Skip to comments.Former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland Admits He's Gay
Posted on 03/29/2010 2:17:12 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
A Roman Catholic archbishop who resigned in 2002 over a sex and financial scandal involving a man has written a memoir that describes how he struggled with being gay.
Archbishop Rembert Weakland, former head of the Milwaukee archdiocese, "is up front about his homosexuality in a church that preferred to ignore gays," Publisher's Weekly wrote in a review Monday.
The book, "A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church: Memoirs of a Catholic Archbishop," is set to be released in June and is described by the publisher as a self-examination by Weakland of his "psychological, spiritual and sexual growth."
The Vatican says that men with "deep-seated" attraction to other men should not be ordained.
Weakland stepped down quickly after Paul Marcoux, a former Marquette University theology student, revealed in May 2002 that he was paid $450,000 to settle a sexual assault claim he made against the archbishop more than two decades earlier. The money came from the archdiocese.
Marcoux went public at the height of anger over the clergy sex abuse crisis, when Catholics and others were demanding that dioceses reveal the extent of molestation by clergy and how much had been confidentially spent to settle claims.
Weakland denied ever assaulting anyone. He apologized for concealing the payment.
In an August 1980 letter that was obtained by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Weakland said he was in emotional turmoil over Marcoux and signed the letter, "I love you."
"During the last months, I have come to know how strained I was, tense, pensive, without much joy," Weakland wrote. "I felt like the world's worst hypocrite. So gradually I came back to the importance of celibacy in my life."
The revelations rocked the Milwaukee archdiocese, which Weakland had led since 1977. But when he publicly read a letter of apology for the scandal, Milwaukee parishioners gave him a a standing ovation.
The Archdiocese of Milwaukee released a public statement last week alerting local Catholics that the book is soon to be published and that it deals in part with Weakland's relationship with Marcoux and the scandal.
"Some people will be angry about the book, others will support it," the archdiocese said.
Weakland, who has been a hero for liberal Catholics because of his work on social justice and other issues, will also address in the memoirs his failures to stop abusive priests.
In a videotaped deposition released last November, Weakland admitted returning guilty priests to active ministry without alerting parishioners or police.
Advocates for abuse victims said that Weakland's cover up of his own sexual activity was part of a pattern of secrecy that included concealing the criminal behavior of child molesters.
The archbishop did not respond Monday to an e-mail request for comment. Weakland, a Benedictine, plans to move to St. Mary's Abbey in Morristown, N.J., this summer.
U.S. Catholics have long debated whether the priesthood had become a predominantly gay vocation. Estimates vary from 25 percent to 50 percent, according to a review of research on the issue by the Rev. Donald Cozzens, author of "The Changing Face of the Priesthood."
Cozzens, a former seminary rector, said in an interview that Weakland's acknowledgment of his sexual orientation "cuts into the denial that relatively few priests or bishops are gay."
But Russell Shaw, a former spokesman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, questioned whether the book would have much impact.
"That one controversial archbishop acknowledges what everybody's known for several years," Shaw said, "I don't think that's going to make any big difference."
He was Annibale Bugnini’s right hand man, when he created the new Mass. He was the only other person to attend all the tests.
So does George Takei!
It seems blatantly obvious that the Catholic church environment attracts homosexuals and pedophiles into their priesthood.
Hardly breaking news.
What a fruit cup
Bingo! That's the only reason I posted this article. While I respect the church and its traditions, it's clear to me that the current Pope needs to resign and that they need to allow priests to marry so they can clean house of homosexuals and pedophiles.
Can someone who is Catholic please explain to me how it is that if you are celebate, you can be either straight or gay. It seems that if you give up sex, then it is a non issue.
The Catholic Church needs a better vetting process for priests, or demand that they marry and not other men. :)
Logic dictates that the celibate priesthood is a good hiding-place for men who are disinterested in women, and want to to avoid answering questions about their lack of interest in the fairer sex.
The RCC hardly ignores gays. Every male music director I’ve ever met is obviously homosexual. Homosexual men were one of the few demographics able to ‘handle’ the celibacy requirement to be a priest - no sexual attraction to women, no temptation to marry. Going after other boys and young men, however...
“Social Justice”: A term, like “gay”, whose meaning has been perverted.
I think that probably the worst single influence on the Church in America was Cardinal Bernardin, because he was extremely bright and subtle about his constant undermining of the Church. He led a lot of bishops astray.
Rembert Weakland did a considerable damage too, but frankly the guy was a jerk, not much good at hiding his dissident views. It was no surprise when that scandal broke, because it had long been pretty obvious what he was.
But at least it enabled the Vatican to force him to step down.
>> It seems blatantly obvious that the Catholic church environment attracts homosexuals and pedophiles into their priesthood.
Bingo! That’s the only reason I posted this article. While I respect the church and its traditions, it’s clear to me that the current Pope needs to resign and that they need to allow priests to marry so they can clean house of homosexuals and pedophiles. <<
Yep, and would it suprise you that the convents have a statisically larger number of lesbians than the average population, for the exact same reasons. Though because the ways a woman’s sex drive differs from men’s the number of abuse cases of priests (men) vs. nuns (women) is lower, thoguh it is still a very serious problem.
Delbarton, the highschool this Abbey is at, sent out a letter last year, that he Wasn't going to be there. I wonder if he is after all.
I ain’t a Roman Catholic, nor (obviously) do I agree with all their theology, but I must denounce this as a red herring. Lutherans, who do allow ministers to marry, see about the same rate of problems in their ministry.
>> Logic dictates that the celibate priesthood is a good hiding-place for men who are disinterested in women, and want to to avoid answering questions about their lack of interest in the fairer sex.
And Nunneries for the same reason for the opposite sex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.