Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hayworth pleased Brewer signed immigration bill
KTAR ^ | April 23rd, 2010 | KTAR

Posted on 04/23/2010 4:38:36 PM PDT by mdittmar

PHOENIX - Former Congressman J.D. Hayworth welcomes the governor's signature on the new illegal immigration law.

He released this statement to the media: "The Governor did the right thing by signing Senate Bill 1070 into law. It mirrors the 'Enforcement First Act' I authored five years ago in the United States House of Representatives. As John McCain and others serving in Washington have alternated between inaction and amnesty, Arizona acted decisively today to enforce the rule of law and truly secure our border."

Hayworth is challenging Senator John McCain for McCain's U.S. Senate seat in the Republican primary.

He has criticized McCain for his previous attempts to pass comprehensive immigration reform by working with the late Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az2010; brewer; illegals; jd; jdhayworth; jdistheanswer; mccain; mccainistheproblem; noamnesty4mccain; sayno2amnesty; votejdhayworthaz
Still looking for McCains' statement.
1 posted on 04/23/2010 4:38:36 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Crickets


2 posted on 04/23/2010 4:41:26 PM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Right now he’s trying to work up a smiley face. ROTFL!!!


3 posted on 04/23/2010 4:44:14 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 999replies
This is a perfect setup to bid Juan adios! Buenas Noches, Juan!
4 posted on 04/23/2010 4:47:23 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Still looking for McCains' statement.

Don't forget his amnesty sidekick Palin.
5 posted on 04/23/2010 4:50:24 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

So?


6 posted on 04/23/2010 4:56:54 PM PDT by sauropod (Ill behaved women rarely make dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

McCain probably cursing out conservatives somewhere...like in Arizona


7 posted on 04/23/2010 5:00:40 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

So,What?


8 posted on 04/23/2010 5:06:45 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free (http://teapartypatriots.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Guarantee you Palin will come out against amnesty when it hits the fan. She has already said so on Rush and Lars Larson show but you disingenuously ignore that.

Any statement Palin made in 2008 is completely void. They did not win the election, so you can't judge her on something that didn't happen under her and McCain's watch. Palin is her own person now, and going forward I'm confident that she will speak out decisively against amnesty.

9 posted on 04/23/2010 5:10:40 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Man50D; DoughtyOne; AuntB; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; ...
Any statement Palin made in 2008 is completely void.

There's still that statement she made in March 2010, on live television, while standing with MeCain.

There's also a number of very disturbing statements she made in 2010 in an Arizona Republic editorial in which she basically endorsed McCain's 10+ year record of stabbing the conservative movement in the back.

Oh, and one more thing: if you want to take the 2008 statements off the table for Palin, you must also take Romney's little screw up praising Romneycare off the table.

10 posted on 04/23/2010 5:28:51 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Extremely Extreme Extremist

And if you want to take Palin’s incoherent or troubling 2008 answers off the table, then I presume we will be taking her 2008 convention speech off the table too?


11 posted on 04/23/2010 5:38:16 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

McCain — “well friends my crazy wife’s beer business might be harmed if fewer illegals are running around drinking Corona and Tecate.”

I think she actually sold the beer business. Megan was drinking too much of the product plus eating donuts.

The MCCains sicken me.


12 posted on 04/23/2010 5:40:45 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain & Graham = La Raza's favorite Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Guarantee you Palin will come out against amnesty when it hits the fan. She has already said so on Rush and Lars Larson show but you disingenuously ignore that.

You Sarahbots conveniently ignore the fact she has flip flopped on the amnesty issue in interviews in order to play both ends against the middle like her pro amnesty compadre.

Any statement Palin made in 2008 is completely void.

By who's rules? That would be a first. Any statement made by a politician is on the record indefinitely.

They did not win the election, so you can't judge her on something that didn't happen under her and McCain's watch.

Sure I can. Losing doesn't negate or change her beliefs on particular issues. Trying to make up rules as you go along only reveals the depth of your desperation to defend her.

Palin is her own person now, and going forward I'm confident that she will speak out decisively against amnesty.

Then why is she still endorsing McAmnesty? Why didn't she speak out decisively long ago instead of giving conflicting interview? She'll have to dump McAmnesty in order to oppose amnesty.
13 posted on 04/23/2010 5:41:04 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Isn't Romney tougher on illegal immigration than Palin? Tancredo backed Romney.
14 posted on 04/23/2010 5:42:26 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain & Graham = La Raza's favorite Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant
And if you want to take Palin’s incoherent or troubling 2008 answers off the table, then I presume we will be taking her 2008 convention speech off the table too?

Only as it pertains to illegal immigration. That was a position she had to take as the running mate.

15 posted on 04/23/2010 5:56:04 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

How about this one supporting TARP and McCain’s push for it. And she trashes other republicans who didn’t go for it.

BTW, the firms...like Goldman who got bailed out are his biggest contributors. No wonder he suspended his campaign so fast to sit down with Obama and Paulson.

[snip] Here is what Palin says in “Going Rogue” about the bailouts, on page 270.

[T]he House of Representatives rejected a Bush-backed economic bailout plan in a vote in which two-thirds of Republicans voted no. The impression this made on the electorate was not helpful to our cause. Millions of Americans were poised to go bankrupt or lose their savings, and the perception was that Republicans had failed to respond.

http://washingtonindependent.com/68578/yes-palin-backed-the-bailouts


16 posted on 04/23/2010 5:58:10 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I see. So the Palin fans get to choose which 2008 policies were the real Sarah and which were the policies she just decided to sit down and shut up on McCain’s behalf. That sounds a bit rigged to me. LOL


17 posted on 04/23/2010 6:04:31 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
You Sarahbots conveniently ignore the fact she has flip flopped on the amnesty issue in interviews in order to play both ends against the middle like her pro amnesty compadre.

You 3rd-party hacks completely don't comprehend the difference between being a part of someone's campaign and now being your own person. That interview she gave in 2008 is completely irrelevant to any potential presidential campaign or leadership role she assumes now.

By who's rules? That would be a first. Any statement made by a politician is on the record indefinitely.

Sarah was a part of someone else's campaign. Romney, for example, ran as his own person in 1994 and in 2008. There's no flip-flopping there. She has made pro-border security statements recently which means she has formulated her own opinion on the subject.

Sure I can. Losing doesn't negate or change her beliefs on particular issues. Trying to make up rules as you go along only reveals the depth of your desperation to defend her.

If she ran for President in her own right in 2008, then yes by all means call her a flip-flopper. But if she was a part of someone's campaign, a running mate, then the point is moot. Bush I was pro-abortion prior to becoming Reagan's running mate. Did he promote pro-abortion views in defiance of his boss?

Then why is she still endorsing McAmnesty? Why didn't she speak out decisively long ago instead of giving conflicting interview? She'll have to dump McAmnesty in order to oppose amnesty.

You've been told a million times why she endorsed and supported McCain, and even JimRob agrees with what Sarah did. You simply don't spite the person that brought you out in the national spotlight. You pay your respects and then forge your own path, which is what Sarah is doing.

18 posted on 04/23/2010 6:04:49 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Let’s see, who were some of the other Republicans who didn’t buy the Paulson/Bush/Pelosi BS? Hmmmm. Hunter comes to mind. As does Pence and Sessions and DeMint.


19 posted on 04/23/2010 6:06:25 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
How about this one supporting TARP and McCain’s push for it.

Because McCain supported it.
What part of "running mate" do you folks not understand?

20 posted on 04/23/2010 6:06:26 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant
So the Palin fans get to choose which 2008 policies were the real Sarah and which were the policies she just decided to sit down and shut up on McCain’s behalf.

Get real pissant.
McCain would have advanced Sarah's belief in energy independence, among her other beliefs.
Things like immigration and the bailouts were simply out of her control.
I bet though, had McCain forced amnesty, Sarah would have protested after watching millions of Americans oppose it. You know how she is.

21 posted on 04/23/2010 6:09:07 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
rabscuttle -

How's your e-mail hacking trial going?

22 posted on 04/23/2010 6:19:28 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
“Isn't Romney tougher on illegal immigration than Palin? Tancredo backed Romney.”

Mitten's stand on immigration will change daily depending on what he thinks will bring the most votes. Palin hasn't had illegals landscaping her lawn; Romney has.

23 posted on 04/23/2010 6:22:04 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Does anyone know the latest poll numbers in this race?


24 posted on 04/23/2010 6:26:36 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
How's your e-mail hacking trial going?

What e-mail hacking trial?

25 posted on 04/23/2010 6:28:14 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“Don’t forget his amnesty sidekick Palin”

Palm to forehead

Aw..... not this sh*t again....

You seriously need to read more.... or go to a Palin speech.


26 posted on 04/23/2010 6:28:34 PM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner; Man50D
You seriously need to read more.... or go to a Palin speech.

You mean like the one where she said she supported McCain's position on immigration, i.e., amnesty?

27 posted on 04/23/2010 6:29:47 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

I actually posted that and at the bottom I put

runs away

but it did not show up in my post.

FR does not allow pointer brackets. I should have tried (runs away).


28 posted on 04/23/2010 6:37:34 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain & Graham = La Raza's favorite Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Just so I’m clear: Her global warming, amnesty, TARP, special needs welfare, predatory lenders, and equal pay for women are all just supporting McCain


29 posted on 04/23/2010 6:40:27 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Go J.D.


30 posted on 04/23/2010 6:49:24 PM PDT by rockinqsranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You 3rd-party hacks completely don't comprehend the difference between being a part of someone's campaign and now being your own person.

Oh I see. She was willing to not be her own person and thereby sacrifice her principles during the 2008 campaign in order to become VP. That couldn't be more disingenuous.

Sarah was a part of someone else's campaign.
Palin was willing to be part of someone else's campaign. No one held a gun to her head to be McAmnesty's running mate.

There's no flip-flopping there.

There was flip flopping between her 2008 Univsion interview supporting amnesty and subsequent interviews.

If she ran for President in her own right in 2008, then yes by all means call her a flip-flopper.But if she was a part of someone's campaign, a running mate, then the point is moot.

On the contrary. It shows she willingly accepted to be the running mate of a candidate who has a track record of voting with socialists many times over the years.

You've been told a million times why she endorsed and supported McCain, and even JimRob agrees with what Sarah did. You simply don't spite the person that brought you out in the national spotlight. You pay your respects and then forge your own path, which is what Sarah is doing.

Which only exemplifies the same number of times her choice of party over principle. Paying respect by supporting a flaming socialist over a conservative candidate is not the way to advance the conservative cause. That ignores the fact she owed nothing to McAmnesty since his first choice was fellow flaming socialist Joe LIEberman.
31 posted on 04/23/2010 7:17:06 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner
You seriously need to read more.... or go to a Palin speech.

How about this speech?

Palin On Amnesty

Governor, let me ask you about immigration. How many undocumented immigrants are there in Alaska?

I don't know, I don't know. That's a good question.

As governor, how do you deal with them? Do you think they all should be deported?

There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant -there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants- not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration.

Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?

No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.

To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?

I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.


32 posted on 04/23/2010 7:25:41 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Oh I see. She was willing to not be her own person and thereby sacrifice her principles during the 2008 campaign in order to become VP. That couldn't be more disingenuous.

It would have been tacky for her to do so, which is why she obediently complied. What running mate do you know of went against the boss?

Palin was willing to be part of someone else's campaign. No one held a gun to her head to be McAmnesty's running mate.

Exactly, that's my point. She was his running mate so therefore she had to endorse his positions. That's how the game is played.

There was flip flopping between her 2008 Univsion interview supporting amnesty and subsequent interviews.

And that Univision interview has no bearing on her views today. She is her own person and is not part of anyone else's campaign or team. Again, she clarified her views on Rush and on Larson's shows.

On the contrary. It shows she willingly accepted to be the running mate of a candidate who has a track record of voting with socialists many times over the years.

Hello, McCain was the Republican nominee. When you get offered the VP slot, you just don't turn it down. But you're a 3rd party hack who doesn't believe in fighting within the existing political structure.

Which only exemplifies the same number of times her choice of party over principle.

What other RINO has Palin endorsed?
This was just a general, kiss on the cheek endorsement of McCain. If you check her summer schedule, she is going to be busy with the documentary series and doing the fishing run with Todd. She's not going to be near McCain towards the primary. She gave her thanks and that's that.

33 posted on 04/23/2010 8:34:23 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
You mean like the one where she said she supported McCain's position on immigration, i.e., amnesty?

You mean when McCain actually talked about border security and Sarah basically agreed with him? When amnesty wasn't even part of the speech?

34 posted on 04/23/2010 8:38:28 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
It would have been tacky for her to do so, which is why she obediently complied

It would have been tacky to support conservatism so she obediently acquiesced to a socialist point of view? No wonder why the OP(formerly the GOP) lost control of the White House and Congress to socialists.

Exactly, that's my point. She was his running mate so therefore she had to endorse his positions. That's how the game is played

You conveniently glossed over my obvious point she chose to be his running mate and in doing so was willingly agreed with those positions that he in turn has voted with socialists on many issues. She could have turned down his offer on the premise his socialist views did not coincide with her principles. Her acceptance confirmed she agreed with him.

And that Univision interview has no bearing on her views today.

Any statements by a politician always bare relevance. In her case at proves at best she changed her view to appear as though she always opposed amnesty in the hopes people would forget her 2008 interview. She used the same disingenuous tactic as McAmnesty has used for many years.

Hello, McCain was the Republican nominee. When you get offered the VP slot, you just don't turn it down.
You do if the candidates positions on issues are fundamentally different from yours.

This was just a general, kiss on the cheek endorsement of McCain.

This was just a general, kiss on the cheek endorsement of McCain.

Either a person supports a candidate or doesn't support a candidate. Palin can't have it both ways. That's tantamount to saying someone can be only a little bit pregnant. She still supports him.
35 posted on 04/24/2010 4:24:35 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

You make a good point, but on this ... “like Goldman who got bailed out are his biggest contributors” ... just want to interject the factoid that OBAMA got more Goldman Sachs contributions than any other candidate. More than all the Republicans combined.


36 posted on 04/24/2010 6:13:31 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Hello, McCain was the Republican nominee. When you get offered the VP slot, you just don’t turn it down. “

You are right.

But if Palin disagreed with McCain on issues, she had the opportunity since 2008 until this year not to endorse him and/or stay out of his Senate race and/or specifically distance herself from McCain’s record. If you have any palin quote “McCain was wrong to support amnesty, bailouts and McCain-Feingold” quotes, I’m all ears.

Frankly, her McCain support smacks to me of what Pres Bush did in endorsing Arlen Specter over Toomey in 2004.
establishment vs conservative.

And I speak as someone generally supportive of her. We can’t sweep her straddling of this issue under the rug. It’s real - she’s not solid on immigration.


37 posted on 04/24/2010 6:19:33 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Yes, I realize that...McCain is slightly less corrupt than Obama.


38 posted on 04/24/2010 7:32:41 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Because McCain supported it.
What part of “running mate” do you folks not understand? “

Look, a couple weeks ago she stated she’s all about McCain and supports his positions. Her words, you’ve seen them.

Is she STILL his running mate?


39 posted on 04/24/2010 7:40:53 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

That is not a speech, it is the Univision Interview that the McCain Campaign sent her on in early Oct 2008. One that people with PDS, like you, love to throw around....

Univision is an Hispanic Station, and McCain’s people, former Romney Campaign workers, (ill) prepared Palin to support McCains position on ilegal immigration in front of that narrowly focused audience...... You’ll notice that Sarah, after some disjointed replies at the beginning, realizes the trap she has been led into, “Goes Rogue,” and recovers nicely to HER viewpoint....course you choose to ignore that.....didn’t ya?

(Palin) “.....It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.”

Sounds just like she said she supports “Legal immigration” doesn’t it? “People that follow the Rules! People that follow the Rules? People that follow the Rules are not illegal immigrants.....get it???????

Gee, a VP Candidate that supports the current US immigration laws? Wow! Supports the Current Law! Horrors! What a revelation! Startling isn’t it! Off with her head!/s

And you know that’s what she said, and meant, because you posted it.....( I assume you actually read it, and have some degree of reading comprehension...a fact not entirely in evidence....LOLOLOL)

So where’s the Palin SPEECH that says she supports a policy of Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants? You know something more than some out of context quip? Sarah is not bashful about writting out policy statements on her Face Book page...should be easy for you to find one on Amnesty that supports your contension, right? I’m waiting.....Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

Say, who is it you support? Ron Paul? Mitt Romney? Some 3rd party crackpot on the local steet corner? (Obama?.... Nah) Why don’t you post your opinion about how great they are....you know float their boat higher, instead of infecting Palin threads?

AHHH, I get it! It’s more fun for you to shoot at Palin and try and sink her boat......fat chance there, given your tactic of misquotes, misrepresentation of facts, out right deception.......on and on etc,... that all, except the most unaware/biased, see right through it.........LOLOLOLOLOLOL

LOLOLOLOL You’re funny! LOLOLOLOLOL

Say wait a minute.... you don’t think I’m dumb enough to believe your stuff, do ya? How insulting! LOLOLOLOL


40 posted on 04/24/2010 9:22:04 AM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar; All

MUST SEE!!! 4 minutes

FLUSH THE JOHN..JOhnny’s got to go!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJobkdeho88


41 posted on 04/24/2010 11:03:38 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson