Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Artificial Birth Control weakens marriage and the family, it contributes to the increase in divorce, and it has inevitably lead to abortion.

Artificial contraception was condemned as a sinful act by every major Christian denomination in the world, Protestant and Catholic, until 1930. Pope Paul VI in his 1968 Encyclical Letter, Humanae Vitae reaffirmed the Catholic Church’s continued position against Artificial Birth Control because it is in direct opposition to the fundamental purposes of marriage and family. The very word contraception means against conception—against new life.

Pope Paul VI warned that the widespread use of contraception would lead to “conjugal infidelity and the general lowering of morality.” The rates of abortion (about one of every four pregnancies in the US), divorce (approximately 50 percent of all marriages), family breakdown, wife and child abuse, venereal disease, and out of wedlock births have all massively increased since the mid-1960s.

When birth control fails many people will inevitably turn to abortion. The contraceptive mentality of the culture has become increasingly dependent upon the “back-up” of abortion to the extent that the value of human life is becoming increasingly cheap. In vitro fertilization, cloning, genetic manipulation and embryo experimentation—which turn human life into a mere commodity—are all descendants of contraceptive technology.

--------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------

From: Birth Control and NFP: What's the Difference? (by Fr. Frank Pavone) http://www.priestsforlife.org/articles/nfpdifferences.html (excerpts)

[Natural Family Planning] NFP does not refer to the so-called “calendar rhythm method”, which was based on calendar calculations of a “normal” cycle. NFP, instead, is based on direct observations of various signs that occur in a woman's body which tell her when ovulation occurs. These observations are relatively easy to make, take only a few minutes, and work even for irregular cycles. NFP is internationally known and practical and has an extremely high effectiveness.

NFP does not separate sex from responsibility.

NFP is not just a “method” based on physiology. Rather, NFP is based on virtue. It is based on sexual self-control, which is necessary for a healthy marriage.

NFP puts the responsibility for family planning squarely on the shoulders of both partners, because it requires communication and cooperation.

NFP is not just a means of avoiding pregnancy, as artificial contraception is. Rather, it can also be used to achieve pregnancy since it pinpoints ovulation. It is a wholly positive approach to the sexual life of the spouses. It is clean, inexpensive, morally acceptable, and reliable.

As with anything good, NFP can be misused, if a couple has the wrong motives. Married couples are called by God to cooperate generously in bringing forth and educating new life. For a couple to decide that “we don't want children at this time”, there need to be serious, objective reasons (health, finances, etc.). If the reasons are not objective but selfish, then the couple cannot justify the avoidance of pregnancy just because they are using NFP to do it. In this case they are not practicing “family planning”, but “family avoidance”!

The Pill can cause abortion: Contraceptive drugs (including “the pill”) act in three major ways: 1st, they prevent the release of the egg from the ovaries; 2nd, they thicken the mucus in the reproductive tract, making it more difficult for the sperm to reach the egg; and 3rd, should the egg manage to be released and fertilized, thus forming a new human being, they cause the wall of the uterus to prevent implantation, thus causing the new child to be aborted.

Dr. Ronald Chez, a scientist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), publicly stated that the new Pills of today, with their lower estrogen dose, allow ovulation up to 50% of the time! It is estimated that Chemical “Contraceptives” cause between 7 to 12 million early abortions each year in America (Source: Study of Abortion Deaths Ad Hoc Commission 1995). Most women using the Pill (and other “birth control” methods) do not know they can become pregnant and have early abortions.

To find out more about the Pill and other chemical contraceptives that cause early abortions, go to:
“Birth Control Abortions”. http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html

Church teaching on birth control
Catechism of the Catholic Church 2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, “every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible” is intrinsically evil:

Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality. http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt3sect2chpt2art6.htm#2370

2399 The regulation of births represents one of the aspects of responsible fatherhood and motherhood. Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception). http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt3sect2chpt2art6.htm#2399

Internet Resources:

Humanae Vitae: On the Regulation of Births, Pope Paul VI, 1968 http://www.usccb.org/prolife/tdocs/humanaevitae.htm

Natural Family Planning (NFP) http://www.ccli.org/

Pope Preaches Inviolability of Human Life and Sanctity of the Family to Europe, Africa
http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/81-01-15popeabortion.html

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

45 posted on 04/23/2010 7:02:10 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available FREE at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpforlife.org
The traditional Lutheran stance (and for that matter the traditional Christian stance) on contraception is that it is ultimately bad for the marriage bed and for the souls of those involved. Few pastors, or priests, preach that anymore. Though in some place it is still common.
50 posted on 04/23/2010 7:34:51 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson