Skip to comments.Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
9:57 pm Eastern
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Corsi discussing this now on KHOW.
What is KNOW?
KEEP DIGGING... KEEP DIGGING.
There is so much crap surrounding this Creep-in-Chief.
DO NOT STOP !
“Your mission... should you choose to accept it”...
Boy, SS fraud would be a delicious way of catching him in a birth-origin lie, but, uh, ,,,
Social security numbers are issued at birth. The article says that system of issuing SS numbers was instituted in the 1970s. I’m younger than Obama (by a good deal), but my social security number doesn’t conform to the article’s formula at all.
Social security numbers are issued at birth - to those born in the United States. I have yet to find a record on a non-American baby born in Kenya receiving one.
Mine doesn’t match the formula either. Doesn’t mean Dear Leader’s SS isn’t fraudulent but does undermine the articles point. : (
Social Security numbers have not always been issued at birth. In the 70’s you didn’t get one until you were 16, or old enough to get your first job. That was when you got one. I got mine in 1974, when I was 16 and about to go to work. In the 70’s Obama would have done the same.
It was in the 80’s (as my children were born) that they were issued at birth.
Even then all 3 of my kids beginning 3 numbers matches the state ID.
Post #34 on this thread DOES appear accurate, and DOES jive with the story:
I think this might take you directly there:
Not so. Social Security numbers today might be issued when a child is a baby, when I was growing up you didn't need one for anything until you went to work, and it was quite common to not get them until you were in high school. I was issued one in the State I resided in when I applied, not the State of birth.
Obama wasn't issued one until his college years I bet. And yes, like everything else about him, his is a fraud.
This post explains what the poorly written article meant, and it seems accurate, after all:
All 6 members of my household match the formula.
Perhaps the formula was modified somewhere along the line.
You cut and pasted this exact posting in the other threads about this yesterday-—IDENTICAL.
Plus you’ve been active since, what, May 7, here at FR?
And you’ll all animated—telling us you have the single personal experience that falls outside these expert investigators due diligence.
You certainly are a busy little mole for your man...and with such flair.
Go back to your mommy’s basement Obot.
It is true that today SS numbers are issued at birth. However, when I was born in 1951, SS numbers were not issued at birth. One applied for it when seeking employment for the first time. So, 0bama’s SS number might not have been issued at his birth just like mine was not.
Same for me, but I still resided in the state where I was born. I was a teenager when I got mine. Maybe they’re issued at birth now, but that wasn’t the case 40 years ago.
Social Security numbers were not oringally issued at birth. You applied for one when when you entered the work force. I got mine at 13 due to a change in the tax law and dear old dad needed me to have one to claim me as a dependent.
The Kenyan's number is fraudalent because he's fraudalent. Why a Connecticut number I can't explain. A number from downstate New York or northern Virginia maybe if he was recruited by the Company while at Columbia. We'll have to wait for Rev. Manning to release his evidence.
They are issued at birth now - It has’t always been that way.
I don’t think mine was issued until I was 10 or 11.
Obama could have this for a SS number 666-66-6666 and the MSM would not question it.