Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aynrandfreak

Rudy would have fared MUCH better against Obama than McLame.


4 posted on 04/02/2010 2:59:51 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Greyhound

Absolutely, RG is a ruthless SOB, and he HATES the anti-American left with a passion.


6 posted on 04/02/2010 3:02:17 PM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
Rudy would have fared MUCH better against Obama than McLame.

Anyone would fared much better against 0bozo than McLame.
Heck, I doubt if McCain even wanted to win at all.
What kind of candidate, goes into an election, and the first thing he does, is to effectively cripple his own campaign by banning any attacks against his opponent on the worst things his opponent has done in his life?
Sarah Palin couldn't understand why McCain banned any attacks on 0bama about Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers etc, and neither could almost anyone else.

8 posted on 04/02/2010 3:06:08 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
Rudy would have fared MUCH better against Obama than McLame.

And he would have been a much better president. At least he loves our country.

13 posted on 04/02/2010 3:12:57 PM PDT by Gosh I love this neighborhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound

He never even came close to McCain in the primary.

I am really disappointed RG won’t run for the Senate from New York.


20 posted on 04/02/2010 3:20:41 PM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
Rudy Giuliani would have had a hard time winning more than a half-dozen states in 2008.

Even many "dark red" rural states would have a hard time supporting a short, bald Italian-American from New York City who speaks with a lisp and had a very liberal track record in the only elected position he ever held.

37 posted on 04/02/2010 4:03:43 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound

I agree.


38 posted on 04/02/2010 4:08:33 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
Rudy would have fared MUCH better against Obama than McLame.

ANTI-PRO-LIFE - Pro-Choice Rudy?

You've got to be kidding!

That above all, killed Rudy right from the start.

45 posted on 04/02/2010 4:27:09 PM PDT by onyx (Facts don't matter. Proof not required. Anything goes! Racial slurs, death threats.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound

Yep. Rudy would have been the better candidate. He’s capable of outwitting and demolishing Obama’s glibness.


51 posted on 04/02/2010 5:24:08 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson