Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury convicts Palin e-mail intruder on two counts
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 4/30/10

Posted on 04/30/2010 12:21:13 PM PDT by SmithL

KNOXVILLE — A federal jury this afternoon convicted Sarah Palin e-mail intruder David C. Kernell of felony destruction of records to hamper a federal investigation and misdemeanor unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer.

The jury acquitted Kernell, 22, of wire fraud.

It remains deadlocked on felony identity theft.

It’s unclear if U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Phillips will order the jurors, in their fourth day of deliberations, to continue.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; 2010electionbbias; cultureofcorruption; davidckernell; davidkernell; dncbrownshirts; getpalin; hacker; hacking; howtostealanelection; kernell; movealong; nothingtoseehere; palin; palinemails; palinfreeperping; palinkernellhacker; pravdamedia; ratcrime; sarahpalin; sonofademocrat; watergate2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: aphid
My family and I appreciate the good people of Knoxville, Tennessee, who showed us true Southern hospitality. We can’t wait to visit again – but without having a subpoena in hand.

Proud to have ya. Ya'll come back now, y'hear?

41 posted on 04/30/2010 12:55:15 PM PDT by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

He was convicted on counts three and four.

Charges, possible sentence

Count one: identity theft
Maximum five years in prison
$250,000 fine
Three years supervised release

Count two: wire fraud
Maximum 20 years in prison
$250,000 fine
Five years supervised release

Count three: unlawful computer access
Maximum five years in prison
$250,000 fine
Three years supervised release
Lesser included misdemeanor offense on count three carries a maximum of one year in prison

Count four: obstruction of justice
Maximum 20 years in prison
$250,000 fine
Five years supervised release


42 posted on 04/30/2010 12:56:02 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: free me

With more than 20 years prison as the maximum, I would be appalled (but not amazed) if he didn’t have to go to prison for at least two years.


43 posted on 04/30/2010 12:57:24 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Here is a statement that Sarah just released

My family and I are thankful that the jury thoroughly and carefully weighed the evidence and issued a just verdict. Besides the obvious invasion of privacy and security concerns surrounding this issue, many of us are concerned about the integrity of our country’s political elections. America’s elections depend upon fair competition. Violating the law, or simply invading someone’s privacy for political gain, has long been repugnant to Americans’ sense of fair play. As Watergate taught us, we rightfully reject illegally breaking into candidates’ private communications for political intrigue in an attempt to derail an election.

“I want to thank the public servants who worked so hard on this case, particularly the jurors who gave up precious time from their jobs and families to listen to the evidence and reach a decision.

My family and I appreciate the good people of Knoxville, Tennessee, who showed us true Southern hospitality. We can’t wait to visit again – but without having a subpoena in hand. “

- Sarah Palin


44 posted on 04/30/2010 12:59:22 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
David Kernell, right, leaves the Federal Courthouse with his mother, Lt. Col. Lillian Landrigan, behind left, and attorney Wade Davies, front left, Ton Thursday in Knoxville.
By Wade Payne, AP
David Kernell, right, leaves the Federal Courthouse with his mother, Lt. Col. Lillian Landrigan, behind left, and attorney Wade Davies, front left, Ton Thursday in Knoxville.

45 posted on 04/30/2010 1:01:26 PM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
He's somewhat of a soft-looking pretty boy....but he won't have to worry about Big Bubba in Club Fed.

Because of his age, looks, apparent softness plus the high political profile of his daddy he'll be placed in segregated quarters if he does any hard time at all.

Law enforcement will not chance anything happening to him. This is okay with me as long as he does time. Sarah doesn't need her name coupled with anything sordid that may be connected with this creep's time in prison....and he can fade into the memory hole as far as I'm concerned.

Congrats to Sarah for her stick-to-it-iveness.....something other spineless politicians may have shied away from. Justice was served.

Leni

46 posted on 04/30/2010 1:02:33 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport

He was convicted on counts three and four.

Charges, possible sentence

Count one: identity theft
Maximum five years in prison
$250,000 fine
Three years supervised release

Count two: wire fraud
Maximum 20 years in prison
$250,000 fine
Five years supervised release

Count three: unlawful computer access
Maximum five years in prison
$250,000 fine
Three years supervised release
Lesser included misdemeanor offense on count three carries a maximum of one year in prison

Count four: obstruction of justice
Maximum 20 years in prison
$250,000 fine
Five years supervised release

Wasn’t he found guilty of the lesser misdemeanor offense of the unlawful computer access? Which only allows a maximum of one year in prison for that charge?


47 posted on 04/30/2010 1:06:18 PM PDT by formerliberal_nowconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Jail? You are kidding right? More likely he’ll get a cabinet level appointment from ‘Zero’!

Homeland Security

48 posted on 04/30/2010 1:07:10 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: formerliberal_nowconservative

He’ll do time on the OJ charge. Judges seriously frown on that.


49 posted on 04/30/2010 1:38:47 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All

TOTALLY agree with you on that. I guess we’ll see what the judge decides.

Does anyone know the MINIMUM on Felony Obstruction, or does the judge have a lot of leeway in the sentencing on this charge?


50 posted on 04/30/2010 2:02:47 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: formerliberal_nowconservative

Agreed. Do you know if there is anything like a mandatory minimum on these charges, or are those ONLY reserved for drug charges?


51 posted on 04/30/2010 2:03:58 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

Yes, but is there a MINIMUM sentence the judge MUST give him? If not the kid could get out on probation with a large fine instead (especially considering who his father is).


52 posted on 04/30/2010 2:05:30 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

I don’t know that there is a minimum:

Count four: obstruction of justice
Maximum 20 years in prison
$250,000 fine
Five years supervised release


53 posted on 04/30/2010 2:06:35 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks, I appreciate it. Have looked back through the posts and see I’m not the only one asking! Sorry about that! :)


54 posted on 04/30/2010 2:08:28 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; Sarah Barracuda

There’s hope, he’ll do the right thing.

The judge is a Tennessee native and likely a Republican, not a democrat. He’s a Vandy grad, former JAG and appointed by GWB.


55 posted on 04/30/2010 2:23:28 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sweet. There is hope! That is good news... Thanks for sharing that with me. I didn’t know that about the judge. (Haven’t followed this as closely as I would have liked)


56 posted on 04/30/2010 2:30:20 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

The act of changing her password while signed on using her identity constitutes identity theft, plain and simple.

- JP


57 posted on 04/30/2010 2:30:42 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("Every time a Democrat mocks Sarah Palin, an independent gets its wings." - JP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Yes, and he graduated from Vandy in ‘69, so he’s not a young judge looking to make a name for himself on Sarah’s back. I will pray tonight that he does right by the jury’s verdict and by Sarah who suffered because of this smart-ass punk.


58 posted on 04/30/2010 2:39:37 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
sad thing is, his parental units are prolly proud of him...
59 posted on 04/30/2010 2:45:16 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I’ll be joining you in those prayers — and for the jurors as well that they can come to some resolution on the final charge they are deadlocked on.

Do you have any idea what happens if the jury ends up “hung” on that other charge? Do their other verdicts stick, or is it a mistrial?


60 posted on 04/30/2010 2:47:00 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson