Skip to comments.
U.S. Says Florida Can't Opt Out of Federal Healthcare
HEALTH NEWS FLORIDA ^
| 4/23/2010
| Carol Gentry and Jim Saunders
Posted on 04/23/2010 11:58:03 AM PDT by tutstar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: SharpRightTurn
Democrats' version of the Constitution: Blah,blah,blah...promote the general welfare..blah,blah, blah....regulate..blah,blah,...commerce....blah,blah,blah.
See?Right there is their authority in the Constitution!All those other words setting limits are just so much un-needed and out-dated.
41
posted on
04/23/2010 12:15:02 PM PDT
by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
To: tutstar
The arrogance of the federals knows no bounds. Once again, though it were any other way, the States are being pushed hard, individually and in groups, towards a constitutional convention.
The federal government of the United States is out of control.
Even assuming the Republicans win a tremendous victory in the next elections, things may have reached a point where because they are unable to act, all that may be required of them is to keep the federal government out of the way, as the States take control back.
There should be no fear of radicalism here, because the only thing that 38 States will agree to is that federal power must be diminished with respect to State power. And while this could mean many changes to the constitution, likely they will choose just the path of minimum change, with maximum agreement.
To: IMissPresidentReagan
War for Independence III
(1861 was Rev 2)
43
posted on
04/23/2010 12:16:04 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
just let the states go that wanted to not be a part of this whole load of collectivist crap,
but its gonna get messy, because they wont.
Because Obama won and we lost and that’s how it is to them. Screw them.
44
posted on
04/23/2010 12:16:18 PM PDT
by
Bitsy
To: IMissPresidentReagan
Mr Haynesworth an Mr. Pickins, man your cannons.
45
posted on
04/23/2010 12:16:24 PM PDT
by
dblshot
(Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
To: tutstar
They’re going over the state heads to the freeloaders themselves. Its a perversion of the Ronald Reagan method of going directly to the voters.
46
posted on
04/23/2010 12:17:51 PM PDT
by
RoadTest
(Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
To: tutstar
“..they cannot deny their citizens access to its benefits or requirements”
Citizens have the “right” to “access requirements”?
Citizen, pay up. It is your right!
47
posted on
04/23/2010 12:18:06 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
To: timestax
48
posted on
04/23/2010 12:19:35 PM PDT
by
I still care
(I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
To: tutstar
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen SebeliusIsaiah 3
12 As for My people, children are their oppressors,
And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err,
And destroy the way of your paths.
Hmm. Doesn't seem to speak too kindly of having women rulers.
49
posted on
04/23/2010 12:20:20 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: tutstar
50
posted on
04/23/2010 12:20:33 PM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
To: tutstar
.
So, the Americans in Florida do not want San Francisco extremists running their lives?
51
posted on
04/23/2010 12:21:03 PM PDT
by
Touch Not the Cat
(Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
To: tutstar
Where in the Constitution does it say that an HHS Secretary has the power to trump state law when the state is asserting its 10th Amendment rights?
52
posted on
04/23/2010 12:22:01 PM PDT
by
84rules
( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
To: tutstar
If a state were free to nullify federal laws within its borders, or, by logical extension, to secede from the union altogether, that would pretty much spell the end of federalism in favor of a loose, and not very durable, confederation of states. Is that really what we want? A lot of blood was shed 1861-65 to determine whether this would be the choice. The outcome seems to have been that federal problems need to be resolved at the federal level.
53
posted on
04/23/2010 12:23:01 PM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: tutstar
Without mentioning any particular state or going into detail, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that state and local officials can vent all they want about a so-called federal takeover of health care. But they cannot deny their citizens access to its benefits or requirements, she told the Association of Health Care Journalists. Florida proposed law would not deny, mere allow one to opt out without penalty.
54
posted on
04/23/2010 12:23:34 PM PDT
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: screaminsunshine
55
posted on
04/23/2010 12:24:17 PM PDT
by
mrmeyer
("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
To: tutstar
Huh? How is that possible? What a bunch of insane dictators these people are.
I live in Florida, and believe me the battle is on!
56
posted on
04/23/2010 12:24:47 PM PDT
by
livius
To: tutstar
“The fact that we have to have this debate in the United States of America is troubling and bizarre,’’ said Rep. Mike Horner, R-Kissimmee.”
This should be repeated over, and over, and over, and over, and over........until every single American has heard it. Then, just maybe, those with their heads in their nether regions, will GET A CLUE!
To: tutstar
Wow.
Get the lawyers ready for another round of litigation that will go all the way to the SC.
58
posted on
04/23/2010 12:26:12 PM PDT
by
CriticalJ
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
To: 84rules
It doesn’t. The health bill, however, empowers “The Secretary” to do all kinds of stuff...none of which seem to be Constitutional.
Course, that doesn’t stop libertards from doing what they do: march towards Marxism.
59
posted on
04/23/2010 12:27:29 PM PDT
by
mattdono
(A REAL soldier of the People encourages men to be self-reliant & independent, not rely on government)
To: tutstar
If 0’b ain’t legal,,there ain’t nuthin to opt out of , Goober.
60
posted on
04/23/2010 12:27:44 PM PDT
by
Waco
(Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenues)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson