Skip to comments.Tehran: If Iran Is Attacked, Nuclear Devices Will Go Off In American Cities
Posted on 04/15/2010 1:58:59 AM PDT by Fennie
This warning, along with an announcement that Iran would join the world's nuclear club within a month, raised the pitch of Iranian anti-US rhetoric to a new high Tuesday, April 13, as 47 world leaders gathered in Washington for President Barack Obama's Nuclear Security Summit.
The statement published by Kayhan said: "If the US strikes Iran with nuclear weapons, there are elements which will respond with nuclear blasts in the centers of America's main cities."
For the first time, DEBKAfile's military sources report, Tehran indicated the possibility of passing nuclear devices to terrorists capable of striking inside the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at debka.com ...
DEBKA. Take it with a huge grain of salt.
Why? Whats so wrong with Debka?
I do remember however, hearing about pre-placed caches of weapons, munitions and communications equipment in Western countries that’d been placed by the Soviets. Has any information come to light of exactly what was in them? I think that the Swiss disarmed one of them after it’d been identified by Mitrokhin.
Yeah, yeah, yeah..we already have a weapon of mass destruction sitting in the oval office. Far scarier than any nuke.
Ahmadinejad. Take it with a huge grain of salt.
I’ll take plenty of salt with that but the phrase is unclear as to whether the suitcases are potential or already in place.
I wonder if Obammy asked the russian delgation attending the summit “ Tell me the whereabouts of the 27 missing 1970’s era suitcase nukes missing from your arsenal”
I do have a certain skepticism when it comes to any such report.
However, I distinctly remember a Debka piece before the campaign in Iraq started; it reported many convoys of large trucks moving from Iraq into Syria. Probably Hussein’s stocks of chem/bio.
Tooooo many people have contributed puzzle pieces to that effect, imho.
So much smoke . . .
Besides, with so much Saudi money
So much deliberate porosity of the borders . . .
it’s almost like the globalists have insured that there are nukes held by terrorists in our cities.
I’d think—given all the givens—that it would be highly unlikely for that NOT to be the case.
If terrorists had nukes in our cities they would have set them off by now.
Why are people acting so effoing surprised. The Iranian rag heads will be doing a lot worse when they get the nuclear bomb. No one will be safe from them until they are erradicated. Yes, the let has manipulated things so that we have waited too long.
Now the lefft must own its folly.
Obama is talking "sanctions" when there should be a dozen glowing deep pit holes just outside Tehran.The conditions for WW III are being created as we speak.
I’ve always found that a silly assumption.
Not all terrorists are psychotic, irrational, impulsive.
Many are disciplined stooges of the globalist oligarchy and do not take a step except as ordered.
If YOU were running the globalist oligarchy and had insured that terrorists had nukes in USA cities, would YOU have allowed the terrorists involved to have been anything other than strictly disciplined and submissive to your orders?
Not to worry,, Jack Bauer will be on the case.
Read the quotes ref’d in my tagline.
They can’t control every detail . . . and things are super complex and evolving.
Nevertheless, the whole show has been meticulously choreographed for at least 110 years.
Dramatic festivities are looming on the near horizon.
Thankfully SOME FREEPERS have awakened to the realities invovled.
SOME seem to still be cluelessly believing the Main Stream Media about life and realities.
Maybe Ithaca NY, Portland, OR, and Detroit as well. /sarc>
But leave Minneapolis / St. Paul alone. We elected Bachmann.
“Dirty bombs are NOTHING compared to actual nukes.”
Whether it be a plane flying into a building or a dirty bomb, terror is what it is. It doesn’t necessarily have to flatten a city
"Now take you weapon of mass destruction and get the F*** out of HERE!"