Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc1019

In my post (#4) I didn’t lay down my position regarding the issue of abortion. I was commenting on the judge’s retort to Roeder that the courtroom was not a place for him to stand on his “soapbox” and give his political position regarding abortion. My comment was aimed at pointing out that people who are against abortion, especially late-term abortion, have not been given a “soapbox” in which to present arguments against abortion.

As for my position? I am against the use of abortion as a means of birth control. And, I am stridently against the use of late-term abortion as IMHO this is nothing short of murder. The doctors who perform this “procedure” should be arrested, tried, and convicted of murder, as should be the women who allow the procedure to performed upon them. I can understand what Roeder did, and why. But, I do not condone the taking of another’s life through murder.


39 posted on 04/01/2010 8:31:15 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad

Thank you for your response. Now your comment makes sense to me. Again, thanks for taking the time to explaining it to me.

Not that it would matter to you, coming from a drive by questioner, but I agree with you 100%.


42 posted on 04/01/2010 8:45:06 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson