Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
he adopted the argument of dissenting Justices in that case, that the Court's upholding of a law prohibiting possession of firearms by felons implied that the Court did not consider that laws infringing the right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms should be subject to a strict scrutiny standard of review.

Wow, a new judicial standard. If you don't agree with the winning side of a Supreme Court decision, just adopt the losing side's argument.

This needs to be smacked down by the USSC. This is lunacy.

14 posted on 03/31/2010 4:01:22 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exit82

“If you don’t agree with the winning side of a Supreme Court decision, just adopt the losing side’s argument.”

It’s not unusual for federal district and appelate courts to thumb their Marxist noses at Supreme Court decisions that favor individual liberty and make rulings based on opinions of far left lunatics. Then the USSC has to revisit its previous rulings and smack down the lower courts. (See Rapanos v US as one example)

It’s situations like this where congress must use its impeachment powers and remove these black-robed communists from the bench.


18 posted on 03/31/2010 5:13:54 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson