hmmm..never saw that article before. That’s a keeper..
That article has supposedly been “Snoped”, and I don’t believe it—it looks fishy because...
.... it refers to the AP as a “birther organization in 2004”.
So I guess I can pose the a similar argument that the anti-birthers pose about the newspaper ad that supposedly proves his US birth, here it goes: “Yeah the AP KNEW he was going to be president, and they KNEW the “birther” crowd would someday NEED something like this to continue controversy”.