Posted on 05/11/2010 5:43:22 PM PDT by RobinMasters
SS# were not issued in 1890...the SS# in question was issued to a man that was BORN in 1890, now obviously deceased...When the social security admin was created, numbers were issued to all citizens—obviously some were older at that time.
Nowadays everyone gets their number at birth.
I cannot get ANY link about O’s SSN at WND to work. Very suspicious.
Son of a gun if you're not spot on (this time), HG.
I checked four pages of RM's posting history, and found only one, one sentence reply. That's pretty terrible form for someone who posts so many threads.
Hey Robin. Love the threads you start, but if you continue to refuse to participate, you're going to draw excessive heat from the members.
Because it makes is so much easier to throw him under the bus when they're finished with him. He's the one who's being stupid. Sure, it's a great ride now but he hasn't thought about the end of the line.
That “debunking” site is just more smokescreen...the murky maze Obama operatives put out to ensure nothing is clear as they protect the man and his many, many, many “issues”.
The article was there 1/2 hr ago, now gone.
Persons in the witness protection program are reissued a SSN, but not one that belonged to someone else previously.
Debunked? No, your link says nothing and presumes a lot.
An 0bama supporting website. Might as well use Factcheck for reference.
We have not had a free and fair media/press for at least 18 years.
It worked at first, (you’re right, not working now and PLUS I could not find it by going straight to wnd.com site either! It was there just 25 minutes ago)
Fortunately I went there first and copied the full text, I’ll paste it here:
Obama’s Social Security number fraudulent?
Licensed investigators ask why it was issued to Connecticut applicant
Posted: May 12, 2010
1:00 am Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Two private investigators working independently are asking why
President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for
applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a
mailing address in the state.
In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977
and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a
Baskin & Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential
eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of
Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and
Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a
Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was
issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID
are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
“Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central
office,” the Social Security website explains. “The first three (3)
digits of a person’s social security number are determined by the ZIP
code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social
security number.”
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president’s
history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along
with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released
educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical
records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate,
Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and
adoption papers.
Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a
nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social
Security number should be questioned.
“I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states
where they don’t live, but there’s usually a good reason the person
applied for a Social Security number in a different state,” Siciliano
told WND.
WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White
House should answer.
“Yes,” he replied. “In the case of President Obama, I really don’t
know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security
number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of
Hawaii.”
Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable
television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel.
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is
using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question
links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective
Service System.
To verify that the number was issued by the Social Security
Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social
Security number verification database. She found that the numbers
immediately before and immediately after Obama’s were issued to
Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” Daniels
maintained. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in
Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a
mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person
who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear
to explain the anomaly.”
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
“Never,” Daniels said. “It’s against the law for a person to have a
re-issued or second Social Security number issued.”
Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that
Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.”
There is no indication in the limited background documentation
released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House
to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My
Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama
visited Connecticut during his high school years.
Sampson’s affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training
as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law
enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security
numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant
habitually resides and has their official residence.”
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security
number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security
number,” she told WND. “Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he
left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in
California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security
number in Hawaii.”
The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as
a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki
neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice cream shop still was
in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.
Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he
worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of
his current number.
“It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack
Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at
Baskin Robbins,” she insisted. “Under current law, a person is not
permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime.”
Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels
and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the
birth of the number holder, along with Obama’s birth date of
08/04/1962. A third date listed is 04/08/1962, which appears to be a
transposition of Obama’s birth date in an international format, with
the day before the month.
Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and
produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date
associated with the 042 Social Security number.
Daniels said she can’t be sure if the 1890 figure has any
significance. But she said it appears that the number Obama is using
was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.
After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a
licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first
occurrence of Obama’s association with the number was in 1986 in
Chicago.
Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously
issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death
of the original holder.
Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995.
Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and
Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law
enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by
attorney Orly Taitz in a eligibility case against Obama last year.
That site is an 0bama supporter site. Useless, like Factcheck.
Over the past year and a half of investigating on Freerepublic this information came out. Wish I could locate the thread. At the time I decided to check out active SSN to make sure that they were in fact telling the truth. It was active at the time.
I just tried finding where I did a check and boy have lots of things changed. Do you realize how many web sites that have popped up stating myth or debunked etc. Someone has been very busy covering up stuff!
Let me see if I can search Freerepublic for the thread this was on.
Yes, Bernadine was the one doing a lot of fake IDs at that time. There is also a lot of talk of the Dunhams doing the same for real estate and loan scams through grandma's and mama's banks. Birds of a feather, ya know.
I realized that right away little jeremiah.... It’s really nice to have familiar people around such as yourself to notice this stuff.
It is something like this that could cause Obama's house of cards to collapse.
WND is very bad for our side. How can they seriously come up with this crap?
oops, thanks for the clarification cycle!
WND is very bad for our side. How can they seriously come up with this crap?
what crap are you talking about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.