Posted on 04/21/2010 10:20:14 AM PDT by Neville72
Members from all three branches of the Federal government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds.
What they don’t know is how long it will take for most Americans to figure it out, or what to do about it.
The diversionary search for an authentic birth certificate is ongoing and Obama has now spent in excess of $2 million in legal fees to keep that search alive.
Eric Holder’s Department of Justice continues to deploy taxpayer funded attorneys around the country to file dismissals on behalf of Obama, denying all American citizens access to the courts as a peaceful remedy, which only fuels the fire of discontent and the questions about Obama persist.
Michelle Obama states that Kenya is Barack’s “home country.” She knows, after twenty years with Barack. The Ambassador or Kenya has confirmed the same His family friends all know it, and are in fact quite proud of the fact that Americans had no hesitation in electing a “black man from Kenya” as President of the United States.
The US Supreme Court knows what the constitutional condition of “natural born citizen” means. Even the most far left member of that court, Justice Ginsberg, is on record proclaiming that a “natural born citizen” is a birth child of TWO legal US citizens.
Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible for the office of president, which is why she refused to certify the following language when certifying Obama as the DNC candidate for president in 2008.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Even though this has been discussed on here
Please take a look at this link Uncle Chip Provided in another thread.
Clearest explanation of Natural Born and how our framers chose that term I have seen.
This is a good read
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
Going to be quite the summer around here
And now he says we won't rule out shooting down Israeli planes???? There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this monster was not born here and his agenda is pure evil.
Zero will find himslef without a Congress in 2010 and will find himself impeached and probably arrested for fraud after that.
Surely, Nancy “we-have-to-pass-it-to-see-what’s-in-it” pelosi looked into this!!?
And why get all hot and bothered looking into the Constitutional elgibility of a guy the media told us OVER and OVER was a Professor of Constitutional Law and the smartest, book-writin’est, most nuanced diplomat to win the 57 States of one of those super-powers, like it or not??!!
Yep, and no one in DC has had the nerve to address it.
According to Benj Franklin THIS is the definition of Natural Born
“Each of these cases will cite or apply the definition of this term, as given in a book entitled, The Law of Nations, written by Emmerich de Vattel, a Swiss-German philosopher of law. In that book, the following definition of a “natural born citizen” appears, in Book I, Chapter 19, § 212, of the English translation of 1797 (p. 110):
§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. . . .
aND
Vattel did not invent the notion “natural born citizen”; he was merely applying the Law of Nature to questions of citizenship. In fact the term first appears in a letter of the future Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, to George Washington during the Constitutional Convention, where the Framers were consulting 3 copies Vattel’s book to complete their work (according to the testimony of Benjamin Franklin).”
From the link above
Could this be ANY clearer.
Not gonna happen. Don’t bogart. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWWx_5UE2kw&feature=related
From your lips to God's ear,
Only way this entire issue will ever get legs is if, and when, the State-run, liberal, main-stream media decides to make it an issue. Had the State-run media not made Watergate an issue, Dick Nixon would have served his 8-year term.
Had the State-run media pursued the Kennedy murder of Mary Jo, Teddy would have spent years in the slammer. It is all up to the media and we all know where they stand with Hussein Obama.
Why, I wonder. What's in it for them, the media? When you think about it, it really DOES NOT make sense. Why are they going thru all this trouble to protect obama???
But how do we send the bastardo to his real homeland.
Whats always in it for them? Influence over the opinion of the entire nation. Power.
When?
And to prevent a president from being elected who has the goal of the destruction of the United States.
The left circumvented this safeguard.
When the Democratic party nearly becomes extinct in the 2010 elections, perhaps members of their own party will unleash the truth to rid themselves of Obama rather than face a challenge from other candidates in the 2012 presidential primaries that would permanently fracture their party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.