Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy Ship Grabs More Pirates, Lets Them Go
ABC News ^ | 4/2/2010 | ABC News

Posted on 04/04/2010 1:40:46 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

A U.S. Navy ship has sunk a pirate "mother ship" in the Indian Ocean and captured 11 pirates, and then promptly let them go.

It was the second time within 24 hours that U.S. forces captured Somali pirates. Earlier Thursday, five pirates were taken into custody after they attacked a U.S. warship.

While those five pirates remain in custody, the 11 captured Thursday were allowed to leave in small skiffs after the mother ship was sunk. The action prompted a Pentagon spokesman to deny that the Navy had a "catch and release" policy regarding pirates.

A Naval official told ABC News that the practice of releasing pirates is not unheard of. While piracy is illegal according to international maritime law, it is considered a criminal issue, not a national security one.

If the country of the attacked ship does not want to prosecute the pirates, and if Kenya, which has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Naval forces, does not agree to prosecute them, there are few options as to where the suspected pirates can be held and tried.

The latest confrontation occurred when pirates on three skiffs tried to hijack the Sierra Leone-flagged commercial ship MV Evita using rocket propelled grenades and rifle fire.

The MV Evita avoided being boarded by increasing its speed and firing flares, according to a press release by the Combined Maritime Piracy Task Force.

After the ship's captain radioed for help, a Swedish patrol aircraft spotted the pirates and the USS Farragut dispatched its own plane to monitor the situation until the Navy ship could arrive.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catchandrelease; gulfofaden; indianocean; pirates; usnavy; uswarship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2010 1:40:46 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Small skiffs? How far offshore, and what did the weather people have to say?


2 posted on 04/04/2010 1:42:14 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
If the country of the attacked ship does not want to prosecute the pirates, .... there are few options as to where the suspected pirates can be held

Hold them on deck until a crewman is able to toss a rope over the yardarm. Shouldn't take more than a few minutes.

3 posted on 04/04/2010 1:47:30 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Now can we forget about that old rum-runner Joe Kennedy and his progeny of philandering drunks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
“can be held and tried”

How about, shooting them and tossing the bodies overboard?

4 posted on 04/04/2010 1:51:24 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (God bless you Texas! And keep you brave and strong,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

So long as they steamed another 200km away from land before letting them go, then it might be OK. Saves ammo.


5 posted on 04/04/2010 1:53:33 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Something tells me the namesake of that ship wouldn’t have exactly been forgiving of pirates.


6 posted on 04/04/2010 1:53:59 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

Yes.


7 posted on 04/04/2010 1:54:14 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Bag limits.


8 posted on 04/04/2010 2:06:28 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (great thing about being a cynic: you can enjoy being proved wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

ROFL...”You’re too small, I’ve got to put you back. Meanwhile, here’s a picture of the last guys that tried to hijack a US-flagged ship AFTER they got to meet the SEALs. Oh, and would you like a ham sandwich for your trip back? I hear it’s a long row.”


9 posted on 04/04/2010 2:38:55 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

...and we didn’t have 11 body bags why? Amen.


10 posted on 04/04/2010 2:57:47 AM PDT by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

What, did Bambi declare a “catch and release” ROE? Or, has someone decided that they’re too small, so they throw them back?

This is even more ridiculous than me learning to fly fish just because I like the cool colors of the fishing line!


11 posted on 04/04/2010 3:30:57 AM PDT by blu (Graffiti the world, I've seen the writing on the wall...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
>"captured 11 pirates, and then promptly let them go. "

Hopefully to re-board their sunken boat!

12 posted on 04/04/2010 3:52:52 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you," O " you most proud, said the said the Lord GOD of hosts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
... to deny that the Navy had a "catch and release" policy regarding pirates.

I'm a believer in Catch and Release. Catch them, sink their boats and release the pirates- at least 50 miles offshore, no boats, no life jackets.

13 posted on 04/04/2010 3:59:29 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
does not agree to prosecute them, there are few options as to where the suspected pirates can be held and tried.

Why bother. We don't have the will to deal with this and we are the Worlds only Super Power, give me a break. Get me some leadership.

14 posted on 04/04/2010 4:03:13 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 166)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Next time we let pirates go, let's do it from 10,000 feet.

15 posted on 04/04/2010 4:14:11 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
"If the country of the attacked ship does not want to prosecute the pirates, and if Kenya, which has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Naval forces, does not agree to prosecute them, there are few options as to where the suspected pirates can be held and tried."

This is the reason that 'walking the plank' became popuular during previous engagements.

16 posted on 04/04/2010 4:24:57 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Let them go huh? I wonder if it was a simple act of official naval political correctness mandated by Dear Leader for only black pirates? God help them if they were white.


17 posted on 04/04/2010 4:29:35 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
Let 'em go or pay obama lawyers $100k to represent them in their claims of racism and brutalty against the US navy.

The pirates would, in the meantime, be wined, dined and entertained at taxpayer expense somewhere in... Hawaii or something.

18 posted on 04/04/2010 4:56:34 AM PDT by Huebolt (Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Send them to their unhappy hunting ground by blowing them out of the water on sight.

Sheesh.


19 posted on 04/04/2010 5:03:48 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
How about, shooting them and tossing the bodies overboard?

Why waste good bullets?

20 posted on 04/04/2010 5:34:06 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson