>Kagan’s nomination, and likely approval, is a testament to all the NITWIT conservatives out there who found that Romney wasn’t perfect enough, or that McCain wasn’t perfect enough.
John “Amnesty” McCain? *snort*
>Well, because they weren’t perfect enough, we got Obama. And now for 40 years or so, we’ll have Kagan.
You’re assuming the system won’t collapse soon.
>Thank you, all you highly principled conservatives who thought that Romney wasn’t conservative enough. Or that McCain wasn’t conservative enough.
You’re welcome / If we keep settling for ‘good enough’ how long before ‘good enough’ isn’t?
>Is Obama conservative enough for you? How about Sotomayor? How about Kagan?
>
>Elections have consequences.
Sure they do... but you’re assuming that we have fair and/or honest elections; I’m willing to bet money that Iraq’s elections are both more fair and more honest.
Our Freepers our great but short-sighted sometimes. This will change our course forever.
Your “bumper sticker, sound bite” answers are all disjointed, with no central core of related reasonability. There’s no theme, other than hatred and ignorance.