Posted on 05/10/2010 9:36:28 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
Speculation continues to swirl about the sexual preference of likely Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan. She is apparently out to her friends and others in her academic and social circles, but not out to the public at large.
The White House has flatly stated that she is not gay, which could prove a tad embarrassing if the open secret of her lesbianism is confirmed at some point. If she's a lesbian, it is going to become public knowledge, and the White House will simply have some more egg on its already yoke-splattered face.
Elena Kagan, if nominated today, will be forced to face the press. She cannot be kept closeted not only from the public but from the inquiring minds of the media. They have a solemn responsibility to do one thing: ask her directly and openly and in front of the American people: Are you a lesbian?
A refusal to answer is a tacit admission of guilt. But she may not be able publicly to deny she's a lesbian, likely because it's true. She may not be able to admit it either, because it could cost her a Supreme Court post. So she's likely to refuse to answer the question at all, and the only plausible explanation for her evasion would be because rumors of her lesbianism aren't rumors at all but based in fact.
Think about it for a minute. If you were falsely accused of engaging in sexually aberrant behavior, would you waste a single minute challenging such a scurrilous rumor?
Even lesbian websites are agreeing with me about the importance of Ms. Kagan declaring herself on this matter. For instance, from LezGetReal, "A Gay Girl's View on The World:"
"If she is not a lesbian, she needs to come out and say it, and put to rest the rumours and concerns. If she is gay, I believe she needs to say that too, and quickly. While being gay is not a shameful thing, being chased out of the closet can certainly make a person appear weak and lacking in integrity."
I expect the White House is in full lockdown mode this morning, trying to figure out how to finesse the subject of her sexual preference, exploring all the possible scenarios - including the one that they told a flat-out lie when they said she was straight - and counting on a morally benumbed America to give them a pass on an important moral question.
One qualification for public office is personal character, and nothing speaks to character more than the choices one makes when it comes to sexual conduct. Bill Clinton convinced an entire generation of America's youth that oral sex isn't really sex, and as a result we've seen an explosion among millenials in cancers of the throat and head caused by the HPV virus, which is spread through oral-genital contact.
It's time we got over the myth that what a public servant does in his private life is of no consequence. We cannot afford to have another sexually abnormal individual in a position of important civic responsibility, especially when that individual could become one of nine votes in an out of control oligarchy that constantly usurps constitutional prerogatives to unethically and illegally legislate for 300 million Americans.
The stakes are too high. Social conservatives must rise up as one and say no lesbian is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. Will they?
Oh, puhleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze...
Don’t forget that as dean of Harvard’s law school she banned military recruiters because she considered the “don’t ask, don’t tell policy” bigoted.
If she’s so opposed to “don’t ask don’t tell” she needs to prove it.
being homosexual is not shameful?
who wrote that?!
She does need to openly proclaim her status as a fornicator. After all, isn’t she “proud” of her fornication?
Is there really a question here? As a liberal, I would expect that it would have an impact on her judgment, but then again I would oppose all liberals to the Supreme Court, whether she was a lesbian or not.
Ha!
In this Senate, it will be a big plus.
The stakes are too high. Social conservatives must rise up as one and say no lesbian is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. Will they?
_______________________________________________
Of course they will. Trouble is, there are very few SoCons in DC.
I’m waiting for the RINO’s to join the dems and gush all over her and then confirm her without delay.
LSD is also illegal...
she forbid the military from recruiting at harvard law because of her personal view that homosexuals should be allowed to use the military as a dating service.
The supreme court struck down her ban 9 to zero.
where does she stand on homosexual based marriage?
homosexuals taking children?
Does a child have one mother and one father or just “two whatever”?
Obama would probably love to take credit for appointing the first openly homosexual member of the Supreme Court, and figure on her getting confirmed because the Republican senators would be afraid of being accused of bigotry...but his big theme for the 2010 elections is going to be “Republicans are racists” rather than “Republicans are anti-gay.”
She wants to get on the Supreme Court lickety-split.
She also needs to be told that, regardless of her sexual orientation, if confirmed, it’s the Constitution that she must consider. Not her sexual desires. This needs to be stated in the hearings and if she violates this, impeachment proceedings should take place and she needs to be told this in public.
She is a idiot. Don’t ask, don’t tell was to protect her gay friends in the military.
She certainly looks like a muff diver to me, but just as bad, she’s a part of zero’s gang of misfits.
I have no problem with a closeted gay. Sexual preferences should be a private matter. It’s the openly gay person who is an activist - and any activist on the Supreme Court is a danger to the Constitution.
Why should she care about the Constitution? For the last 75 years liberals haven’t. Ever since the Supreme Court had the temerity to declare some of the New Deal legislation unconstitutional, getting their agenda through has trumped everything else.
Some caller had the audacity to ask Suze Orman this question on her talk show, and she answered with amazing truthfulness and matter-of-factness. How come it’s good enough for talk radio but not for the nation’s highest court?
Fornication is biblical. Obama will say separation of church and state. Just as he used the Constitution this morning as if it was a document he cared about.
I am sure that attacking her on the Lesbian issue would be very productive.
Hey, 0bagger, what's "wrong" with being a Lesbian?
Have you checked with your Paki boyfriend or Sinclare lately?
What we have is separation of character & state.
I am sure that attacking her on the Lesbian issue would be very productive.
BAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaa ...
I like Kagen’s costume. Does Obama choose the uglies so they follow his rule? “Oh Obama, you are such a god to me.”
My theory. They were all bullied mercilessly for being liberal, ugly and weird. Now they get a political office and get their revenge. Think Gibbsy.
I don’t think it is right to ask her if she is a lesbian. Just ask here if she is heterosexual.
Frankly she is a distraction,while people speculate on her bedroom habits many things will go under the radar.
Its a double win for obama, a lesbian on the court and months of passing legislation, that no one pays attention too.
“Don’t forget that as dean of Harvard’s law school she banned military recruiters because she considered the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell policy’ bigoted.”
Senator Jeff Sessions made an important point on the news. Over 1000 soldiers died in combat overseas while Kagan was banning recruiters. Her anti-military, pro-homosexual agenda is despicable.
I can only answer that by "Look at what Brown did to California." Closeted gay to the public and because he demanded privacy his ultra liberal agenda was never revealed as governor. As AG now he refused to uphold the people's vote in court on Prop 8.
“LSD is also illegal...”
and ...? Sodomy is strictly prohibited by the UCMJ. It was also illegal in much of the USA until a few years ago. Hmmmm ... why is that?
The stupidity of the Obama administration never ceases to amaze me ... they should have realized that they have now made it an acceptable "issue", as it goes to the truthfulness of the WH and the nominee.
Although I respect others who feel differently, and while conceding that "character" is a fair criterion, I couldn't care less who she sleeps with ... I care about her intelligence, knowledge of the law, experience, and a willingness to grapple, in a reasoned way, with issues of huge national importance. She seems to be a knee-jerk liberal with no intellectual curiosity. Anywho who has written so little about the law does not have the passion for the law and for INTELLIGENT argument has no place on the Supreme Court.
Good point.
When I first saw her picture, I thought Obama nominated Chastity Bono to the Supreme Court.
Of course the White house flatly denies Kagen is gay.
Muslims behead, stone or kill gays. Obama will have to say he had no idea to muslim buddies.
"If she isn't a lesbian, it is a terrible waste of ugly."
“When I first saw her picture, I thought Obama nominated Chastity Bono to the Supreme Court.”
ROTFLMAO!
Obama has an ultra liberal agenda - which has been revealed - and still some don’t believe it of him. Brown’s agenda would have become apparent early on. The people of California must have wanted what Governor Moonbeam was selling.
Californians thought he was extension of his dad. He is only AG now because of big labor. His being gay is a conflict of interest right now and few know he is gay.
Well then, 0bagger will have to explain his sexual “status” before his buddies get really mad and demand a TSA equipment demonstration to see if he has the right package.
Isn't that Chazz Bono now?
Being gay is a conflict of interest? Then how can one explain Log Cabin Republicans?
Implying that because one is gay means s/he has a radical liberal agenda, seems a bit like the left’s attitude that African Americans must be Democrats or they cannot be black.
I told my husband she looked like a cross between Janet Napolitano and Chastity Bono.
ROTFLABO! This is absolutely hilarious!
No more than 5 Republicans will vote against her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.