Skip to comments.Obama extends hospital visitation rights to same-sex partners of gays
Posted on 04/15/2010 7:28:56 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3
President Obama mandated Thursday that hospitals extend visitation rights to the partners of gay men and lesbians and allow same-sex couples to share medical power of attorney, perhaps the most significant step so far in his efforts to expand the rights of gay Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Since when does the President make “law”????? He’s nuts!!
And he issued his edit under what aurhority?
Unless it’s a VA hospital, they can tell him to go to hell.
Who does he think he is, Dictator of the United States?
Doesn’t this require legislation to be passed by both houses of Congress first?
Both things already exist. Visitation rights and/or medical power of attorney is not a “relative” thing.
HIPA laws undone by Executive Order?
The outrages are coming in 3-4 a day now! Where the Hell does it end????
Visitation rights can sometimes depend on the unit type....ICU, for example.
So opt out of Medicare/Medicaid patients. The facility may actually cover operating expenses.
There’s special forms...and I’m sure these “odd people” carry several copies...aand the number of their attorney...
Meaningless pillow talk for the gays. He blows in their ear and they will support him to the end. Wait till they learn how he treats them when he comes out of the muslim closet.
You know what keeps medical costs down? Legalistic regulations and red tape.
Lawyers know nothing of the law of unintended consequences.
He mandated it.
The Great O has spoken!
Let it be writ.
Let it be done.
Who the F*** does he think he is? King Tut? Joe Stalin?
Obama don’t need no stinkin laws.
David Brooks and David Frum will lecture us not to get mad. We need to wlecome gays into the GOP.
Ya gotta dance with the one that brung ya.
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release April 15, 2010
Presidential Memorandum - Hospital Visitation
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
SUBJECT: Respecting the Rights of Hospital Patients to Receive Visitors and to Designate Surrogate Decision Makers for Medical Emergencies
There are few moments in our lives that call for greater compassion and companionship than when a loved one is admitted to the hospital. In these hours of need and moments of pain and anxiety, all of us would hope to have a hand to hold, a shoulder on which to lean — a loved one to be there for us, as we would be there for them.
Yet every day, all across America, patients are denied the kindnesses and caring of a loved one at their sides — whether in a sudden medical emergency or a prolonged hospital stay. Often, a widow or widower with no children is denied the support and comfort of a good friend. Members of religious orders are sometimes unable to choose someone other than an immediate family member to visit them and make medical decisions on their behalf. Also uniquely affected are gay and lesbian Americans who are often barred from the bedsides of the partners with whom they may have spent decades of their lives — unable to be there for the person they love, and unable to act as a legal surrogate if their partner is incapacitated.
For all of these Americans, the failure to have their wishes respected concerning who may visit them or make medical decisions on their behalf has real onsequences. It means that doctors and nurses do not always have the best information about patients’ medications and medical histories and that friends and certain family members are unable to serve as intermediaries to help communicate patients’ needs. It means that a stressful and at times terrifying experience for patients is senselessly compounded by indignity and unfairness. And it means that all too often, people are made to suffer or even to pass away alone, denied the comfort of companionship in their final moments while a loved one is left worrying and pacing down the hall.
Many States have taken steps to try to put an end to these problems. North Carolina recently amended its Patients’ Bill of Rights to give each patient “the right to designate visitors who shall receive the same visitation privileges as the patient’s immediate family members, regardless of whether the visitors are legally related to the patient” — a right that applies in every hospital in the State. Delaware, Nebraska, and Minnesota have adopted similar laws.
My Administration can expand on these important steps to ensure that patients can receive compassionate care and equal treatment during their hospital stays. By this memorandum, I request that you take the following steps:
1. Initiate appropriate rulemaking, pursuant to your authority under 42 U.S.C. 1395x and other relevant provisions of law, to ensure that hospitals that participate in Medicare or Medicaid respect the rights of patients to designate visitors. It should be made clear that designated visitors, including individuals designated by legally valid advance directives (such as durable powers of attorney and health care proxies), should enjoy visitation privileges that are no more restrictive than those that immediate family members enjoy. You should also provide that participating hospitals may not deny visitation privileges on the basis of race, color, national
origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. The rulemaking should take into account the need for hospitals to restrict visitation in medically appropriate circumstances as well as the clinical decisions that medical professionals make about a patient’s care or treatment.
2. Ensure that all hospitals participating in Medicare or Medicaid are in full compliance with regulations, codified at 42 CFR 482.13 and 42 CFR 489.102(a), promulgated to guarantee that all patients’ advance directives, such as durable powers of attorney and health care proxies, are respected, and that patients’ representatives otherwise have the right to make informed decisions regarding patients’ care. Additionally, I request that you issue new guidelines, pursuant to your authority under 42 U.S.C. 1395cc and other relevant provisions of law, and provide technical assistance on how hospitals participating in Medicare or Medicaid can best comply with the regulations and take any additional appropriate measures to fully enforce the regulations.
3. Provide additional recommendations to me, within 180 days of the date of this memorandum, on actions the Department of Health and Human Services can take to address hospital visitation, medical decisionmaking, or other health care issues that affect LGBT patients and their families.
This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
It even includes phsycological counseling and hormones to support the “change”.
Just how we want our money spent in Obama Care...Right..
I thought anyone already had visitation rights with someone who would have them. Oh, well... whatever makes the sodomites happy...
“allow same-sex couples to share medical power of attorney”
You can already give medical power of attorney TO ANYONE YOU CHOOSE.
Maybe it’s just me, but I would’ve thought that such a ruling would have come from a District or Federal Judge; what’s the President of the U.S. doing issuing orders like this? Shouldn’t he be concentrating on Foreign Relations and broad domestic policies? Oh wait, as Emperor, he gets to decide everything, big and small. Well, he shows once again how small he is.
I wonder if I could swish into any hospital and gain access to the private medical records of any man by claiming to be his gay partner? I could start with somebody easy like Barney Frank and maybe move on to other liberal targets.
There are some conservative gays out there. Maybe they could be hired to pose as gay partners to liberals who visit hospitals so their medical records can be accessed.
Exactly right. All that is needed is for the patient to give permission. This is just grandstanding.
No need for as there are few hospitals in the US that would deny visitation to an unmarried partner.
Hitler just took power as does Obummer.
“Meaningless pillow talk for the gays.”
As a nurse, the hospitals where I have worked have a policy that whoever the patient says is family is family. Zero makes it sound as if this is something brand new that he invented. What a jerk.
King Obama: let it be written; let it be done!
The gay tyranny cometh... here we go, now the tax payers have to pay for gays and gay attention in particular. It’s so pimping, I tell ya, you’d think we are in South Chicago or Gary, Indiana.
Placemark for pingout.
I guess the teleprompter forgot to tell Zero that all one needs for a medical powers of attorney is a simple fill-in-the-blank-form and a notary.
anyone can appoint anyone else as their medical power of attorney - doesn’t need a presidential directive, request, memorandum, whatever. It should be up to the individual who is doing the appointing, not the president.
This is dangerous territory.
That's my point. This is just political grandstanding. I hope a Republican has the brains to point that out on national TV.
Yes, but my point was that Zero now feels empowered to issue edits as if he were King.
Ofcourse anyone can be named in a Medical POA.
And we’re paying the tab for HIV, too.
That’s so Larry Sinclair can visit zero should he ever be hospitalized. LOL!
What happens when the patient cannot speak?
This is the man who also issued an EO stopping the enforcement of the protection of conscience rights of doctors, nurses and hospitals - on day one of his administration.
I’m wondering if this allows “partners” to make decisions on behalf of an incapacitated (comatose) hospitalized person without written power of attorney like a wife/husband or parent can. If there are no formalized relationship documents (marriage licenses, birth certificates) what is the hospital to do.
Otherwise, I can give my POA to the neighbor if I so desire - but there my desires are in writing.
I’m just wondering if they are using the term medical power of attorney as a shortcut for the legal standing to make medical decisions.
All of the gay couples I know have taken care of the papework ahead of time and I live in Iowa, where gay marriage is legal. As with all mandates from on high, reverse it. What if the King decides it is not in your best interests for your children to see you on your death bed? That’s what rankles about this. Citizens gay or straight do not need a tyrannical king telling us what is Mandatory and what is not. Its all about control. This is OT, but similar in regard to the fact now we are all organ donors unless we specifically say otherwise. No matter how you feel about donation, I assume if your child is lying comatose, YOU would want to make the decision, not the government as to when to dc life support. That is where we are heading and these, for now, meaningliness controling Mandates and subsequent feel good press coverage, are basically grooming the populace for tyranny. I say Obama can stick his mandates. We are citizens with rights, not subjects to the King. To you gay couples out there, if you are waiting on a mandate from the King to allow you access to your partner, you need a better lawyer
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.