Skip to comments.Gay OK for a president
Posted on 03/30/2010 3:10:35 PM PDT by presidio9
Half of Americans say they are fine with an openly gay president -- and they're even hotter on a lesbian Miss America or homosexual Super Bowl quarterback, according to a poll released yesterday.
Fifty percent of those questioned by the 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair survey said they'd have no problem with a gay commander in chief.
Even more said they'd support a gay Miss America or NFL quarterback.
The poll also found:
* More people define being rich as earning at least $300,000 a year.
* The director who most would chose to direct a movie of their life is Steven Spielberg. The not-so-close second was Quentin Tarantino, followed by Woody Allen.
* Sex addiction is bunk, according to
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I don’t understand the point of the Lindsey Graham picture. Please explain.
2. No marxists.
3. No blacks
4. No hispanics
5. No RINO's
6. No leftists
7. No Dims
8. No Atheists or Agnostics
9. No muslims
The “Progressives” in our audience are going to read your post and think you are saying you’d never vote for a black candidate. That’s not what you meant to say, right?
Ambidexterous Yanks pitching prospect Pat Venditte (the first in ML history) is throwing better than that with either hand tonight.
Heh...I’m also ambidextrous and use it to advantage in lots of sports.
My hypothetical was stated poorly. My point was that a candidate could score 99% on a conservative scorecard and the one point missing would be his/her sexual orientation. I was just wondering if that would be a deal killer for most here.
I would be inclined to accept 99% of what I’m looking for every time. That’s a theoretical situation in which I would probably vote for a homosexual. This is purely academic, I’m not campaigning for Richard Simmons for POTUS as some here seem to think.
That’s all well and good, but if you are assuming (even hypothetically) that the is a homosexual on this planet who could be counted on the to be a dependable Republican president, you’ve been brainwashed by liberals. You probably also think that men and women think and solve problems exactly the same way, and the only difference is genetalia. Here is a non-politically correct fact (but a fact none the less): There is no scientific basis whatsoever for the idea that homosexuality is innate. It is an aquired mental illness. Period. Any arguments to that fact are wishful thinking. Now, I have had many wonderful gay friends, and even two close family members, so please accept that I have nothing personal against homosexuality. What I’m saying is that if we ever get to the point where the only dependably conservative candidate we can come up with is gay, then we might as well surrender to the terrorists, because we’ve obviously already surrendered to the liberals and lost already.
More proof that I don't live in America, I live in New York City. $300K makes you upper middle class, at best.
Backfield in motion, I'm gonna penis, er, penalize you!
You cannot possibly be advocating for an all-white “racially pure” America, can you? Because if you are, that isn’t conservative, it’s bat sh*t crazy. Especially when you consider that white births will be a minority by 2012.
It sounds like you want a Christian version of Iran. While we’re at it, why don’t we just stone our women or sell our daughters into slavery? I mean, Christ himself didn’t try and save the errant thief on the cross next to him, yet you seem to think you’re smarter than he is so sure, take out the agnostics and atheists too. That whole “vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord thing” ... yeah, you can ignore that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.