Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama nuclear weapons manifesto is detailed
Los Angeles Times ^ | April 5, 2010 | Paul Richter

Posted on 04/05/2010 5:38:44 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian

Reporting from Washington - The Obama administration is releasing a major statement on nuclear weapons policy that will herald a further shrinking of the U.S. arsenal, even as it rejects some sweeping steps advocated by arms control advocates.

The statement, to be released Tuesday, will announce that the arsenal will shrink by thousands of warheads, and it will further restrict when the weapons may be used, U.S. officials say. But the administration has rejected proposals to declare that the "sole purpose" of nuclear arms is deterrence, nor will it promise that the United States won't be the first to use nuclear weapons in a war, say people who have been close to the discussions.

The document, called the Nuclear Posture Review, is an important part of President Obama's program to reduce nuclear arms, which moves into a higher gear in the next few days. Obama will sign a U.S.-Russian arms treaty in Prague, the Czech capital, on Thursday and will host a nuclear security summit in Washington next week.

His review is expected to omit some of the more hawkish statements made in 2001 in President George W. Bush's review.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2selloutamerica; 4thecommongood; amateurhour; appease; bambi; bho44; bhonukes; deerintheheadlights; defense; fifth100days; foreignpolicy; impeach; invitinganattack; kenyancommie; nationalsuicide; nuclear; nuclearsuicide; obama; ovalofficetraitor; proliferation; sissy; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 04/05/2010 5:38:44 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


2 posted on 04/05/2010 5:42:19 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
But the administration has rejected proposals to declare that the "sole purpose" of nuclear arms is deterrence, nor will it promise that the United States won't be the first to use nuclear weapons in a war, say people who have been close to the discussions.

Well, Obama wouldn't want to limit his options in dealing with the Tea Party movement.

3 posted on 04/05/2010 5:43:55 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Remember in November...vote the bums out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

As soon as Obama is outtathere the policy changes so all the funny little foreigners best keep a good grip on their backsides anyway.


4 posted on 04/05/2010 5:44:28 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Drudge:

OBAMA TELLS WORLD: USA WILL NOT USE NUKES IN SELF-DEFENSE


5 posted on 04/05/2010 5:44:36 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

WEAKNESS IS STRENGTH


6 posted on 04/05/2010 5:45:43 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Stupididity is smartishness.

This man is a nimrod, he won’t defend us when we are attacked again. He’ll try to heal and find common ground.

What a dipchit.


7 posted on 04/05/2010 5:51:17 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck (US out of the UN - UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Reversal begins in November.


8 posted on 04/05/2010 5:54:15 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Nachum

Bump and Ping.


9 posted on 04/05/2010 5:54:17 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofie
IMPEACH ... NOW
10 posted on 04/05/2010 5:54:24 PM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: woofie

zer0 will do more for Republicans than they could do for them selves


11 posted on 04/05/2010 5:55:17 PM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Is this the one where he says we won’t use nukes even if hit? It’s like some kind of freakin’ invitation to hit us...


12 posted on 04/05/2010 5:55:23 PM PDT by GOPJ ((http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

With each passing day a new outrage. This man is not an American. It’s as if China, Cuba or North Korea sent someone here to govern the country.

He is the most outwardly anti-American person ever to hold office. At least “Jimmuh” tried to act as if he was the President of the USA, and not some advocate of everything un-American on a mission to punish the American people.

Come on Novemebr 2010 and 2012...get here soon so that America can put an American back in the White House.


13 posted on 04/05/2010 5:56:43 PM PDT by Constitutional Patriot (Socialism is the cancer of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
Well, Obama wouldn't want to limit his options in dealing with the Tea Party movement.

It's scary to think that this bratty, spoiled Child in Chief has the nucular football at his disposal.

In a infantile fit of rage at the opposition from some Americans, he'd have no problem eliminating what he considers to be problematic for his agenda.

And mock them after he did it.

14 posted on 04/05/2010 5:57:41 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

.
Who authored this document?


15 posted on 04/05/2010 5:57:52 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

0bama having ANYTHING to do with developing nuclear weapons strategy is like giving a 4 year old kid a chainsaw and telling him to perform brain surgery on the family dog.


16 posted on 04/05/2010 5:58:00 PM PDT by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I felt much safer when we had 10,000 or so warheads. Cal lme crazy.


17 posted on 04/05/2010 5:58:31 PM PDT by brianr10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

As soon as Obama is outtathere the policy changes
****

that’s true, but first we have to SURVIVE this regime.


18 posted on 04/05/2010 6:01:38 PM PDT by Canedawg (I'm not diggin' this tyranny thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Texas Chuck

He’s not stupid. He’s evil. And he’s out to obliterate western civilization.


19 posted on 04/05/2010 6:02:43 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Anything Obama signs is not a valid treaty until ratified.


20 posted on 04/05/2010 6:07:21 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson