Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Job Creation Expected In March As Recovery Builds
AP via Yahoo News ^ | 2 Apr 2010 | Christopher S. Rugaber and Tali Arbel

Posted on 04/02/2010 3:35:41 AM PDT by edpc

WASHINGTON – The economy is likely to have added jobs last month for only the second time since the recession began 27 months ago.

That, economists say, would mark a significant turning point in the recovery. It would mean the worst is over and that more job creation could be on the way in the months ahead. But, it does not mean enough new jobs are being created to bring down the unemployment rate.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: business; economy; jobs; unemployment
As many as 100,000 of the job gains could reflect temporary hiring for the U.S. Census. Roughly 50,000 more might simply be a rebound from February, when massive snowstorms on the East Coast kept some workers off company payrolls.

That would leave a respectable 40,000 new jobs created by private employers. Much of the gains are likely to come from the health care and temporary help industries.

Only the AP would consider a paltry 40K gain "respectable." I see they're still blaming the weather for the early year numbers.

1 posted on 04/02/2010 3:35:43 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edpc

Choco Rations have increased from 20 to 25 grams!/s


2 posted on 04/02/2010 3:38:07 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

**Rolling Eyes** Those numbers are highly anemic, seasonal non-farm jobs that always pick up this time of the year, and drop in November. It’s construction. Obama didn’t make the winter go away.


3 posted on 04/02/2010 3:43:40 AM PDT by cake_crumb (RR on ObieCare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs&feature=player_embedded#)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The unemployment rate is forecast to stay at 9.7 percent for the third straight month, according to economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters

Given the number of new people entering the workforce every month, this does not seem possible. I cannot imagine the manipulation that must be taking place. Makes Enron accounting look amateurish.

4 posted on 04/02/2010 3:48:50 AM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Census hiring to lift March payrolls
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1715009520100402?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews


5 posted on 04/02/2010 3:49:33 AM PDT by TSgt (When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Nice. Jobs that produce nothing being paid for with borrowed money.


6 posted on 04/02/2010 3:52:56 AM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edpc

I don’t know what planet these guys are on, but Scotty forgot to beam them up...

I guess we’ll have to endure seeing the word “unexpected” again in a month when their magical recovery fails to materialize for the upteenth time.


7 posted on 04/02/2010 3:55:34 AM PDT by kamikaze2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Happy Days Are Here Again! Brother can you spare a dime?


8 posted on 04/02/2010 3:55:45 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Mmm-hmm. Remember during the Bush years when any positive employment news whatsoever was met with the criticism, "Well yeah, but all we're doing is replacing high paying professional jobs with part-time burger-flipping jobs"?

As if that's not the case now?! How many people who have been laid-off recently actually found a new job making equal or better pay than the one they were laid-off from?

I lost my job last fall, still have had no luck finding anything, and I have no realistic hope whatsosever of ever again earning the kind of 6-figure income I made from my last job. So even when I do find new work, I'll become a positive employment statistic but it will still be a net loss for the economy because I'm downwardly-mobile (as is pretty much the whole country).

There is no recovery!

9 posted on 04/02/2010 3:57:27 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
I would loove to see a site dedicated to transposing today's news, written as if Bush Were Still President

Bush Economic Gloom Continues; Census Temp Hiring to Mask Stagnant Job Market
10 posted on 04/02/2010 3:58:59 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
That, economists say, would mark a significant turning point in the recovery.

LOL. Why do people still take anything economists say seriously? The past couple of years of them telling us we're in a "recovery" should have eliminated any sort of credibility these charlatans thought they had.

11 posted on 04/02/2010 4:00:32 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

I will be lucky to find a job making a third of what I made before doing the work of multiple people who were also laid off. If I could get a response to a resume that is.

Where are these burger jobs? I can cook.


12 posted on 04/02/2010 4:01:51 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc; All

Wait a minute! Ain’t it April????


13 posted on 04/02/2010 4:02:15 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Vote Republican! We're 1/10 of 1% better than the other guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

Yeah and just barely. A huge, bloated government that can’t do anything right or anything quickly somehow manages to tabulate March employment numbers (favorably in their minds) in 48hrs. Imagine that!


14 posted on 04/02/2010 4:05:36 AM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The saga of Barack in Wonderland continues.


15 posted on 04/02/2010 4:07:32 AM PDT by auboy (Men who cannot deceive others are very often successful at deceiving themselves. Samuel Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

So in a month we will see a revised report where the jobs numbers dropped “unexpectedly” again? ;-)


16 posted on 04/02/2010 4:10:35 AM PDT by Dem Guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
The past couple of years of them telling us we're in a "recovery" should have eliminated any sort of credibility these charlatans thought they had.

In this case "recovery" is to the present economy as "peace process" is to the Middle East.

17 posted on 04/02/2010 4:11:57 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (A gentleman in the drawing room; a rapist in the boudoir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Just a couple of days ago ADP, who handles a lot of corporate payrolls, reported a loss of 23,000 for March.

ACORN (or whatever they're calling themselves these days) doing legwork for the DNC on TARP money is not a recovery.

18 posted on 04/02/2010 4:22:01 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
"Nice. Jobs that produce nothing being paid for with borrowed money."

And used to sell the public on a fantasy "recovery".

19 posted on 04/02/2010 4:30:08 AM PDT by cake_crumb (RR on ObieCare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs&feature=player_embedded#)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edpc

census jobs, all temporary in nature and even counting these the job creation is well short of the 200,000 or so needed each month simply to stay even with the ever expanding work force.

What happens in September when the million people hired for the census are laid off? How will the libs manage to hide this massive job loss?


20 posted on 04/02/2010 4:42:21 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

And this guy see’s US unemployment rate headed to 10% ad above by late in the year when all these Census workers are laid off.

http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?N=video&T=Westpac’s%20James%20Shugg%20Interview%20on%20Jobs%20Preview%20&clipSRC=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/v2RlleP6PlA4.asf


21 posted on 04/02/2010 4:52:34 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The private ADP Report says

he ADP National Employment Report
March 2010 Report
Nonfarm private employment decreased 23,000 from February to March on a seasonally adjusted basis, according to the ADP National Employment Report®. The estimated change of employment from January 2010 to February 2010 was revised down slightly, from a decline of 20,000 to a decline of 24,000.

The March employment decline was the smallest since employment began falling in February of 2008. Yet, the lack of improvement in employment from February to March is consistent with the pause in the decline of initial unemployment claims that occurred during the winter.


22 posted on 04/02/2010 5:02:24 AM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Oh boy. I guess there's another round of acrimonious exchanges between those who cite the establishment (payroll) survey's numbers v. those who point to the household survey's numbers. Fortunately there's no Republican president to buildup vis-à-vis jobs creation this time.

FR saw many an acrimonious exchange a few years ago.

This time the president is a Democrat so Democrats and the state controlled media (SCM, pron'd: SCAM) will tout the household survey's gigantic numbers v. the establishment (payroll) numbers obtained from the survey of 400,000 businesses who actually have paid workers.

For the household survey of 60,000 households the employed "Includes the unincorporated self employed, unpaid family workers, agriculture and related workers, private household workers, and workers absent without pay."

The payroll survey of 400,000 establishments is derived from Unemployment Insurance tax records that nearly all employers are required to file.

"The payroll [establishment] survey provides a highly reliable gauge of monthly change in nonfarm wage and salary employment. . . . The household survey provides a broader picture of employment [paid for work or not] including agriculture and the self employed."

The household survey's numbers can be in the hundreds of thousands more than the establishment (payroll) survey's numbers. Thus Democrats and the state controlled media (SCM, pron'd: SCAM) will tout the household survey's gigantic numbers and ignore the more accepted payroll numbers.

23 posted on 04/02/2010 5:02:41 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

More cover for Obama by lame stream media.


24 posted on 04/02/2010 5:31:06 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

WALL STREET JOURNAL * APRIL 2, 2010

Long-Term Unemployed Cloud the Jobs Picture

BY GERALD F. SEIB

New jobs numbers will be released Friday morning, and they are expected to show, at last, some significant job creation. A cheer will go up at the White House at this sign that the long climb out of the recession’s unemployment hole may have begun.

But any cheering will be tempered by nagging concern over an insidious problem lurking within the numbers: the startling number of Americans who have fallen into the ranks of not just the unemployed, but the long-term unemployed.

The rolls of long-term unemployed—defined as those unable to find a job for six months or longer—are swelling because of the peculiar causes and character of this deep recession. The consequences are troubling: The long-term unemployed tend to be especially hard to get back into jobs, and they generate their own set of social problems.

President Barack Obama and his team are particularly worried about the phenomenon, and have set out to find ways to combat it. But they’re finding policy prescriptions limited by politics and money.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics tell the grim story. The number of long-term unemployed in February rose to more than six million, fully double the number one year earlier.

Just over 40% of Americans out of work now fall into the category of long-term unemployed. More startling, the problem is markedly worse in this recession than even in the deep slide of 1981 and 1982.

During that painful recession, the overall unemployment rates were just as bad as now, but the problem of the long-term unemployed was far less acute. At the peak of the unemployment scourge in 1981 and 1982, the share of jobless Americans classified as long-term was 26%, compared to the 40% today. (The numbers would actually be worse if they included those who have simply dropped out of the work force in frustration.)

Excerpt.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052702303395904575157730903699168.html


25 posted on 04/02/2010 5:39:38 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
AP/Yahoo drinks the BO koolaid.


26 posted on 04/02/2010 6:07:45 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

When the pResident falls, the AP picks him up with their lies..


27 posted on 04/02/2010 7:59:04 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson