Posted on 04/28/2010 12:27:38 PM PDT by Hanen2010
Both of these videos are from Monday evening, April 26th. The Financial Times article is from this Sunday. They are elements of the most extensive scandal perhaps, since original sin.
While the Beck video is even much more significant than this, the point is that Barack Obama nixed real reform in the Obamafinance bill. The transparency would have gotten in the way of the astounding plan of which he is a focal point. This entire interview is important, but be sure to listen, after the two minute mark, as Greta Van Susteren interviews Senator Jim DeMint.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
The greatest scandal in the history of this country is that an undocumented Kenyan who was educated in Indonesia, and by radical leftists, has lied his way into the oval office and is swindling America out of its Exceptionalism.
PING to read later.
bttt
bump
Have you seen this one?
New investigation into Obama background spells trouble ahead
April 28, 12:24 PMConservative ExaminerAnthony G. MartinPrevious
Get alerts when there is a new article from the Conservative Examiner. Read Examiner.com’s terms of use. Email Address
ShareThis
A brand new, in-depth investigation into the background of Barack Obama may spell big trouble ahead regarding the issue of Presidential eligibility.
The investigation was conducted by Northeast Intelligence Network—a team of experienced, professional private investigators whose services have been utilized by Fortune-500 companies. The director, Douglas J. Hagmann, is a 23-year veteran in high-level investigations and is a member of the International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association.
Hagmann’s investigation into the background and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of the United States is extensive and thorough. His conclusions are stunning.
(AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall).
For example, neither of Obama’s parents were citizens of the United States at the time of his birth. Therefore, Obama would have to have been born on U.S. soil in order to qualify as a ‘natural born citizen’ according to the qualifications specified in the Constitution.
But Hagmann’s investigation reveals that, contrary to the notion of those who point to a short-form birth certificate in Hawaii, and 2 birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers, neither of these factors proves anything at all about Obama’s status or citizenship:
the Certification of Live Birth is consistently cited by individuals, the media and others to prove the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA. Nonetheless, even an authenticated and genuine Certification of Live Birth is legally insufficient for the purpose of proving eligibility, as it merely represents that OBAMA’s birth record is on file in the state of Hawaii. It falls short of providing the information necessary to determine constitutional eligibility in at least two areas: it does not offer any information regarding who supplied the information, nor does it confirm the authenticity of the information provided. Again, it merely indicates that the information is “on file.”
In other words, the ‘certification of live birth’ as touted by Obama apologists and the mainstream media as ‘proof’ Obama meets the eligibility requirements of the Constitution actually proves nothing.
In addition, Hagmann disputes the notion that birth announcements in local Hawaiian newspapers provide proof:
Many who argue that Barack Hussein OBAMA II was born in Hawaii not only point to the COLB as direct evidence of eligibility, but they also point to two separate birth announcements that appear in the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin in 1961. Those doing so either fail to understand the legal definition of a natural born citizen as it applies to the eligibility factor, or are guilty of intentionally misdirecting the core issue. A birth announcement is simply that – a public announcement that a baby was born. The birth announcements do not provide any information about the child’s citizenship, cannot be authenticated, and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument.
However, the key information in Hagmann’s report that casts doubts upon Obama’s eligibility is the fact that the very organizations that published the short-form certificate of live birth and the 2 birth announcements in newspapers have direct connections with Barack Obama.
The DailyKos is the primary suspect and the first entity to publish ‘proof’ of a birth certificate. The DailyKos is an ultra-Leftwing hate-group that not only is ‘in the tank’ for Obama but smears and seeks to destroy those who oppose extremist, Leftwing initiatives in politics.
‘Fight the Smears,’ which also pointed to these 2 erroneous pieces of ‘evidence,’ is owned by ‘Organizing for America,’ which was originally named ‘Obama for America.’ This speaks for itself.
And finally, there is the much-hallowed ‘Factcheck.org’—supposedly an independent, non-partisan clearinghouse that separates truth from fiction in the media and on the Internet. Hagmann’s investigation reveals that Factcheck is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which receives its primary funding from the Annenberg Foundation.
Barack Obama was a founding member, chairman, and past President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was also funded by the Annenberg Foundation. Thus, the supposed ‘neutrality’ of Factcheck.org can safely be called into question.
The bottom line is that so far absolutely no positive proof has been provided that establishes that Barack Obama was born on American soil.
Why is this important? An individual who would spend millions of dollars hiding his background and pertinent documents from the public, and who would make false statements about about his history, cannot be trusted to tell the American people the truth about what his policy initiatives are intended to do regarding the ‘fundamental change’ of America.
bump
The second greatest scandal is that many “Americans are accomoplices in his treason-or he would not have been ‘elected’
If Beck can get out of this alive he MUST have divine protection. He is standing between a bunch of psychopaths and all the money in the world.
sfl
Thank you. Have you read the article and listened to the videos?
One needs evidence, about treason and matters of intra/international warfare.
“Americans are accomoplices in his treason”
About 40% of them. The others got sucked in.
ping
bkmk
“In addition, Hagmann disputes the notion that birth announcements in local Hawaiian newspapers provide proof:”
**************************
At best, they are hearsay and circumstantial evidence.
The key rule of law here is The Best Evidence Rule, and that rule requires production of the AUTHENTIC long form BC. Once that is produced, it can be reviewed and analyzed, and the law can be applied to the facts as they appear in that document.
“Birthers” and other like-minded supporters do not have to figure out what the truth is until the best evidence is revealed. There are enough pieces of evidence to suggest he is not a NBC, and it follows that there is a rebuttable presumption that he is NOT natural born citizen.
He has had every opportunity to rebut that presumption by producing his authentic BC. His failure to do so creates a reasonable inference that he is not legit, and does NOT have the goods.
All of that “stunning” information is well known to most Freepers and has been for the better part of a year...
Regardless of what would come of it, it needs to be looked into by Congress. If they are not willing to do this, they should all be fired.
True, but it needs to be kept in front of new Freepers as well as old members.
This didn’t affectively knock down the newspaper announcements. That’s really the smoking gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.