Skip to comments.A DISASTER WITHOUT PRECEDENT
Posted on 04/30/2010 10:22:46 PM PDT by Cedar
Federal and state officials pushed oil giant BP to intensify its efforts to cap a leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico and to contain the slick that is threatening the shores and livelihoods of people in five states.
As crude oil began to come ashore in Louisiana, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar met with the company's top executives and engineers and urged them to "work harder and faster and smarter to get the job done," he said.
"We cannot rest and we will not rest until BP permanently seals the wellhead and until they clean up every drop of oil," Salazar said.
Heavy winds and high tides impeded efforts to contain the growing slick on Friday, and oil continued to gush from the damaged exploration well, sending pungent odors through neighborhoods near New Orleans. Governors from the region expressed frustration at the company's inability to get the situation under control.
The widening crisis began April 20, when Deepwater Horizon, a drilling rig owned by Transocean and leased by BP, caught fire and sank, killing 11 people. Ten days later, coastal residents, state officials and environmental groups began to question whether the oil industry and Interior Department regulators had done enough to prepare for such a catastrophic accident.
Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen said in an interview Friday that the company's plans for responding to oil spills did not address the complete failure of equipment on the sea floor designed to prevent a blowout of the sort that took place on the massive drilling rig.
"We're breaking new ground here. It's hard to write a plan for a catastrophic event that has no precedent, which is what this was," Allen said, defending the company against not writing a response for "what could never be in a plan, what you couldn't anticipate."
Hammond Eve, who did environmental impact studies of offshore drilling for the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service (MMS), said the federal agency never planned for response to an oil spill of this size. "We never imagined that it would happen because the safety measures were supposed to work and prevent it from happening," he said.
He added that MMS began from the "premise that if something like this happened that it would be shut down fairly soon and a discrete amount of oil would be released and these clean-up measures would begin and you would never end up with a situation like this."
Eve, who lives on the water 20 miles east of New Orleans, said strong oil fumes were engulfing his neighborhood. "You can't breathe the air comfortably," he said. "It bites you right in the back of the throat and your eyeballs burn."
Obama administration officials fanned out across the Gulf of Mexico states pledging attention and assistance. In an already troubled economy, the oil slick threatened to damage the region's fishing and tourism industries as well as disrupt shipping along the Mississippi River.
On Friday, Louisiana's departments of Health and Hospitals and Wildlife and Fisheries announced severe restrictions on fishing and oyster harvesting east of the Mississippi River.
"I do have concerns that BP's current resources are not adequate to meet the challenges that we face," Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said at a news conference in New Orleans. "I've urged them to seek even more help from the federal government and from others."
In Washington, President Barack Obama said that "BP is ultimately responsible under the law for paying the costs of response and cleanup operations, but we are fully prepared to meet our responsibilities to any and all affected communities."
He said there were now five staging areas to protect sensitive shorelines and approximately 1,900 federal response personnel and more than 300 vessels and aircraft on the scene.
"We've also laid approximately 217,000 feet of protective boom, and there are more on the way," Obama said.
"It's a two-front war," said the Coast Guard's Allen. "The center of this whole thing is the leakage on the bottom," he said, adding that the priority is capping the leak. "If we don't do that we are going to be fighting an endless oil spill on the top."
The oil spill has buffeted BP, whose stock price has plunged more than 13 percent this week, wiping out about $20 billion of market value.
"We are doing absolutely everything in our power to eliminate the source of the leak and contain the environmental impact of the spill," BP chief executive Tony Hayward said in a statement.
"We are determined to fight this spill on all fronts, in the deep waters of the Gulf, in the shallow waters and, should it be necessary, on the shore."
He said the company welcomed offers of assistance from government agencies, other oil companies and even members of the public.
An official at the Organized Seafood Association of Alabama said his group would meet on Saturday with BP representatives about possible compensation for lost fishing income.
But some people said the company, in addition to bearing financial responsibility under a 1990 law, also bore responsibility for being too optimistic in its planning.
In the exploration plan that BP Exploration and Production Inc. submitted to the MMS for the Mississippi Canyon Block 252 lease on Feb. 23, 2009, the company expressed confidence it could handle a spill even larger than the one caused by the explosion at Deepwater Horizon.
It said the company "has the capability to respond to the appropriate worst-case spill scenario," which it defines in a chart as a "volume uncontrolled blowout" of 300,000 gallons a day.
On April 6, 2009 MMS approved the drilling with a warning: "Exercise caution while drilling due to indications of shallow gas and possible water flow."
MMS officials said they could not comment on the Deepwater Horizon incident, but added that the agency was reassessing the way it judges companies' abilities to cope with spills.
The cause of the well explosion remains uncertain.
Oil industry experts say that in deep-water wells such as this one, which was drilled in water 5,000 feet deep, high pressure increases the risks of a blowout.
BP has pointed a finger at Transocean, which owned and operated the rig.
Transocean has pointed at a company called Cameron, which made a key valve in the malfunctioning blowout preventer.
John Amos, who spent 10 years as a consulting exploration geologist for oil and gas companies and now heads SkyTruth, an operation that uses government satellite imagery to monitor environmental disasters, said he was not surprised that both oil executives and federal officials failed to properly forecast the risks associated with offshore drilling.
"Just like the explosion of a volcano, to a geologist like myself, these kinds of incidents are fairly predictable, but when they happen, they come as a shock to us," Amos said.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., whose panel has already sent letters to BP America, Transocean and oil services giant Halliburton inquiring into the cause of the explosion and the companies' inability to staunch the flow of oil, said he hoped to get more answers when officials from the three companies testified before his committee on May 12.
Halliburton was in charge of cementing for Deepwater Horizon -- plugging holes in the pipeline seal by pumping cement into it from the rig.
"The companies have the obligation, it seems to me, to have a plan, to anticipate and do what they could to prevent this sort of thing from happening," Waxman said in an interview. "They obviously didn't anticipate this."
Staff writer Juliet Eilperin contributed to this article
” $7.00 dollar a gallon gasoline “
No! Here comes $10.00 per gallon gasoline.
$10 gas? In that case, here comes the electric car to the forefront!
It’s no disaster!
When I was a kid more oil than that boiled to the surface NATURALLY 24/7 and wound up on the braches from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border and the only harm was that when i went to the beach I got scrubed down in a washtub with kerosene to remove the tar before I could come in the house.
I doesn’t happen today because of the offshore oil drilling that reduced the gas presure and only a small amount, comparatavially, boils up today.
Didn’t realize. How did the wildlife survive along those beaches?
Read the article excerpt posted at this link:
“25,000 barrel-a-day leak rate” is the current estimate and it could go to 100,000 barrels a day. At just the 25K rate, it rivals the Exxon Valdez spill.
This really is a disaster, unfortunately.
“How did the wildlife survive along those beaches?”
The ones that dies of old age washed up on the beach covered with tar!
“This really is a disaster, unfortunately.”
No damn way and neither was Valdez!!!!
just bookmarking an interesting article. :)
OK, I am just a bystander and have no special knowledge of the area nor the oil industry. You do. So question, please. Was there that much oil washing up on the coast when you were a kid? Those enviro programs about the Valdez spill made it look so bad that I would never have guessed that things could be that way naturally.
I did not mean to offend you, I just have never heard anyone talk about that nor have I ever read it anywhere.
There was so much tar on the beach atr Goleta that in the 1500s the Spanish beached their ships to tar thew bottoms.
In the 50s when I was going with my wife you couldn’t even go on the beach at slough U, UC Santa Barbara, because there was so much tar.
Clear into the late 60s there was an oil slick from the Horshoe Kelp to the Mexican border because of the oil boiling to the surface from that spot 7 miles off Long Beach.
I’ll bet you very few people know that. The ironic thing about what you said is that the whole area is a lot better off today BECAUSE of the oil rigs in the Gulf, even with the rare spill like this one. I wish someone would write an article about it and come up with some old photos that showed what it looked like with the natural oil to prove it.
I don’t think eco-nuts would want to cause a ecological disaster of this scale just to stop off-shore drilling. The drilling itself is absolutely nothing ecology-wise compared to what this oil is going to do to the coastal wetlands of Louisiana.
It wouldn’t have been very good advertising for the tourist industry - maybe that’s why no one seems to know about it other than people like you who had personal experience. Or maybe it just suits the enviro agenda to ignore it. That knowledge would sure mess with them now.
Eh, I hope not. This is only one of thousands and thousands of rigs in the Gulf alone.
The people in Mississippi and Louisiana who are in the fishing industry are in huge trouble this year financially...they better find another career asap...at least for five years or so. Alaska fisherman felt the financial burden for about that long.
You ever hear of the LaBrea tar pits? There is a lot of oil and tar close to the surface in Southern California. Offshore of Santa Barbara there are natural seeps where oil seeps up out of the ocean floor. It’s still going on but due to our oil wells there is less. Due to less pressure. Our oil wells relive that pressure
Beachcombing at Goleta Point (posted June 6, 2002)
"What you'll need: Be sure to wear surf-shoes or old sneakers to avoid getting tar on your feet on the beach near the tidewater oil field. Bring sunscreen, a hat or visor and two quarts of water for today's long beach walk. Dogs are not allowed on the beach."
Downtown Los Angeles has natural tar seeps (most famously, the La Brea Tar Pits seeps at Curzon and Wilshire). It's a part of the landscape.
There’s a pretty small percentage of the population that were beach goers in So. California in the 40s and 50s that are still around.
Besides that no one gave a damn back then since environmentalists hadn’t been invented!
If we could get rid of the enviro nuts and use the oil in So. California on shore and off we vould supply the US for a few hundred years.
The main reason that the California wells have been shut down is taxes, which when added up from the ground to pump were 78% in 1954, the last year that it was quoated to me by the President of the independant oil producers of Calif. and VPs of Union Oil.
The crowning blow was the 10% wellhead tax that Carter put in in 74 that he called an excess profit tax.
Joe Shell, a friend of mine had 3 wildcat wells going and the day Carter put in that tax BofA who was financing them called him up and pulled his financing.
After that their attitude was that import the oil and let the Arabs pay the taxes and that someday they will take off the tax and the oil will be worth something.
He said that it might be his grand kids or great grand kids but that there wasn’t any reason to give most of it away to the government and only produce enough to make a good living.
“Beachcombing at Goleta Point (posted June 6, 2002)”
By 2000 there wasn’t 10% of what it was in the mid 50s because of the oil rigs in the Santa Barbara channel reducing the natural flow.
In the 50s, no one but a stupid tourist would ever go to that beachQQ
Natural Oil Seeps: Gulf of Mexico
February 25, 2009 | NASA / Geology.com
Oil spills caused by humans almost always make big headlines but did you know that natural seeps contribute significant amounts of oil to the environment? Here is a pair of satellite images from NASAs Earth Observatory that illustrate natural oil seeps.
|Satellite image of natural oil seeps in the Gulf of Mexico by Jesse Allen, NASA. See zoomed-in below.|
|Satellite image of natural oil seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Jesse Allen, NASA. See above for reference.|
This was just last February--February 2009.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.