Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.A.F Plans Reusable Booster Demonstrators
Aviation Week and Space Technology ^ | 4/10/2010 | By Graham Warwick

Posted on 04/10/2010 10:22:35 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

series of demonstrators is being planned by the U.S. Air Force to mature technology for the Reusable Booster System (RBS), its chosen replacement for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) family beyond 2025.

The first of the demonstrators, the Air Force Research Laboratory’s (AFRL) RBS Pathfinder, is planned to fly in 2013 to evaluate the “rocket-back” maneuver that would enable the unmanned first-stage booster to return to a runway landing at the launch site.

An RBS architecture combining a reusable first stage and expendable upper-stage stack is defined in the new spacelift development plan now in the final stages of coordination within the Air Force, according to Ken Hampsten, chief of spacelift for the Space and Missile Systems Center’s developmental planning directorate, SMC/XR. The plan should be with Air Force Space Command “within the next month or so,” he says.

The spacelift plan calls for development of two versions of the RBS: one with a single reusable first stage and cryogenic upper stage for medium-lift missions; and one with two reusable boosters, cryogenic core stage and upper stage for heavy-lift and growth missions. Initial operational capability is planned for 2025, with the EELV to be phased out in 2030, Hampsten says.

The RBS is expected to reduce launch costs by at least 50% at a nominal flight rate of eight a year, he says. Engines would be used for 10 flights before replacement and the reusable airframe for 100 fights.

Extensive studies identified rocket-back as the most promising return-to-base maneuver for the reusable first stage, says Jeff Slaber, AFRL’s Pathfinder program manager. Unpowered glide-back and turbine-powered jet-back maneuvers have been studied, but rocket-back allows a higher staging velocity — Mach 5-7 compared to Mach 3.5 for glide-back — and reduces the size of the upper stage, he says.

(Excerpt) Read more at aviationweek.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerospace; eelv; rbs; rocketbooster; space; spaceexploration; spacetechnology; usaf

1 posted on 04/10/2010 10:22:35 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

One of the original Space Shuttle designs used a “flyback’ booster, although it was manned, not unmanned.


2 posted on 04/10/2010 11:45:29 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson