Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Change! Iranian Regime Wants Obama Tried By International Tribunal [Hey, works for me...]
Gateway Pundit ^ | 04/12/10 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/12/2010 11:28:59 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Hojjatoleslam Mir Tajeddini wants Obama tried by international tribunal for threatening Iran.

A top Iranian regime offiicial blasted Barack Obama today for his threatening comments about a nuclear attack on Iran. Vice-President for Parliamentary Affairs, Hojjatoleslam Mir Tajeddini, told reporters that Obama should be tried in an international tribunal.

Fars News reported:

A senior Iranian official on Monday blasted US President Barack Obama for his recent threat of a nuclear attack against Iran, urging that Obama should be tried in a tribunal for uttering “criminal” statements against Tehran.

“Obama has uttered dangerous remarks and sanctioned atomic attack and nuclear bombardment of two states of the world, these remarks that authorize atomic attacks against certain countries are criminal (remarks) from the legal point of view,” Vice-President for Parliamentary Affairs Hojjatoleslam Mir Tajeddini said.

He called on international legal experts to try Barack Obama for taking such stances as his remarks are indeed interpreted as an authorization of atomic attacks against Iran and North Korea.

Reminding the rules and regulations of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Mir Tajeddini said, “No country is authorized to use nuclear weapons even under the pretext of deterring a war or its continuation.”

Related… Ahmadinejad asks Obama, “Are you retarded?”


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; islam; karma; liedownwithdogs; obama; poeticjustice; realhopeandchange
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Yeah, send right after Ahmadinejad’s trial for threatening Israel.


41 posted on 04/12/2010 12:37:39 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I don’t believe it ... I actually agree with the mullahs on something


42 posted on 04/12/2010 12:38:07 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Would you hold my hand ... If I saw you in heaven ... to my angel in heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Change you can believe in!


43 posted on 04/12/2010 12:38:54 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Big government more or less guarantees rule by creeps and misfits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Got my vote.


44 posted on 04/12/2010 12:39:40 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
You are taking our obvious pleasure at President Allah being (discomfitingly, for him) hoisted by his own karmic petard, here, entirely too seriously. ;)

I have low goals. I would be satisfied with a landslide GOP presidential victory in 2012. Not only do we rid ourselves of a bad omen, but we also get to listen to the MSM whine for a night or two.

45 posted on 04/12/2010 12:40:03 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


46 posted on 04/12/2010 12:41:19 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MrB

As far as I am concerner, obama is not the President.

He does occupy the offics, but, in my opinion, he was elected through fraud and deceit.

He is a upsurer and a criminal.

Just because the idiots in the United States have been so dumbed down not to notice does not make it right.

He may be your President, but, he damn sure is not mine.


47 posted on 04/12/2010 12:47:24 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sport

Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


No doubt in my mind.


48 posted on 04/12/2010 12:48:34 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: edpc; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
This is funny, coming from a group of people constantly insisting Israel will be destroyed.

Yeah, but I bet Israel wants him tried, too.

Hmmmmm.........might be a good way to get the warring factions to agree on something.

49 posted on 04/12/2010 12:55:31 PM PDT by Liz (If teens can procreate in a Volkswagen, why does a spotted owl need 2000 acres? JD Hayworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I agree, works for me


50 posted on 04/12/2010 1:05:50 PM PDT by The Wizard (I support Madam President, the only President in America today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I don’t think American President’s should be tried by World Courts either but if ever there was one that could fit the bill, it’s Obama. After all, isn’t he the one who wants y’all to be “citizens of the World”??? The guy is a complete disaster and the answer to Ahmadinajad’s question - Are you retarded”? to Obama - YES!! Perhaps insane too. I mean could anybody be any more incompetent and pathetic??? I fail to see how. CO


51 posted on 04/12/2010 1:08:17 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I would say that no American President should face any sort of legal procedings outside the jurisdiction of the United States of America.

I'd make an exception just this once. :)

52 posted on 04/12/2010 2:05:21 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

I hate the bastard as much as anyone,
but it would be a BAAAAAD precedent.


53 posted on 04/12/2010 2:06:37 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Hojjatoleslam Mir Tajeddini wants Obama tried by international tribunal for threatening Iran.

Threatening Iran? I always assumed they were kindred spirits.

54 posted on 04/12/2010 2:12:20 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

For instant case, works for me too. For precedential value, forget it completely.


55 posted on 04/12/2010 2:46:15 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: domenad
I don’t know where my fellow FReepers are, but I wouldn’t turn Benedict Arnold himself over to these creeps....

Concur. We didn't recognize the ICC because it lacks stature to judge American citizens.

We submit only to a burning bush Who Am.

56 posted on 04/13/2010 1:59:34 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers
I say it is well deserved that the International Court try him.

No. Never give countenance to tyrants on the make -- especially would-be supranational, imperialistic ones.

Screw them to death forever.

57 posted on 04/13/2010 2:03:16 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson