Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Political Future for an All-White G.O.P
Townhall.com ^ | May 5, 2010 | Michael Medved

Posted on 05/05/2010 7:18:19 AM PDT by Kaslin

With a record number of black candidates seeking Republican nominations in upcoming congressional races, the GOP may finally make progress in facing the most serious menace to its survival: the lack of support from any significant segment of the nonwhite population.

Not all of the 33 African-American contenders will win their primary contests, let alone the general election, but at least a half-dozen of them face promising prospects and could provide new energy for a party that desperately needs to shatter its lily-white image.

There are no Republicans among the present 41 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, or among the 24 members of the Hispanic Caucus -- an absence that reflects the party's woeful performance among minority voters in recent elections and may threaten its very existence.

Consider the historic campaign of 2008, when President Barack Obama bested John McCain by a solid margin of 7.2 percentage points. According to the authoritative exit polls, the vast majority of voters (74 percent) identified themselves as "white," and McCain won a landslide among this segment of the electorate, thrashing Obama by a resounding 12 points (55 percent to 43 percent). This was the same margin that George W. Bush commanded among white voters in his 2000 victory over Al Gore. In fact, because of the larger electorate, McCain's losing effort actually drew 9.5 million more votes overall than Bush's victorious campaign of eight years before.

Why, then, did Bush win the White House while McCain suffered humiliating defeat? The answer is that in eight years the nonwhite portion of electorate soared -- from 19 percent of voters to 26 percent of voters. Among these voters, Obama won by a 4-to-1 margin -- easily wiping out McCain's big advantage among white voters.

For two reasons, these numbers command close attention for anyone concerned about the Republican future.

First, there is no chance that white voters will ever again comprise 74 percent of the electorate. Most projections for 2012 suggest that self-identified whites will comprise 70 percent or, at most, 72 percent of those who cast presidential ballots.

Second, it would be hard for any Republican to improve significantly on McCain's hefty 12-point margin among whites, which means that without an improved showing among Hispanics, blacks and Asians, GOP contenders will lose every time.

The math here is brutal and eye-opening. If Obama in 2012 wins the same percentage of the combined black, Asian and Hispanic vote that he won in 2008 (82 percent), then in order to beat him the GOP candidate would need to win an unimaginable 65 percent of all white voters -- whose numbers include such stalwart Democratic constituencies as gays, atheists, Jews and union members.

The 65 percent threshold represents a far higher percentage than Ronald Reagan won in his landslide against Jimmy Carter in 1980, or even his history-making 49-state re-election-sweep against Walter Mondale in '84.

Since white voters won't comprise larger portions of the electorate in future races, and since no Republican could compile a big enough white majority to win the election on those voters alone, that leaves only one possible path for GOP victory: more competitive performance among Hispanic, African-American and Asian citizens.

Fortunately, recent history demonstrates that such competition is possible. In 2004, the exit polls showed that Bush earned 44 percent of both Latino and Asian voters, and 11 percent of the black vote. This represents a huge advantage over the sorry performance of McCain.

Running against Obama, no Republican could have won a big percentage of the African-American community, but if McCain had merely won the same percentage as Bush four years before, he would have drawn 1.2 million more black votes for the GOP ticket -- an obviously meaningful difference in any close election.

Winning an electoral majority doesn't require capturing, or even splitting, every ethnic group, but no candidate can prevail if he (or she) gets overwhelmed among all nonwhite voters. In this context, the GOP doesn't need to win with each of the 33 black Republicans in current congressional contests, or even with most of them.

But if any of them carry their districts in November, it will help change the GOP image as a whites-only political organization and rejuvenate the once-vibrant party of Lincoln and Reagan that is still struggling against marginalization and irrelevance.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: medved; michaelmedved; racecard; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-127 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2010 7:18:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Michael Medved”

Uber-RINO.


2 posted on 05/05/2010 7:19:57 AM PDT by Grunthor (Over YOUR dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not unless white folks smarten up and see the train coming at them.


3 posted on 05/05/2010 7:20:19 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"There are no Republicans among the present 41 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, or among the 24 members of the Hispanic Caucus...."

Tell me again why the Democrats continue the policy of segregation? Oh that's right, they're Democrats...

4 posted on 05/05/2010 7:20:45 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Allen West, Allen Keyes, Ken Blackwell, Michael ((shudder)) Steele......


5 posted on 05/05/2010 7:21:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

ah, another pigment prism politico...


6 posted on 05/05/2010 7:21:23 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It really is staggering for ANYONE to point to McCain in 2008 as an example of not pandering to the Hispanic vote. McCain was the lead Senator for shamnesty and what good did it do him?


7 posted on 05/05/2010 7:22:07 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, dear, the dreaded WHITE people.


8 posted on 05/05/2010 7:22:37 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

A cocktail party “conservative”...


9 posted on 05/05/2010 7:22:40 AM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

lol is Republican party all white??????i think thats what Dems want people to think.


10 posted on 05/05/2010 7:22:48 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The demographics are already in place. In about 20 years, the majority of America’s population will belong to one or another of various minority groups.

Clearly, the Republican party needs to make inroads among these minority groups to thrive. If too many minority voters default to the Democrat party, this spells political trouble for Republicans.

The good news, though, is that many minority voters can be attracted by Republican views on issues such as national security, capitalism, taxes, individual liberty, etc. If Republicans can slice off a big enough group of these minority voters on the issues, then the Republican party will thrive in the years ahead.


11 posted on 05/05/2010 7:23:41 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Medved. Reformed liberal. So much for the reformation. Michael still thinks like a liberal. It's the color of the ideas that matters Michael. You'll never get it will you?
12 posted on 05/05/2010 7:23:51 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The GOP is ‘all white’ only on the evening news.

This author needs to take his head out of his a&^!


13 posted on 05/05/2010 7:24:40 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

If whites voted for the GOP like blacks vote for Rats..we wouldn’t have a problem.
The trouble with MM’s proposal is that we have to put political power above the future of the country. At least we need to go down fighting. Blacks and Hispanics seem to be a majority of the socialists and parasites on our country..pandering to them will only drive us into the drink..just witness those states where the politicians have alread drunk his koolaide.


14 posted on 05/05/2010 7:24:41 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Zimbabwe anyone?


15 posted on 05/05/2010 7:25:08 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There are no Republicans among the present 41 members of the Congressional Black Caucus...

When JC Watts was in Congress, they wouldn't allow him in.

16 posted on 05/05/2010 7:25:32 AM PDT by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

How about assessing some blame where it belongs? When 90-95% of the black population, for instance, votes like socialist kooks why bother to try? Should the Republicans court that? Look at the CBC. There are 30-40 of them. Name one that isn’t a kook.

If any Republican blacks win they won’t be winning in majority-black districts most likely. Blacks have won lots of freedoms, except for the right to have an independent political thought.


17 posted on 05/05/2010 7:27:08 AM PDT by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

“Uber-RINO”???

Are you familiar with this man and his writings?


18 posted on 05/05/2010 7:27:21 AM PDT by dorothy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am still trying to figure out why African-Americans have embraced the party who fought with the South in the civil war, the party who was against segregation, the party who has has (and still has) KKK members in it’s ranks. How can they ignore this? I wish I could understand.


19 posted on 05/05/2010 7:27:26 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In other news, the Democrat Party is in danger of loosing appeal for adherence to all Marxist policies and a general condemnation of taxpayers, white citizens of europeon decent and people who believe in the American Constitution.

This radical destructive agenda is sure to become more and more obvious despite the brain washing or academics, arts and culture leftists and the dying leftist media all promoting the thinking that allows the subversion of the Leftists.


20 posted on 05/05/2010 7:27:44 AM PDT by KC Burke (...but He has made the trains run on time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If whites voted for republicans with the same kind of numbers that blacks vote for democrats republicans would win every election.


21 posted on 05/05/2010 7:28:41 AM PDT by Cubs Fan (The Obama Presidency, just over a year old, and already the worst in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

I meant DESEGREGATION (the s and d are very close on the keyboard:( )


22 posted on 05/05/2010 7:29:15 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I seem to recall that, and they probably wouldn’t still let any conservative African American, or any conservative from another race in


23 posted on 05/05/2010 7:29:21 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There are no Republicans among the present 41 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, or among the 24 members of the Hispanic Caucus -- an absence that reflects the party's woeful performance among minority voters in recent elections and may threaten its very existence.

I would not want Republicans to join those organizations anyway.

I stopped reading about here, so did he even mention Micheal Steele?

24 posted on 05/05/2010 7:29:55 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The best advice to conservatives, if you ever get a desire to listen to Medved....don't.

He should have been on PSB or Air America. He's two blinks away from being a leftie liberal. I can listen for 5 minutes, and my blood is boiling at his leftie nonsense.

He a liberal in conservative clothing, nothing to see or hear...worth seeing or listeing to.
25 posted on 05/05/2010 7:30:00 AM PDT by FrankR (Standing up against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future will belong to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I didn’t know Michael Medved is running for office


26 posted on 05/05/2010 7:30:19 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

Yep, politically speaking, you look at some big cities such as Detroit, where there is no political competition. Such cities are disaster areas, and, all are run by Democrats. There are no competitive elections in too many places.

There’s no reason why 90+% of blacks should automatically vote Democrat, but, both parties seem to take this fact for granted.


27 posted on 05/05/2010 7:30:28 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

It’s become readily apparent that the two ideological groups cannot live under the same political jurisdiction.

We must separate ourselves, probably along state lines, in order to avoid a bloody civil war.

We insist on being free, they insist on enslaving us.
We’d like to insist they be responsible for themselves, they refuse.


28 posted on 05/05/2010 7:30:31 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hate these ‘Black, White, Latino, female’ lables and articles about the GOP. The party is based on a philosophy (smaler government, lower taxes, states rights, etc etc). It is not based on race. Any man or woman who relates to these philosophies is welcome in the GOP. The fact that most minorites associate with Dems just goes to show how effective the Dems have been at convincing monorites that they are helpless and hapless.

Here’s my message to minorites....and whites for that matter. You guys are great, capable, and talented!!! You don’t need the government. Come help us make an America full of independent determined self reliant people. We need your help and input!!!


29 posted on 05/05/2010 7:30:57 AM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
lol is Republican party all white??????i think thats what Dems want people to think.

and RINO's always go with the liberal meme, why is that?

30 posted on 05/05/2010 7:31:18 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Actually Hispanic is not a race


31 posted on 05/05/2010 7:31:30 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Such cluelessness.

It’s not a lack of ‘diversity’ which is demolishing the GOP.

It is a lack of spine, and principle.

STAND TALL. Then people will follow. Even yes, people who aren’t white.


32 posted on 05/05/2010 7:31:37 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"White" is not a precise category, anyhow. Politically speaking, it really means "mainstream."

Minorities, for the most part, join the mainstream eventually.

So, minorities will come into the GOP, but not necessarily as minorities. Remember, the Irish and Italians were once "minorities." Prosperous Chinese, Japanese and Korean Americans are in the process of losing their "minority-ness." So, pandering to ethnic interests will not accomplish much, apart from alienating conservatives who believe in meritocracy.

Leave the identity politics to the Democrats. Principle will win out eventually.

33 posted on 05/05/2010 7:31:59 AM PDT by B Knotts (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who cares. If they are solid conservatives their skin color is irrelevant.


34 posted on 05/05/2010 7:32:56 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There is no future for a Democrat Party composed solely of blacks, Hispanics and single white urban women either.


35 posted on 05/05/2010 7:33:07 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; writer33
But if any of them carry their districts in November, it will help change the GOP image as a whites-only political organization and rejuvenate the once-vibrant party

Is Medved retarded? Any black Republican in Congress will be treated as a race traitor by the MSM. They will be treated like Justice Clarence Thomas is treated.

36 posted on 05/05/2010 7:33:40 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

Of course they do. They also want the people to think that Conservatives are racist, which instead the rats are


37 posted on 05/05/2010 7:34:12 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Who was counting?

Is Medved a looking to become a race-baiting ambulance chaser? Somebody should tell him Sharpton and Jackson have a lock on that market.

38 posted on 05/05/2010 7:34:56 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

I think African-Americans embraced the Democrats because of President Johnson. He worked to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Before that time, black voters didn’t vote as a bloc for Democrats.

Of course, the untold story there is that many Democrats opposed those laws. But that inconvenient truth is lost in the story of the good Democrat, President Johnson, finally delivering on civil rights legislation.


39 posted on 05/05/2010 7:35:00 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: avacado; Kaslin

My opinion is that the dems look for people they can control easily and to a lesser extent so do the repubs. By control is meant ‘graft’ and other means that are coosidered distasteful by those possessing a moral conscience. Hence, GOP black and hispanic Americans are a cut above those of the dems.


40 posted on 05/05/2010 7:35:41 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How is my problem if minorities are politically stupid? I can’t change over to the stupid side.


41 posted on 05/05/2010 7:36:53 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m starting to think the plan is to have no whites in any office...


42 posted on 05/05/2010 7:37:48 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I disagree. I don’t believe the typical black voter has any bond in remembrance of LBJ. What they do have is a sense that they can command a better price for their votes from the democrats. They sell to the highest bidder.

The democrats are the party of panderers or political panhandlers. The urban black enclaves understand this.


43 posted on 05/05/2010 7:38:57 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s apparent non-whites are racists.


44 posted on 05/05/2010 7:38:59 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Didn’t the 14th ammendment make them equal under the Constitution? (Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong)


45 posted on 05/05/2010 7:39:22 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There shouldn’t be any such thing as a “congressional black caucus” or “hispanic caucus”. It’s racist on the face of it.


46 posted on 05/05/2010 7:40:00 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

That’s not true; Congressman Watts refused to join, saying that if there wasn’t a Congressional White Caucus there shouldn’t be a Congressional Black Caucus.

Hispanic Republicans in Congress used to belong to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, but they all quit a few years ago because of the group’s liberal agenda and formed the Congressional Hispanic Conference for Republicans.


47 posted on 05/05/2010 7:40:30 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

It is true, however.


48 posted on 05/05/2010 7:40:52 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think a point a lot of these analyst are missing is the assumption that whites will always vote in the same ways they are today. As the white population drops from a firm majority to the largest of several minorities, I think whites will start doing what every other minority group has done and vote for the party they feel best represents their race. It may already be happening, 50 years ago white voters were almost evenly split between the two parties. Now whites routinely vote republican by a 10 or 12 point margin. As the democrat party becomes more a black/hispanic party due to the large increases in both populations, white democrats, even the very liberal, are going to be less welcome in the party. So I don't think it's out of the question to assume that 75% or 80% of whites will vote Republican 30 years from now. I honestly believe that although the racial makeup will be vastly different, elections in 30 years will look pretty much the same as elections today.
49 posted on 05/05/2010 7:41:28 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Medved veers into strange territory as proclaimed conservative.
The Republican party used to be the party of the Blacks until the democrats pushed the racial agenda beginning with Roosevelt.

The party of entitlement has captured the black vote and how does Medved propose to change that?


50 posted on 05/05/2010 7:42:11 AM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson