Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elena Kagan and the Yale-Harvard Nexus (A preponderance of Yale-Harvard grads in elite positions)
American Thinker ^ | 05/11/2010 | Michael Filozof

Posted on 05/11/2010 9:06:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

On Monday, President Obama nominated Elena Kagan to succeed John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. Kagan's resume is incredibly thin. She was named dean of an Ivy League law school after only four years on its faculty. Kagan has never been a judge, and she had never argued a case in court prior to being named Solicitor General in 2009. But Kagan has one qualification that trumps nearly everything else: she's an alumna of Harvard, and formerly a faculty member there.

If it sometimes seems that the nation is governed by an elite liberal clique of college fraternity and sorority pals who are out of touch with average Americans, that's because it's largely true. Every president, and almost every presidential candidate for the last two decades has been a graduate of Harvard or Yale, and if Kagan gets confirmed by the Senate every member of the Supreme Court will have been a Yale or Harvard attendee, too.

The 1988 presidential election was a contest between Harvard law grad Michael Dukakis and Yalie George H.W. Bush. Yale Law grads Bill and Hillary Clinton came to power in 1992, beating Washburn alum Bob Dole.

The election of 2000 produced an interesting result: George W. Bush, a graduate of both Yale and Harvard (but according to his leftist critics the dumbest president ever) beat another Harvard grad, Al Gore, who is supposedly so brilliant he won a Nobel Prize. And in 2004 Bush beat fellow Yale grad John Kerry, whose grades at Yale were worse than Bush's grades.

The election of 2008 saw the ascension to the presidency of Harvard graduate Barack Obama, who beat Navy grad John McCain. According to his supporters like Michael Beschloss, David Brooks, and Colin Powell, Obama is "brilliant" and "transformational" - yet oddly, he never published anything as first black president of the Harvard Law Review, and unlike Bush, Kerry and McCain, his grades have never been released.

On the Supreme Court, Justices Alito, Sotomayor, and Thomas are Yale Law grads, while Scalia, Roberts, Breyer and Kennedy all went to Harvard Law. Justice Ginsberg graduated from Columbia Law, but she attended Harvard before transferring there. The odd man out is the retiring Justice Stevens, who got his law degree from Northwestern, soon to be replaced by Harvard's Kagan.

What shall we make of this preponderance of Yale-Harvard grads in elite positions of our society?

First, we ought to ask what kind of places Yale and Harvard are.

In recent years, Yale has instituted an annual "Sex Week at Yale," in which the university invites porn stars and bondage and leather fetishists to lecture (in various stages of nudity) students on various sexual techniques and the use of assorted sex toys.

Harvard is home to "scholars" like Charles Ogletree, who advocates reparations for slavery, and "Skip" Gates, who caused a race-baiting stir last year after an incident with a white cop in which President Obama took Gates's side without "knowing all the facts." Prior to coming to Harvard, Gates testified on behalf of the1980s rap act 2 Live Crew in an obscenity trial over lyrics about "bustin' vaginas" and other assorted perversions. Radical black professor Cornel West used to teach at Harvard; when former Harvard president Larry Summers criticized him for passing off a rap CD as academic work, West left in a snit for Princeton. Summers himself was later forced out after offending campus feminists. And Kagan was a chief proponent of banning military recruiters from Harvard over the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward gays.

Second, it is evident that for all the blather we hear about "diversity" from politicians and academics, the reality is that there's almost no diversity among our political elites. Somehow graduates of Howard and Grambling never make it onto the list of possible nominees when a vacancy appears on the Supreme Court, do they???

It seems there are never any graduates of West Point, Southern Methodist University, the University of Texas, UVA, or Brigham Young considered for any of the top slots in the judiciary or for the presidency. Engineers, businessmen and military officers are notably absent from the candidate pool dominated by lawyers, career politicians and political activists. If Kagan's nomination is approved, only one member of the Supreme Court - Justice Alito - will have had any military experience. Obama (who spent much of his early life stoned on drugs) has no military experience, either.

Protestants, who comprise the majority of the American population, will be entirely shut out of the Supreme Court when Stevens retires. Catholics will constitute two-thirds of the Court while Jews, who comprise 2% of the population, will hold 33% of the seats on the Court.

If we contrast the educational backgrounds of the Yale-Harvard clique with some of the leaders of the conservative movement of the 1980s and 1990s, the differences are astonishing. Ronald Reagan went to Eureka College, Speaker Newt Gingrich obtained a Ph.D. in history from Tulane, and congressional leaders Phil Gramm and Dick Armey obtained doctorates in economics from the University of Georgia and the University of Oklahoma, respectively. During their tenure in office we had sane fiscal, defense, immigration and tax policies. The same cannot be said today.

If diversity is a positive good, it is the diversity of education, opinion and experience in an atmosphere of open debate, not the faux diversity of skin color and gender. True diversity has clearly been sacrificed among the most powerful members of our society, who have increasingly spent their formative years being educated in a left-of mainstream Yale-Harvard bubble.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elenakagan; harvard; highereducation; ivyleague; yale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
If Elena Kagan gets confirmed, this Supreme Court will have ZERO Protestants. I believe this will be the first time in US history.

This inspite of the fact that America is stil a predominantly protestant/evangelical Christian country.

Also, it will be interesting to note that 4 of the justices will be from the City of New York.

Ruth Ginsberg from Brooklyn Antonin Scalia from Queens Sonya Sotomayor from the Bronx and Elena Kagan from Manhattan

Samuel Alito grew up not far from New York --- Trenton, NJ

1 posted on 05/11/2010 9:06:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She’s a political hack.


2 posted on 05/11/2010 9:08:09 AM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

interesting. but it will have a practicing lesbian.


3 posted on 05/11/2010 9:08:49 AM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

RE: interesting. but it will have a practicing lesbian.

I keep hearing people say that, but I can’t find a reliable source for this factoid.


4 posted on 05/11/2010 9:11:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I do believe that Crimson/Yalies in both parties have done an incredible job of screwing up the country and their campuses have become nests of communist/socialist thought. Every major incorrect policy seems to come to us from a Crimson or a Yalie. Were I president, I would disqualify from my cabinet anyone with a Harvard or Yale background.

Every mess this country is in, the error of thought can be traced back to these “elite” halls of “knowledge”.


5 posted on 05/11/2010 9:12:44 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I know I sound like a broken record, but at the end of the nineteenth century Harvard and Yale’s political orientation were the exact opposite of what they are today; Harvard and Yale were terrified of the radical socialist William Jennings Bryan.


6 posted on 05/11/2010 9:15:33 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (LeShim`on, Shelumi'el Ben Tzurishadday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
Were I president, I would disqualify from my cabinet anyone with a Harvard or Yale background.

C'mon, let's not go to that extreme. For every Ruth Ginsberg, we also have a Clarence Thomas (YALE), John Roberts (HARVARD), Samuel Alito (YALE) and Antonin Scalia (HARVARD).
7 posted on 05/11/2010 9:16:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

An article in the early eighties in the Atlantic Monthly detailed the same axis involved in the staffing of all congressional offices in the House and Senate. Conservative, mid-west legislators were burdened by socialist staffers from that axis, and had no supporting staff from the midwest. The gradual shift of the Republican party to the left (both parties are to the left of center) was influenced by the staffing practices of past decades.

Socialist staffing of Congress and the Senate paralleled the socialization of the professorial staffs of US univerisites and K1-12 as well.


8 posted on 05/11/2010 9:16:32 AM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan eet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

This same type of system worked so well for the Brits... NOT! Coming to a country near you.


9 posted on 05/11/2010 9:16:49 AM PDT by dumpthelibs (dumpthelibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
RE: Every mess this country is in, the error of thought can be traced back to these “elite” halls of “knowledge

Paul Johnson, eminent British Historian and author of the best seller,Modern Times and a seminal book on the elite entitled : INTELLECTUALS, has had something to say about intellectuals:

''One of the lessons of our century is: Beware the intellectuals,'' he has written. ''Not merely should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they also should be objects of peculiar suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice. Beware committees, conferences, leagues of intellectuals! For intellectuals, far from being highly individualistic and non-conformist people, are in fact ultraconformist within the circles formed by those whose approval they seek and value."
10 posted on 05/11/2010 9:21:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“If diversity is a positive good, it is the diversity of education, opinion and experience in an atmosphere of open debate, not the faux diversity of skin color and gender. True diversity has clearly been sacrificed among the most powerful members of our society, who have increasingly spent their formative years being educated in a left-of mainstream Yale-Harvard bubble.”

I absolutely agree with this. Having spent a considerable amount of time in an Ivy I can confidently say that there is absolutely no legitimate reason to cede control of the government to people with ‘designer label’ university backgrounds. You don't have to be a genius to be at Yale or Harvard or Penn etc.

Frankly, it's just as likely that you'll find very bright people at a state school since they are cheaper and many very bright people don't want or can't afford to spend tons of money on their education. Also, the admissions policies at places like Yale and Harvard tend to favor people like Obama, with atypical backgrounds, and this can count more than the absolute objective measures of your academic achievement.

In short, it's a very, very big mistake to oversample from specific backgrounds when choosing elected or appointed government officials. The mess that we're in is indicative of that.

11 posted on 05/11/2010 9:23:44 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yale-Harvard-and the most important third party in the triumvirate: Goldman Sachs


12 posted on 05/11/2010 9:25:12 AM PDT by eleni121 (For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
it will have a practicing lesbian.

Surely she must be an expert lesbian by now.

13 posted on 05/11/2010 9:27:34 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But the problem is that there is not much in the way of diverse thought or experience.


14 posted on 05/11/2010 9:27:43 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I saw a pic on tv this morning of her with a man and children. Does she have a family?


15 posted on 05/11/2010 9:29:38 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“For intellectuals, far from being highly individualistic and non-conformist people, are in fact ultraconformist within the circles formed by those whose approval they seek and value.”

Absolutely correct. If you can predict someones views and behaviors based on where they work and/or what they do, then there is very likely an element of conformity involved.

16 posted on 05/11/2010 9:30:14 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
I saw a pic on tv this morning of her with a man and children. Does she have a family?

Good question. Wikipedia states that she has NEVER MARRIED.
17 posted on 05/11/2010 9:33:06 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Surely she must be an expert lesbian by now.

Folks, I keep hearing this repeated over and over again. Where is the reliable source for this other than the fact that she opposed ROTC in Harvard because of the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy ?
18 posted on 05/11/2010 9:34:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
You don't have to be a genius to be at Yale or Harvard or Penn etc.

But you do need to have good grades. In fact, your SAT scores have to be AT LEAST above the 95% percentile to get into these schools. That at least, tells us something about the IQ of those getting into these colleges.

Of course Intelligence is often equated with Wisdom and THAT is the problem. We have too many foolish intellectuals out there.
19 posted on 05/11/2010 9:37:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

RE: Goldman Sachs

And they RECRUIT HEAVILY FROM YALE-HARVARD. You are more likely to get into Goldman with a Yale-Harvard degree than from any other school.


20 posted on 05/11/2010 9:39:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While all SCOTUS Justices attended Harvard or Yale, Thomas and Scalia did their undergraduate and much more formative years at Holy Cross and Georgetown respectively.Neither school when these justices attended, was considered an elite school. They were attended mostly by first college generation Catholic men. One thing both had in common was that their education was organized under the framework of the Jesuit Ratio Studiorum. A rigorous structure which required an answer to the question “Why” to defend every student response and opinion. While this method has eroded a bit through the years, when these two Justices attended their undergraduate schools the Ratio Studiorum was alive and well.


21 posted on 05/11/2010 9:41:49 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Never compromise with evil! Even in the face of Armageddon!! Rorshach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yale has instituted an annual “Sex Week at Yale,” should read instituted anal sex week at Yale. This is the new norm the left is pushing.

In Canada people are rebelling:

“It is unconscionable to teach eight-year-old children same-sex marriage, sexual orientation and gender identity,” said Charles McVety, head of the Canada Christian College. “It is even more absurd to subject sixth graders to instruction on the pleasures of masturbation, vaginal lubrication, and 12-year-olds to lessons on oral sex and anal intercourse.”

But it’s all coming from the universities which will try to influence government.


22 posted on 05/11/2010 9:41:49 AM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This inspite of the fact that America is stil a predominantly protestant/evangelical Christian country.

Last I checked, Evangelical Christians were about 20-25% of the population.

As far as folks in elite positions generally coming from the Ivys or the Chicago/Northwesterns/Stamfords, etc., hasn't this been the case for a century and a half? Admission is greatly tied to SAT scores, so the "cognitive elite" tend to attend such institutions.

23 posted on 05/11/2010 9:42:56 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Since it does impact how she may rule on gay and lesbian issues, I wonder what the exact wording should be to ask her I can think of some fun ones that are repeatable on this site, however there has to be a diplomatic and legal way to pull that question off as it is important to cases that could present before the court in the future.


24 posted on 05/11/2010 9:47:03 AM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

lol. Yes. But practicing all the same. :-).


25 posted on 05/11/2010 9:47:55 AM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

My God she is unattractive. Makes Sodameyer look like a beauty queen.


26 posted on 05/11/2010 9:49:02 AM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m a Harvard alum, but from one of the professional departments (i.e., not the ones infested with radicalism).

I’m a social conservative, Lutheran covert to Orthodox Christianity, pro-Serb, pro-Arizona, pro-American, totally anti-obama. Go figure!!!!


27 posted on 05/11/2010 9:51:26 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrat administrations are stocked with Ivy Leagers. Always have been.


28 posted on 05/11/2010 9:52:46 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Leagers = leaguers


29 posted on 05/11/2010 9:55:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The circle is not complete.

By extension most “elected” politicians are their enablers. They make policy not in the citizens’ best interests but in their own mega corporate and secular self interest.

Scary.


30 posted on 05/11/2010 9:59:32 AM PDT by eleni121 (For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe it was her brother or someone. LOL - you know - just for looks.


31 posted on 05/11/2010 10:02:52 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Where is the reliable source for this (her being a lesbian)

Did you hear about her nomination on the radio, or see it on TV? I'm guessing you must have HEARD it because SEEING is believing!! . She's 50 and doesnt have a man/family....the top two searches under her name are "husband" and "marriage" ....A LOT of people are asking the same question...

32 posted on 05/11/2010 10:04:19 AM PDT by BallparkBoys (Republicans spend $100,000 getting women into clothes while Democrats spend $100,000 getting women o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BallparkBoys
....the top two searches under her name are "husband" and "marriage"

Useless to search under those headings as we know that SHE HAS NEVER MARRIED. What we'd like to know is --- DOES SHE HAVE A "partner", and if she has, is the partner female.

I can't find it anywhere.
33 posted on 05/11/2010 10:06:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

One of the great ironies of this administration is that it hires from PRIVATE universities while they insist that government is the solution to all of our problems. If the government is the answer to all of our problems, why do they keep going to the PRIVATE university system. What is wrong with the great government university system that we all pay for?????????


35 posted on 05/11/2010 10:21:06 AM PDT by madinmadtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Believe me, Bryan would not be welcome at either place.

He spoke for folks outside the northeast who didn’t have a lot of money.

They don’t let more than a token number of people like that into those places. No one there wants to associate with the little people like that.

Besides, Bryan didn’t like the money houses. Lots of Harvard and Yale types make their money on Wall Street or in Hedge Funds located in Connecticut.

Nope, Bryan would not be welcome.


36 posted on 05/11/2010 10:22:14 AM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Look to see if she wears a thumb ring!


37 posted on 05/11/2010 10:26:44 AM PDT by cameraeye (A happy kufir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This total domination by the two elitist Ivy League schools on the Supreme Court is unprecedented in American history. There isn't even representation of the other Ivies, for crying out loud!

Incredible that of the hundreds of law schools in the entire country, only two will have alumni on the SCOTUS!!!

Traditionally, there had been some geographical diversity on the SCOTUS because it made good political and practical sense: not all the legal wisdom of the country comes from a single region. Apparently, today's left elitists don't give a hoot about anyone who doesn't have Ivy league credentials.

Well, at least the Ivy League still can't play football very well - at least for the last 60 years!!!

38 posted on 05/11/2010 10:58:29 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Your SAT scores do not need to be above the 95th percentile to get into these universities. If you are Caucasian and come from a middle class family with no family legacy connection and no ‘unique’ attributes (e.g. llived in some other country for a significant period of time) you will have to have those scores. If, however, you meet other criteria for what these schools are looking for you don't have to have those scores.

In fact, graduates from the Ivies often do not perform as well on standardized tests as do students from lesser name universities. Somehow I don't believe Al Gore's SAT scores were above the 95th percentile.

Incidentally, if you heard any of Obama’s recent graduation address you heard him say ...”rather than the means of e-pants-ipation” (he was supposed to say ‘emancipation’). So much for assuming that an education at an Ivy makes you one of the smartest people in the world.

39 posted on 05/11/2010 11:04:08 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

According to the article, Obama never published anything as first black president of the Harvard Law Review, and unlike Bush, Kerry and McCain, his grades have never been released.

Yet, the mainstream media never actually even TRIED to investigate these.


40 posted on 05/11/2010 11:07:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

From what we’ve seen coming out of Yale and Harvard they appear to be greatly over-rated schools.


41 posted on 05/11/2010 11:07:36 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Liberal machine runs on theory, and it dreams of bending reality to fit it.


42 posted on 05/11/2010 11:08:43 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

Speaking of Socialist staffing, this article gives us a glimpse into Elena Kagan’s personal ideology...

http://www.conservativeblogwatch.com/2010/05/10/young-kagans-thesis-on-socialism-by-daniel-foster/


The Daily Princetonian has an illuminating article on the young Elena Kagan, Class of ‘81. Under the tutelage of Sean Wilentz — lefty historian, friend of the Clintons, and notorious Bush-basher — Kagan wrote a thesis called “To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933,” which first raised eyebrows when Kagan was being considered for Souter’s seat last year:

“Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness,” she wrote in her thesis. “Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation.”

She called the story of the socialist movement’s demise “a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America … In unity lies their only hope.”

Much of the rest of the article is concerned with friends and colleagues from Kagan’s Princeton days defending her politics as ”mainstream,” e.g.

“I don’t remember her participating in marching, protesting, things like that,” [one colleague] said. “I would probably describe her back then — her politics — as progressive and thoughtful but well within the mainstream of the … sort of liberal, democratic, progressive tradition, and everything with lower case.”

But there is another revealing glimpse, via an opinion piece Kagan wrote in the wake of the 1980 elections. Kagan avows herself a liberal, and expresses her wish that the future bring “American disillusionment with conservative programs” and a “more leftist left.”

“I absorbed … liberal principles early,” she said. “More to the point, I have retained them fairly intact to this day.”

In the piece, Kagan also expressed her dissatisfaction with the state of the political left at the time, lamenting the demise of “real Democrats — not the closet Republicans that one sees so often these days” and the success of “anonymous but Moral Majority-backed … avengers of ‘innocent life’ and the B-1 Bomber, these beneficiaries of a general turn to the right and a profound disorganization on the left.”

She hoped that the future would “be marked by American disillusionment with conservative programs and solutions, and that a new, revitalized, perhaps more leftist left will once again come to the fore.


43 posted on 05/11/2010 11:10:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“’’Not merely should they be kept well away from the levers of power”

Actually, they have been, but they shout orders to the lever-pullers and they obey them because they think intellectuals know something.


44 posted on 05/11/2010 11:11:36 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

The story is that LBJ appointed Ramsey Clark as Attorney General in order to get Clark’s father to retire from the Supreme Court. Maybe “Patches” Kennedy’s retirement from the House of Representatives was designed to make it easier for his twin sister Elena Kagan to be confirmed for the Supreme Court.


45 posted on 05/11/2010 11:14:07 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
Believe me, Bryan would not be welcome at either place.

He spoke for folks outside the northeast who didn’t have a lot of money.

They don’t let more than a token number of people like that into those places. No one there wants to associate with the little people like that.

Besides, Bryan didn’t like the money houses. Lots of Harvard and Yale types make their money on Wall Street or in Hedge Funds located in Connecticut.

Nope, Bryan would not be welcome.

You're completely missing my point. I am aware that Bryan would not be welcome but today Bryan would be a conservative and the Ivy League moneyed types are radicals. Back when he was alive the moneyed Ivy Leaguers were actually conservative and considered Bryan a dangerous socialist revolutionary.

Somewhere along the line the Coastal Elites and the Heartland literally traded ideologies.

46 posted on 05/11/2010 11:34:43 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (LeShim`on, Shelumi'el Ben Tzurishadday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle; ExTexasRedhead; ml/nj; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; jazusamo; ...
"rather than the means of e-pants-ipation"

Now that was a whopper of a gaffe!!! Mark Levin broadcast the tape repeatedly on his show last night. He defined "e-pants-ipation" as removal of one's pants!

But I'd be surprised to see anyone on an MSM comedy show bring it up at all.

47 posted on 05/11/2010 11:35:42 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

If it had been Bush who made that gaffe the snickering by the MSM would be incessant.


48 posted on 05/11/2010 11:50:31 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping!


49 posted on 05/11/2010 11:51:00 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"I keep hearing people say that, but I can’t find a reliable source for this factoid."



You're right. There is NO evidence Kagan is a raging bull dyke. None at all.
50 posted on 05/11/2010 12:18:56 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson