Deeb is stil wrong, wrong, wrong. He did not identify the person as actually being in the house. Therefore no lawful reason to enter.
Further, the bondsman nor the deputies can go searching through the house, randomly, looking for whatever.
Other bondsmen carry their paperwork with them to support their case but, still without positvely identifying the bail jumper as currently being in the house, the law is on the woman’s side.
Same goes for the deputies. No probable cause.
Back to Constitution and California Constitution which says basically the same thing.
There is not and would not be a contract giving anyone random authority to search the domain.