Posted on 04/08/2010 3:11:07 PM PDT by UltraConservative
Tiki Barber is a certified scumbag. He recently dumped his seven-months-pregnant wife for a 23-year-old hot young blonde.
Clearly, this was love. Or perhaps Tiki was hoping to blame Ronde (rumor has it he loves "The Prestige"). In any case, Tiki apparently found the one young blonde chick with whom Tiger Woods didn't have sex, then had sex with her.
Twin brother Ronde the better half of that set.
who is Tiki Barber?
Yet ANOTHER black "celebrity" with a white, blonde female toy. No racism in this, whatsoever, hmm-mmm......
'nuff said!
“To read more, click here.”
Why?
What you typed doesn’t make any sense.
I guess people like Robert DeNiro are racists, too, right?
Those in denial of the obvious, and those who fear political correctness and sensitivity backlash, will not admit that black athletes, celebrities, etc., over-whelmingly endeavor to land the female white blonde arm-candy as a conquest. VERY FEW of the opposite is true, where a white male seeks the black female in contrast.
Please enlighten me as to why the disparity, and WHY black men seek the white women as in the phrase "where da white women at?".
Well, at least its multi-cultural - black, white, asian - everybody is involved!
TMZ ping
There have been whole books written on this. Many black guys like white woman. Call it the forbidden fruit, or whatever. And, far fewer white guys like black woman. And of course it takes two to tango. SO, we can also say that many white woman are attracted to black men, and fewer black woman are attracted to white men. (Although, I think there is a sizable number of black woman over age 25 or so who have given up on black men and want to date white men.) So, yeah, I agree that a lot of black athletes like white woman. As long as the woman are choosing to go with them, who's business it it but theirs?

For instance: this book can probably helkp answer your question.
His departure from the New York Giants a few years ago was the only thing they needed to make the big step to a Super Bowl championship.
That was a shame, because he was one of the best running backs in the business at the time of his retirement and the best in the history of the NY Giants franchise.
And he has the Super Bowl ring to prove it.
Wouldn’t just the flat out numbers....( More white women, than black women ) make the stats what they are?
sounds like a scumbag, but do you really know what was going on in the marriage..?
Was the upcoming baby his?
Was she threatening to destroy him to get divorce money?
Did he mistreat her, and she decided to wipe him out?
Is he a jerk, and she couldn’t live anymore with him and
got pregnant from another man? Or a sperm transplant?
I’m not trying to defend him, but really I have seen
scumbag husbands, and trash wives before...you really never
know unless you know everything about the two.
Maybe she married him for the $$, and he knew it, and
took advantage...she ain’t too bad looking either by the way (IMHO)..
Most athletes see the white blonde as a trophy, a way to say “I’m so important that I can get a girl who looks like a PLAYBOY centerfold.” Blacks seem to buy into the same mentality but they’re okay with getting nominally attractive white blondes or even pudgy white blondes if they can’t attract anyone who looks more like a centerfold.
I’ve seen it many times - a relatively handsome black male walking down the street with a fat white blonde woman. Apparently, this is the best he felt he could get on the playmate-wannabe scale and she’s just happy to have anyone who doesn’t look as dumpy as she does.
It’s all very shallow which explains why the relationships often don’t last very long.
It's an interesting topic. Not that long ago most conservatives were not ashamed to proclaim that they were opposed to inter-racial dating and marriage. Now that position is considered "racist".
But interestingly many blacks hold that position. In fact the local head of the NAACP here in Vancouver, Washington said so in a newspaper article about a year back.
One cynical definition of a conservative is someone who is 20 years behind liberals. In this case it seems to be a pretty accurate definition. Libertarian/Conservatives would say that one's loyality is to oneself, and if a inter-racial marraige will make you happy you should do it. Traditionalist/Conservatives would say that their are negative repercussions that go beyond the individual, that include the family, culture and race. Part of being a conservative is understanding that you are bound by your societies traditons, and that there are probably good reasons for a lot of restrictions placed on individual behavior.
Mostly FR is sort of neo-con oriented. Part of the liberal stuff that the neo-cons had internalized before moving into the conservative camp was the liberal view of the unimportance of race, the illegitimacy of deciding things based on it, particularly for the white majority.
Many Jews, of course, are quite blatent about disaproving of intermarraige. There are entire charities set up to prevent Jewish intermarraige, and the children of such unions are often shunned. If the mother is not Jewish, they are not considered Jewish.
One thing that whites deciding to have children with blacks must consider is that their children will be considered black by society, will likely consider themselves black, and so consequently may well attach much more importance to the other parent and the black side of the family, and finally the kids will look more like the black parent than the white.
People don't think about those things when they are 19 or 20, which is why society has had some rules for them to follow.
To take our most famous mulatto, Obama, it is amazing that he considers himself black (he checked only the black box on his census form), he wrote a book about his dad (who was never in his life) and seems to reject the white family that raised him. You see this frequently: Halle Berry comes to mind.
Imagine the sadness of that for those parents.
But there are more white guys. Hmm intersting comment. I think what you are saying make sense. Let say to make the math easy there are 200 men & women, & 20 of each are black. Lets say that 1/4 of each group is interested in inter-racial dating. So you have 5 black guys going after 20 white woman. They are likely to have some success. Meanwhile, you have 20 white guys going after 5 black woman. They are less likely to have success.
So perhaps black guys do better at cross-racial dating and stick with it, and white guys get rubuffed and give up?
Interesting.
Amen, amen, amen. Men in a society act in the way women in the society allow them to act. If women keep their legs closed for a long while after meeting a guy, the cheating epidemic goes away. With large numbers of twentysomething women behaving like they're nothing more than penis receptacles, this is what you get. As I said on another thread, thanks to the women's movement, here we are.
Tiki was a cancer in the locker room. His absence due to his retirement was welcomed by the coaches and players.
BTW, didn’t the NYGs win the Super Bowl?
The last time you replied to a comment on one of your threads was October 2008.
Wow.
I have to admit that I complain about men — because I’m 39 and still single and likely always will be as I’m in NYC and won’t play the skank - but I know where the guys bad behavior has its genesis, and it’s in the behavior of many, many women who think the way to a man’s heart is through his....
Read an interesting article in I believe National Review about 20 years ago that dealt with the interracial question. It stated that generaly that males are ranked in masculine qualities with black men 1st and Asian men last. While in feminity that Asian women were first and Black women last. White men and women were ranked in the middle. Because of this Black women had a harder time finding mates, and also Asian Men (in the US) had the same problem. The author stated the solution would be for Asian men to date Black women.
*Please enlighten me as to why the disparity, and WHY black men seek the white women as in the phrase “where da white women at?”.*
Uh, you do know that’s from a film, right? A comedy, right?
What the hell do you care what color women some men want to stick their member into? Plenty of white men like asians, latinas, blacks, whatever else you have...so what?
*It’s an interesting topic. Not that long ago most conservatives were not ashamed to proclaim that they were opposed to inter-racial dating and marriage. Now that position is considered “racist”. *
That’s because that position IS racist. Man, this place is really starting to piss me off. And conservatives wonder why they have a bad reputation in the area of racial issues.
*But interestingly many blacks hold that position. *
Yup, many blacks are just as stupid and racist as a lot of whites—what a shock!
*Traditionalist/Conservatives would say that their are negative repercussions that go beyond the individual, that include the family, culture and race. *
No, conservatives wouldn’t say that. Conservatives would support an individual’s choice to sleep with/marry whomever an individual chooses. What you’re talking about is white nationalism.
*there are probably good reasons for a lot of restrictions placed on individual behavior. *
Maybe, but probably not on love.
*One thing that whites deciding to have children with blacks must consider is that their children will be considered black by society*
And? I guess we’re back to judging people solely by the color of their skin now, huh?
*People don’t think about those things when they are 19 or 20, which is why society has had some rules for them to follow.*
You’re sick in the f*cking head. Has this place been overrun by rednecks lately, or is it just me?
You miss my point: the racism of blacks is ignored, always, and hate crimes, racism, etc. are ALWAYS eagerly slapped onto white male heterosexuals. The double standard is alive and well, and if people want to seek inter-racial partners, that's their business....it's a charachter thing, in my book, but the racism is ignored.
Ah. He’s a professional athlete.
“The United States has become a place where entertainers and professional athletes are mistaken for people of importance. “
Robert A. Heinlein
I don’t know whether to sympathize with Ginny or to congratulate her for the good fortune of losing the louse.
I would appreciate if you would try to maintain the civil tone that is one of the hallmarks of Free Republic. You cam do this by avoiding personal attacks such as “You’re sick in the f*cking head”.
Please note I did not at any point say that I agree with the older position, I was just explaining what I see as the difference between the older conservative position opposed to inter-racial marraige and the more modern one that accepts it.
If I say that “not long ago most conservatives were against inter-racial marragie” that is simply a fact. In 1963 I believe the “Loving vs. Virginia” case was decided. It is the equivilent of saying that “not long ago homosexuality was considered a mental illness”.
So the simple declaration of a well known fact ‘pisses you off’, and your posting goes down hill from there, culminating in a personal insult.
Not much of a way to make a point.
My mother is black and my father is white so I guess they’re the exception to the rule.
Yes, it’s very difficult to swim against the current.
It must be nice to be able to lie so easily. Why don’t you try re-reading what you typed, then get back to me.
How it is “racist” of some blacks to prefer partners of a different color?
Numbers don’t lie in the real world of inter-racial partnerships. Pretty obvious of where this “trophy” mentality resides.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.