/2010 5:42:06 AM PDT by truthfinder9

Scientists now tell us there is something in our waters that we least expected.

That “something” is a class of chemicals called endocrine disruptors, and Dr. Vicki Blazer, a fisheries biologist at the United States Geological Survey, thinks the chemicals are responsible for the high concentrations of intersex fish found in the Potomac, and other rivers in the mid-Atlantic.

The chemicals also prove a threat to human health, but a bit of explanation, first.

Our body’s endocrine system is a complex network of glands and hormones that regulate growth, development, and the operation of various organs. The endocrine glands (for example the thyroid, adrenal, pancreas, testes, ovaries and pituitary glands) release hormones that act as chemical messengers and regulate many life functions.

Endocrine disrupters are chemicals that interfere with this system, by either acting like a hormone, or blocking a hormone’s function. They can be natural, but many are man-made such as PCBs, dioxin, DDT and other pesticides, pharmaceuticals and plasticizers. They are found in many products, including plastic bottles, metal food cans, detergents, flame retardants, food, toys, cosmetics and pesticides. They enter the environment and are now commonly found in our streams, rivers, bays and oceans, where scientists are observing problems.

For example, Blazer has found male smallmouth bass with both male and female sex organs attempting to lay eggs. Coincidentally, estrogen levels from disposed drugs such as birth control pills and urine from hormone-treated livestock have increased in waters.

In 2003, these disturbing findings were reported in the upper reaches of the Potomac River. Since then, endocrine disruptors and their effects on fish have been reported throughout the mid-Atlantic.

Environmental scientist Eugene P. Macri reports that the Susquehanna is a “toxic soup” with chemicals and endocrine disruptors. Environmental agencies in Pennsylvania have failed to see the cumulative effects of endocrine disruptors in the Susquehanna watershed, Macri argues.

“Contrary to the myth (about the river’s good health). … the Susquehanna is a dying ecosystem.”

These chemicals are rooted in our lifestyle choices,” Blazer said. For example, virtually all personal care products contain phthalates, which cause sex problems in frogs and may damage the workings of the human endocrine system.

Scientists are quick to point out that with new pollutants entering our water systems every day, and we really don’t know what safe levels are.

“This is the dilemma when we look at toxins in the water at parts per billion,” said Dr. Robert Lawrence of the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. “We are beginning to see a disturbing amount of genital abnormalities in male babies and impaired fertility influenced by endocrine disruptors.”

Right now, “the burden of proof is on those who say that levels of endocrine disruptors in the water are too low to be harmful. We need to take into account that humans are long-lived species and endocrine disruptors have a capacity to have synergy with other toxins and become harmful over time. Parents should be very careful in terms of what kind of drinking water they give to their young children.”

Lawrence added that we need strict law enforcement procedures for water treatment, not mere monitoring.

“Ten new chemicals per day are being manufactured globally that end up in our water systems. Testing can’t keep up. It’s scary, very scary.”

The situation won’t improve unless there is a major public outcry against our rivers becoming toxic chemical waterways. Unless we firmly control our drinkable, fishable and swimmable waters, we may face frightening consequences as a species. The effects of endocrine disruptors, so evident in fish, can be extrapolated to the human body. Thus in the future impaired waters may in turn lead to impaired people.

John R. Wennersten is the author of numerous books on the Chesapeake Bay and regional environments in the Mid-Atlantic. This column is distributed by Bay Journal News Service.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: chemicals; fish; health; nowinthe; waterpollution

1 posted on 03/29/2010 5:42:06 AM PDT by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

As the amphibian loss already declared, THIS is what
is important, not pseudoglobal warming.


2 posted on 03/29/2010 5:46:10 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Whatever happened to our Purity of Essence?


3 posted on 03/29/2010 5:46:17 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

It’s the Fluoride, take cover!


4 posted on 03/29/2010 5:47:26 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Right now, “the burden of proof is on those who say that levels of endocrine disruptors in the water are too low to be harmful.

No its not...it is up to this guy to prove that such tiny concentrations of chemicals are harmful.

He can't, by the way. All they wish to do is cripple assorted industries and raise the cost of our water to astronomical heights (along with energy and food).

5 posted on 03/29/2010 5:50:38 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster

www.fluoridealert.org

As mentioned before, the Germans did use fluoride to sedate people.


6 posted on 03/29/2010 5:51:26 AM PDT by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
I knew it! I knew it! I knew there was something in the water that we have this trend of feminised men and metrosexuals, and the gub/mint is behind it! (J/K, for those to whom it's not obvious)
7 posted on 03/29/2010 5:53:18 AM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Now we know why most densely populated areas vote Dem. Men & Women with each others’ hormones....


8 posted on 03/29/2010 5:56:04 AM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

it may not be a joke...


9 posted on 03/29/2010 5:56:35 AM PDT by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Wow! The Romans killed themselves with lead poisoning. We’re doing it with PLASTIC?


10 posted on 03/29/2010 5:57:27 AM PDT by Huebolt (Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

I agree, but of course am not a scientist and can’t prove it.


11 posted on 03/29/2010 5:59:40 AM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Huebolt

It’s probably the birthcontrol pills and steroids.


12 posted on 03/29/2010 6:01:16 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

What ever it takes to perpetuate junk science. The key is this is an “opinion” piece and is using the green code words “lifestyle choices”. We can disregard the remainder of the article. This joke wants into our personal lives and is willing to tell any lie necessary.


13 posted on 03/29/2010 6:01:42 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huebolt
Well, Mr Robinson did tell Dustin Hoffman "plastic". Way back in the Sicties, when men started wearing long hair and beads around their necks, and ruffles on their shirts.
14 posted on 03/29/2010 6:01:50 AM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Huebolt

Some plastics, anyway. http://www.badplastics.com/


15 posted on 03/29/2010 6:03:15 AM PDT by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

See, you’ve been so put off by the radical enviros that you’re willing to drink polluted water. Fundie Alert.


16 posted on 03/29/2010 6:05:23 AM PDT by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

I’ve been saying for years that it’s all the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the water that causes all these problems...


17 posted on 03/29/2010 6:09:42 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Exactly what do you mean by “Fundie Alert”? You clearly couldn’t mean me as I have never been a Fundamentalist Christian or fundamentalist anything else. I am a pragmatic follower of the money. If you are referring to the perverts who keep spreading this junk science religion of theirs, then terms like Fundie Green, Fundie Libtard, or Fundie Jackass would all apply to them.


18 posted on 03/29/2010 6:21:45 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; A.Hun
A acquaintance of mine has been reviewing the research on abnormalities on sexual physiology in fish and amphibians in California. He's seeing nontraditional (nonmonotonic) dose response curves, possibly because low concentrations of different endocrine disruptors are synergistic.

He said nobody "wants" to look at the effects of contamination from sewage sludge from human populations where there's a lot of females on synthetic sex hormones. That would be OC's and HRT.

He's encountered political/ideological pressure to minimize such findings. Nobody "wants" to find that oral contraceptives are queering the fish. Or that human males may be skewed prenatally or in early childhood by exposure to water containing exoestrogens.

19 posted on 03/29/2010 6:27:12 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Sorry: Tag-line presently at the dry cleaners. Please find suitable bumper-sticker instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

In a highly populated are like the Potomac region, birth control pills, other female hormone replacement drugs would seem to be more likely the cause. But no one has pointed a finger at this problem. Agriculture has been the kicking post for all these problems. I wonder if this has anything to do with all the gay people all over television......(half way sarcastic)


20 posted on 03/29/2010 6:35:42 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Didn’t this issue pop up several years ago? And wasn’t it disproved in short order?

Oh, that’s right. Research funding time again.


21 posted on 03/29/2010 6:42:09 AM PDT by CPOSharky (What outrage will the administration foist upon We the People that will be the last straw?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

A short while ago another report cited the amounts of prescription drugs in the water. This report, outside plastics, may largely deal with results of a overly sensualized society in the post-Christian West. 98 percent of American women use some form of contraception during their lives, and 1 out of 4 with STDS with many on drugs, while 1 out of 3 pregnancies end in abortion, with 40 percent of American women having had abortions.

Worse, there’s no water in Hell.


22 posted on 03/29/2010 6:49:04 AM PDT by daniel1212 ("Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I knew it... It’s the water in Washington DC, that robs Democrats of their minds, and Republicans of their spines!


23 posted on 03/29/2010 7:10:15 AM PDT by FiddlePig (truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
and ruffles on their shirts.

Hey dude! I love my ruffled shirt...and beads.

(JK, believe me!)

24 posted on 03/29/2010 7:31:57 AM PDT by Huebolt (Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

“Whatever happened to our Purity of Essence?”

Mandrake, your average Commie could care less about the sanctity of our precious bodily fluids ;-).


25 posted on 03/29/2010 7:33:10 AM PDT by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

For example, Blazer has found male smallmouth bass with both male and female sex organs attempting to lay eggs.
NEVER take your fish to California they will never be the same.


26 posted on 03/29/2010 8:29:26 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

They also report that all sources of drinking water contains birth control chemicals. Probably the source of decreased birth rates and increased numbers of homosexuals from the estrogen changing our children’s sexual orientation.


27 posted on 03/29/2010 9:29:12 AM PDT by macglencoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: macglencoe

62% of the 62 million women aged 15–44 are currently using a contraceptive method (30% the pill, 27% male or female tubal sterilization)

The typical U.S. woman wants only 2 children. To achieve this goal, she must use contraceptives for roughly 3 decades.

Only 5% of U.S. Women are virgins. Sources and more stats at http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html


28 posted on 03/29/2010 12:33:03 PM PDT by daniel1212 ("Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Indian Country Today
29 posted on 03/29/2010 12:33:44 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; macglencoe

This “problem” is entirely pushed by Environmental Working Group, a Soros funded bunch of lunatics.

Anything measured in parts per billion in the water is nothing to be concerned with. Anything in parts per trillion (many of these chemicals in the water fall in this category) is a joke.

Just because traces of hormones (endocrine disrupters) are measurable in the water these fish are in, do not mean the two are related. These people would prefer massive regulation to eliminate any trace of chemicals in water, whether there is a threat or not.

This is not about our health, or the health of fish.


30 posted on 03/29/2010 12:55:40 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; macglencoe
"The 'problem' is entirely pushed by Environmental Working Group..."

No, that's not true. The problem is that male fish and male amphibians are developing eggs and egg proteins in their testes, that this phenomenon is expanding, that it has been documented in hundreds of major watersheds in Europe, North America and elsewhere, and that a degradation of male reproductive anatomy and physiology may be weakening binary sexual differentiation in other phyla as well.

Soros' Environmental Working Group may be "pushing" the idea that this is caused by RightWingitude or Republicoplastics or poly-Bushinated Bushphenyls, but they are NOT advancing the bothersome hypothesis that they are caused (in part) by synthetic female hormone effluents related to oral contraceptives.

If I had money (which I don't) I would place a sure bet that the Soros groups are majorly invested in hormonal contraceptives, and the universal acceptance thereof.

31 posted on 03/29/2010 1:13:18 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (" I never saw a more Spreading lot of animals in my life, and in all the wrong places." - Eeyore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Check out Eugene P. Macri’s blog......

http://macrisplace.blogspot.com/2007/04/rush-limbaugh-greatest-idiot-ever.html

Dr.Blazer’s deductions seem to involve a very small number of fish...

http://www.zoominfo.com/Search/ReferencesView.aspx?PersonID=185356286&lastName=Blazer&firstName=Vicki&searchSource=page&page=5

If you dig deep enough, environuts are behind this, I guarantee. You should question even the basic research...just like global warming. Zealous tree huggers are everywhere in the universities and government agencies.

Remember...

1 ppm = one drop in 13 gallons

1 ppb = one drop in 13,000 gallons

1ppt = one drop in 13,000,000 gallons

If history is any guide, they won’t even publish the concentrations of the pollutants.

I’m not trying to diminish your concerns, just giving you a heads up!


32 posted on 03/29/2010 2:59:11 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson