Skip to comments.Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
9:57 pm Eastern
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
He worked at Baskin Robins when he was 15 in HI
Not the best job of investigating.
I posted on the more recent one, then I saw the note that the thread was a clone, so I posted on the older one. I’ve been posting and active since 2003, and the vanities I’ve posted alone have a total of several hundred thousand (maybe close to a million) views.
Also, before you could even finish your post, I had updated my original post with a further argument that supports the article. Be a little careful who you call an O-bot.
Don’t you—for a minute—think that experts, that do this for a living , and have reputations to conbsider, factored what you are saying into their conclusions before they allowed thier names to be associated with this report?
Maybe he had a part time 3 card monte gig in Hartford while he was allegedly at Columbia.
Well then perhaps you should consider shifting your profession to ID theft, having a greater grasp than experts working in the field for 30 years, eh?
SS numbers have not always been issued at birth. I remember applying for mine and receiving it when I was in 7th grade, about 1972. My friends and I all went to the post office at the same time to get the applications.
Yes, I was born in the US, I am 12th generation American, have a family history older than this country, back to the 17th century.
Except he used that number before he ever went to Columbia
They are not issued at birth.
All 5 members of my family match as well. In the 70’s Obama would have applied when he was able to go to work. There is no evidence anywhere that he ever worked in CT.
And it still doesn’t match previous reports during the past year of THIS CT number belonging to a man born in 1899. So, if that number is REALLY Obama’s he was born in 1899.
You could get one when you started a job and I got mine and my job in the 70’s even though I was born in 57.
But the first 3 digits of the Soc Sec number is accurate for the state of CT-where I live now.
I did not get a SS # until I registered for the Selective Service in 1974 at age 17. I had to register to go into the military. I wonder, did the Kenyan Village Idiot every register for Selective Service, it is the law now, was when I was a teenager, hmmmm?
In the 70’s S.S. numbers were issued when you sought employment for the first time. I know - I got mine in 1974 when I was 16 seeking my first job. Obama would have been the same.
The being issued at birth began after 1980. My first child was born then and when she was 6 months old I had to apply for her S.S. card. The other 2 born later were automatically issued as the birth certificate information was turned in.
That should help clarify this ‘issued at birth’ from younger posters.
No, see, this is where you write “Oops... I didn’t see that” and go away. It’s pretty ironic that you accuse me of being an O-bot who only signed up a couple of days ago, when you could have discovered the truth by simply clicking on “dangus,” but then you write what you just did.
They were only issued at birth beginning in the 1990’s.
I didn’t have a social security number until 1972. My son and I got them only because you had to have them for income tax deductions that year. My husband and I were in Alabama at the time, so we have Alabama social security numbers. This includes my son’s birth in Italy while hubby was stationed there with the Army. Never needed them to get passports either.
Which begs the question, when did he ever have a mailing address in CT? As far as we know, he didnt. However, it says this number started being used by him in 86 which is right after he moved to Chicago (85) and about the time the mail carrier says he met him at Tom Ayers house where Bernadine Dohrn was also living. Bernadine was into identity theft. That sounds to me like another puzzle piece clicked into place, huh.
Well, no... mine was issued at birth long before that; but in post #11 I linked to another thread that does explain how Obama’s SSN does belong to CT.
Social security numbers are issued at birth now, but I was born in Hawaii in ‘56. My sister was born in Michigan in ‘63 and we both didn’t have social security numbers until 1970 and we were living in California.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.