Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Evidence Proves Obama Was Not Honest About Membership In the Chicago Socialist Party
Gateway Pundit ^ | 4/7/10 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/08/2010 9:17:41 AM PDT by Nachum

In 2008 before the election bloggers New Zeal and The Big Feed discovered this photo of Barack Obama and other New Party socialists including Danny K Davis (center), on the front page of New Party News, Spring 1996:

From the photo: Winners! NP-endorsed candidates Patricia Martin (far left), Danny Davis (center), and Barack Obama (far right), celebrate with Chicago New Party members Ted Thomas and Ruth Schools after their victories in the Democratic Primary last month.

Because of this report the Obama camp posted this on their “Fight the Smears” website;

Right-wing hatchet man and conspiracy theorist, Stanley Kurtz is pushing a new crackpot smear against Barack falsely claiming he was a member of something called the New Party.

(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.firstthings.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicago; chicagonewparty; corrpution; ethicsviolation; evidence; fraud; liar; mccain; newparty; obama; proves; socialism; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: old curmudgeon
So that is news?

Just- more sauce for the goose.

41 posted on 04/08/2010 9:55:25 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s a shame, we told people repeatedly he ran on their ticket.


42 posted on 04/08/2010 10:02:29 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

FYI & Update! ;)


43 posted on 04/08/2010 10:05:19 AM PDT by BossLady (<----Butler Alumnus - proud of my Dawgs!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"New Evidence Proves Obama Was Not Honest About Membership In the Chicago Socialist Party"

That would have been enough right there.

Real "news" is NOT obama lying, real "news" is if obama ever tells the truth.
44 posted on 04/08/2010 10:05:35 AM PDT by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited; onyx; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ..

Those who cared to be informed and took the time to seek the important information about this far left radical, knew very well the dark pit of tyranny and socialism in his core.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Barack Obama, Socialist?
October 8, 2008 Posted by John at 8:54 PM

This may be a case of the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. The political, media, cultural and social establishments are determined to elect the pro-status quo, anti-change candidate, Barack Obama, as President.

The power and money arrayed behind Obama seem unbeatable. At the same time, it is inconceivable that the American people would elect a socialist President. So, if this report is correct, something’s got to give.

In June sources released information that during his campaign for the State Senate in Illinois, Barack Obama was endorsed by an organization known as the Chicago “New Party”.

The ‘New Party’ was a political party established by the Democratic Socialists of America (the DSA) to push forth the socialist principles of the DSA by focusing on winnable elections at a local level and spreading the Socialist movement upwards. ...

After allegations surfaced in early summer over the ‘New Party’s’ endorsement of Obama, the Obama campaign along with the remnants of the New Party and Democratic Socialists of America claimed that Obama was never a member of either organization. The DSA and ‘New Party’ then systematically attempted to cover up any ties between Obama and the Socialist Organizations. However, it now appears that Barack Obama was indeed a certified and acknowledged member of the DSA’s New Party.

On Tuesday, I discovered a web page that had been scrubbed from the New Party’s website. The web page which was published in October 1996, was an internet newsletter update on that years congressional races. Although the web page was deleted from the New Party’s website, the non-profit Internet Archive Organization had archived the page.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2008/10/021724.php

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Barack Obama, Socialist? Part II
October 11, 2008 Posted by John at 11:43 AM

We wrote here about Barack Obama’s ties to the New Party during the 1990s.

The New Party was a far-left organization founded by members of the Democratic Socialists of America and other extremists.

It not only endorsed Obama in his 1996 state Senate race, but, when Obama won, wrote that he was an “NP member.” To my knowledge, no mainstream reporter or news outlet has asked Obama whether he was, as the New Party wrote, a member of that organization, or whether he subscribed to the New Party’s far left—it’s fair to say “socialist”—platform.

Some Obama supporters have denied that he was in fact a New Party member, although I don’t think Obama himself has commented. Now a New Zealand web site called New Zeal has dug up a wealth of information on the New Party, including a second claim by the New Party that Obama was a member. This is from the Spring 1996 edition of New Party News:

New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)...”these victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work” said Obama.

This photo was on the front page of that issue of New Party News:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/NewPartyObama88.JPG

The photo’s caption can be construed as creating ambiguity about whether Obama was a Party member or only an endorsed candidate:

Winners! NP-endorsed candidates Patricia Martin (far left), Danny Davis (center), and Barack Obama (far right), celebrate with Chicago New Party members Ted Thomas and Ruth Schools after their victories in the Democratic primary last month.

Taken together, the evidence strongly suggests that Barack Obama was a member of the New Party in the 1990s. At a bare minimum, he was endorsed by the New Party, worked with New Party members and attended New Party events. Given the radicalism of the New Party’s program, it is hard to understand how any interviewer could fail to ask Obama about his association with the group.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2008/10/021747.php


45 posted on 04/08/2010 10:08:45 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

HIs first political job was Chief of Staff

to Alice Palmer, Chicago Pol and member of the Communist Party USA was she not.

While she visited MOSCOW for CP get togethers, Barack ran the office back in Chicago ......

What does this tell you?

Do you know any politicians who go to Moscow for Communist meetings and come back full of praise for the Russian way of life?

Do you know any Socialist New Party members?

Know any AA with two children with Rusian names? (Malia is NOT Hawaiian but it is Russian as is Natasha)

Did you see the Dr. Drew interview about how Barry was a radical gay Marxist while at Occidental??????

So why is anyone surprised at what he is now and what he is doing to us?

I weep for my country ....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBGBszZ2Qw0

http://www.wor710.com/pages/6350883

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/13/marxist-obama-why-the-media-has-been-silent/


46 posted on 04/08/2010 10:19:36 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Where was the FBI background check?

The Justice Department seems to be run by career civil servants (read: liberal Democrats).

47 posted on 04/08/2010 10:26:50 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Dissent is Racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

25,000,000

off to the camps !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Says Bill Runt Shithead Ayers

Barry’s BFF

See for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ&playnext_from=TL&videos=HUfgtcA1QUA


48 posted on 04/08/2010 10:29:54 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler; Nachum; BP2; Red Steel; Fred Nerks; onyx; All

Same link as above

So the New Party claimed Obama as a member as of 1996. Progressive Populist magazine agreed in this editorial:

New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.

The Democratic Socialist Party of America was slightly more modest in claiming Senator Obama as an adherent:


49 posted on 04/08/2010 10:36:07 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; devolve; Nachum; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; All
 

NEW PARTY CANDIDATES


50 posted on 04/08/2010 10:49:19 AM PDT by potlatch (~~"Where secrecy or mystery begins, vice or roguery is not far off. "~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Those who cared to be informed and took the time to seek the important information about this far left radical, knew very well the dark pit of tyranny and socialism in his core.

That's true, but they were just voices crying in the wilderness, and roundly criticized by the "establishment" much like the so-called "birthers", who question his eligibility, are criticized.

51 posted on 04/08/2010 10:59:02 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (The 0bama regime represents an "Clear and Present Danger" to the US - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The real question is - has Obama been honest about ANYTHING?

And the answer is - emphatically NOT.


52 posted on 04/08/2010 11:14:24 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A 4 letter word for someone who is not honest is LIAR.

Frances Fox Piven-A DSA member. regarded as the brains behind ACORN. This wouldn’t be the Piven of the Cloward/Piven strategy, would it?


53 posted on 04/08/2010 11:18:42 AM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: preacher
This wouldn’t be the Piven of the Cloward/Piven strategy, would it?

Indeed, it is.

54 posted on 04/08/2010 11:39:27 AM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
It is clear that ACORN and SEIU played a big role in Progressive Chicago, as did Marxist activists from Democratic Socialists of America and Committees of Correspondence.

Chicago was just one big training camp for the 2008 election.

55 posted on 04/08/2010 12:00:19 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

LOL! “Where’s the proof?” - Hussein Junior

Obama’s whole life has been a series of deliberate calculated lies!


56 posted on 04/08/2010 12:41:35 PM PDT by devolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Yeah, hard to get rid of all these old yellowed newspaper clippings floating round on the net, lol.


57 posted on 04/08/2010 12:57:31 PM PDT by potlatch (~~"Where secrecy or mystery begins, vice or roguery is not far off. "~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: potlatch




America has entered a Black Hole


58 posted on 04/08/2010 1:38:40 PM PDT by devolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Thanks for the laugh.


59 posted on 04/08/2010 1:39:26 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Lol, I thought “I” had when this first opened!
I knew you would be posting something.


60 posted on 04/08/2010 1:40:50 PM PDT by potlatch (~~"Where secrecy or mystery begins, vice or roguery is not far off. "~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson