Skip to comments.Radio host Boyles: Birther Lakin no punk; O’Reilly a liar
Posted on 04/14/2010 9:44:32 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
PS—— To Hell with BOR
PS—— To Hell with BOR
Great, just what I need, another talk show host that sounds worth listening to, but I’m already having a hard time keeping up with the ones I already do.
You know what, it never ceases to baffle me how some of my fellow forum participants circle-jerk people on our side, then bitch because we don’t get anywhere.
This guy stands to lose the pension he could have in two years, and all you can think about is his selfish motives.
I don’t care for his bloviating style. I’ve never watched him regularly, although I do catch five or so minutes of his comments every few months. During this time, he always confirms what I have thought about him in-between times.
He’s got my respect, so don’t go bloviating about what he is due or not due. He has put his pension on the line to stand up for something he thinks is right.
Of course I’m certain folks used to carp about our Founding Fathers too, another group that actually gave a damn about our Constitution.
What the hell is wrong with you? I want evidence brought in this case, and if need be taken to the Supreme Court. Nobody else has done it.
Boyles is good and has been around forever. He gets a hold of something and doesn't let it go. He is the main reason that the former ICE-agent Cory Voorhis' story in Colorado hasn't died.
Here's some background on that story. I'm not totally familiar with it myself, but I know Boyles' has been on it for a very long time:
I don't always get to listen to Boyles' and he's definitely more liberal than me on some things, but he's good. On some main things like immigration, guns, and Obama's documents he's right on. He's been touching on the documents deal pretty much every day now.
Are you telling me you don’t understand how my response relates to yours?
I just don’t really know what you’re talking about.
What sticks in my gut are the so-called “conservatives” who have ignored Obama’s eligibility from the beginning. SHAME ON ALL OF THEM!
When tyranny comes Rush, Beck, OReilly, Coulter, Medved, Malkin, Levin, Boortz, and the rest will sell their talents to the fascist oligarchy and will lick the boots crushing our necks.
Some things are deal breakers. Obama’s eligibility is one of them. For many of their viewers and listeners these Clear Channel and Fox guys and gals have **permanently** wrecked their brand name for being honest, fair, or balanced.
Also...The so-called conservative yappers are damned stupid. If by some amazing miracle some are patirots ( doubtful), they fail to realize that whether or not they keep silent about Obama now DOES NOT MATTER!!!
** The fascist oligarchy will throw them off the air anyway.
** The fascist oligarchy will take their money anyway.
** The fascist oligarchy will carry out their threats against their families and them anyway
** The fascist oligarchy will reveal their deepest, darkest, most embarrassing secrets anyway.
Pardon me for believing that Obama happens to be eligible for the Presidency, Republicans lost in '08 because they ran a piss-poor candidate on the back of an unpopular administration and if conservatives wish to win future elections, they need to address these issues and not chase the ghosts of "long form" birth certificates.
This birther nonsense is bad for conservatism and it's going to go nowhere. Lakin threw away his career for nothing.
And...There may be hundreds ( or thousands) of military who are endangered by Obama’s rules of engagement who are quietly cheering Larkin’s actions.
That officer who will be taking Larkin’s place may be very **honored** to do so if, in the end, fewer lives of soldiers are lost and the chances of a terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be reduced.
If Larkin prevails many many many American lives may be saved. And....That includes lives here in the U.S. that might be lost because a quisling and usurper is setting domestic terrorist policies that make us all less safe.
By the way....Maybe the military already has predetermined how this will unfold and it possibly may not be in Obama’s favor.
The surgeon taking Larkin’s place may very well feel **HONORED** to do so if Obama is removed from the White House and fewer soldiers will be maimed and killed and Americans will safer at home.
Standing up for the constitution is not bad for conservatism. I like how you say you ‘believe’ Obama happens to be eligible. That’s the extent of Obama’s claim ... belief ... faith ... but no hard facts.
That's just ridiculous. Obama's eligibility will not be a factor whatsoever in Lakin's court martial and anyone who thinks a court martial is going to undo a presidential election needs to quit drinking the birther kool-aid. Don't believe me? Wait and see. It'll happen quickly.
Rush, Hannity, Beck, O’Reilly, Coulter, Malkin, Boortz, Levin, Medved, and the rest.
I hope they **ALL** get to wear the stinking albatross around the neck. They disgust me! All of them.
So?...You aren't able to get inside anyone’s head any better than I can. Anything you might have to say about whether on not another surgeon feels imposed upon is mere speculation on your part.
The Constitution has a requirement that for a man to be President of these United States of America, he has to be a natural born citizen. Any man who was elected or nominated to office, and has taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution is derelict in that duty if they do not demand that Obama produce proof that he is eligible. Inherent in the requirement in the Constitution is a mandate that those responsible, enforce that requirement. None of these men are doing so, including the men on the Courts, even the Supreme Court. Judge R. Barclay Surrick in Philadelphia had the clearest chance to do so, but he didn’t have the courage.
This man who is standing up for what the Constitution says has more guts than all your elected officials, the Supreme Court justices, and the other men who pretend to be statesmen in the shadow of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, etc. Somehow, I know from what the founding fathers did accomplish, they would not stand by and let this man be strung out alone if they were here today. Now it may be that Obama can produce proof that he is natural born and elligible to be President, but in not doing so, he is the one who is 100% responsible for whatever this man and others who would stand up for our form of government suffer. And if he can, and hasn’t, he is one dispicable human being. There is nobody else who has run for this office that hasn’t produced all of their documents.
And the one thing that keeps sticking in my mind is that all the Democrats and the media keep giving him cover. That, more than anything else, will be guiding my votes in the future. Terrence Lakin is, in my mind, a real man. He is willing to face his actions. The one who is responsible for making him go through this is a spoiled little whiny brat who is not. I can find no clearer way to say it than that. He could solve this issue in a heart beat. Those sitting in judgement of this man, rather than prosecuting him, should be getting out of their chairs and standing shoulder to shoulder with him, demanding that Obama and the Democrats conform to the Constitution.
Boy, I can’t wait to vote in November. It is only one vote, but I know I will be on the right side.
Drew68 said: "Obama's eligibility will not be a factor whatsoever in Lakin's court martial and anyone who thinks a court martial is going to undo a presidential election needs to quit drinking the birther kool-aid. "
Why is it so difficult to find someone who both believes Obama is eligible and believes that such eligibility can easily be established in a court-martial as part of the prosecution? Instead, the people who believe that Obama is eligible claim that it is not relevant to whether or not orders from the Commander-in-Chief are lawful?
If it ever happens that an ineligible person attempts to act as President, just exactly what are our military officers supposed to do?
I recall that the Speaker of the House succeeds to the Presidency if both the President and Vice-President are unable to serve. But I am not aware that the post of Speaker of the House carries the same eligibility requirements as the Presidency.
If a Speaker of the House is sworn into the Presidency but does not meet the eligibility requirements of the Constitution, what should the officers of our military do with regard to the orders from such a person?
You can believe whatever you like, but between you and the person you are casting stones at, only one of you has given up something tangible because of his beliefs.
And if you want to go on the record with the idea that the U.S. Constitution isn’t worth defending as it relates to the validity of a man like Obama getting a free ride on this issue, then so be it.
There are valid reasons to be concerned over Obama’s loyalty to the United States. We see that playing out every single day. I think it’s just plain crazy not to want to get a full airing on the facts of his birth.
Something is not right with this guy. IMO, he was not born here. He doesn’t have loyalty to the U.S. He is intent on destroying our ability to lead in this world. He expresses the idea that the U.S. is to blame for the world’s ills, and he is intent on fixing that.
Why anyone would waste their time and energy trying to put someone down who wants to get to the bottom of this, is beyond me.
WinterTime, I agree. I think you’re right on target there.
I'll be curious to see if Obama allows Larkin’s case move toward court martial.
That would be an interesting point, if Obama were to step in.
Wow, would that say volumes...
Who the hell are we to question Bill O?
I mean, come on...
I often watch O'Reilly. I don't always agree with what he says.
My point is this: If O'Reilly has investigated Obama's long form birth certificate as he claims, then surely O'Reilly can tell us the name of Obama's birth doctor and the name of Obama's birth hospital, because the only way O'Reilly can know those facts is if he has personally seen Obama's long form birth certificate in person.
And if O'Reilly, has seen Obama's Hawaii long form birth certificate, then Obama, as I see it, has given up his claim to legal and medical privacy, and Obama should now be forced by the courts to let everyone examine Obama's long form birth certificate.
Myself, I don't believe that O'Reilly has seen Obama's long form birth certificate, and so he has NO idea of the name of the doctor who signed the long form and/or the name of the birth hospital.
So, while I like O'Reilly, I can't but say this: When it comes to his claim that he has "investigated" this Obama birth certificate issue, I say that O'Reilly's investigation is either terribly incomplete, never took place, or it is a fraud claim.
Again, until O'Reilly can tell us the name of Obama's birth hospital doctor and the name of Obama's birth hospital, I say that there is no way O'Reilly can claim that he has thoroughly investigated the Obama Hawaii long form birth certificate issue.
Maybe, and maybe not. If this is going to be settled, it has to get into court. A Court Martial will do fine.
I want to know who the convening authority for any Court Martial would be. It could be the Medical Center Brigade CO, Colonel Gordon R. Roberts or could be the Commander of Walter Reed, Colonel Norvell V. Coots.
Be interesting to see who they might call for the Court.
Colonel Coots and Colonel Roberts, maybe especially Roberts, might have their own problems with the eligibility of the The One. Or maybe not. Col. Coots is a medical officer, unlike Col. Roberts.
I have always had Fox on in the evening, but lately, I am finding myself wanting to flip channels when o’reilly comes on. Is it my imagination, or has he become more of an apologist for the administration.
They won't pull someone just back. They might move someone's deployment time up. How much less "at home" time that might mean is hard to say, since medical and other support types deploy on a different rotation basis than line units. But yes, the person selected will be true patriot, but that doesn't prevent Lt. Col. Lakin from being one as well. Remember we are talking about a guy with one tour already and a Bronze Star to show for it.
Of course what they would actually say is "Not Guilty" as charged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.