Skip to comments.Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
9:57 pm Eastern
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Corsi discussing this now on KHOW.
What is KNOW?
KEEP DIGGING... KEEP DIGGING.
There is so much crap surrounding this Creep-in-Chief.
DO NOT STOP !
“Your mission... should you choose to accept it”...
Boy, SS fraud would be a delicious way of catching him in a birth-origin lie, but, uh, ,,,
Social security numbers are issued at birth. The article says that system of issuing SS numbers was instituted in the 1970s. I’m younger than Obama (by a good deal), but my social security number doesn’t conform to the article’s formula at all.
Social security numbers are issued at birth - to those born in the United States. I have yet to find a record on a non-American baby born in Kenya receiving one.
Mine doesn’t match the formula either. Doesn’t mean Dear Leader’s SS isn’t fraudulent but does undermine the articles point. : (
Social Security numbers have not always been issued at birth. In the 70’s you didn’t get one until you were 16, or old enough to get your first job. That was when you got one. I got mine in 1974, when I was 16 and about to go to work. In the 70’s Obama would have done the same.
It was in the 80’s (as my children were born) that they were issued at birth.
Even then all 3 of my kids beginning 3 numbers matches the state ID.
Post #34 on this thread DOES appear accurate, and DOES jive with the story:
I think this might take you directly there:
Not so. Social Security numbers today might be issued when a child is a baby, when I was growing up you didn't need one for anything until you went to work, and it was quite common to not get them until you were in high school. I was issued one in the State I resided in when I applied, not the State of birth.
Obama wasn't issued one until his college years I bet. And yes, like everything else about him, his is a fraud.
This post explains what the poorly written article meant, and it seems accurate, after all:
All 6 members of my household match the formula.
Perhaps the formula was modified somewhere along the line.
You cut and pasted this exact posting in the other threads about this yesterday-—IDENTICAL.
Plus you’ve been active since, what, May 7, here at FR?
And you’ll all animated—telling us you have the single personal experience that falls outside these expert investigators due diligence.
You certainly are a busy little mole for your man...and with such flair.
Go back to your mommy’s basement Obot.
It is true that today SS numbers are issued at birth. However, when I was born in 1951, SS numbers were not issued at birth. One applied for it when seeking employment for the first time. So, 0bama’s SS number might not have been issued at his birth just like mine was not.
Same for me, but I still resided in the state where I was born. I was a teenager when I got mine. Maybe they’re issued at birth now, but that wasn’t the case 40 years ago.
Social Security numbers were not oringally issued at birth. You applied for one when when you entered the work force. I got mine at 13 due to a change in the tax law and dear old dad needed me to have one to claim me as a dependent.
The Kenyan's number is fraudalent because he's fraudalent. Why a Connecticut number I can't explain. A number from downstate New York or northern Virginia maybe if he was recruited by the Company while at Columbia. We'll have to wait for Rev. Manning to release his evidence.
They are issued at birth now - It has’t always been that way.
I don’t think mine was issued until I was 10 or 11.
Obama could have this for a SS number 666-66-6666 and the MSM would not question it.
He worked at Baskin Robins when he was 15 in HI
Not the best job of investigating.
I posted on the more recent one, then I saw the note that the thread was a clone, so I posted on the older one. I’ve been posting and active since 2003, and the vanities I’ve posted alone have a total of several hundred thousand (maybe close to a million) views.
Also, before you could even finish your post, I had updated my original post with a further argument that supports the article. Be a little careful who you call an O-bot.
Don’t you—for a minute—think that experts, that do this for a living , and have reputations to conbsider, factored what you are saying into their conclusions before they allowed thier names to be associated with this report?
Maybe he had a part time 3 card monte gig in Hartford while he was allegedly at Columbia.
Well then perhaps you should consider shifting your profession to ID theft, having a greater grasp than experts working in the field for 30 years, eh?
SS numbers have not always been issued at birth. I remember applying for mine and receiving it when I was in 7th grade, about 1972. My friends and I all went to the post office at the same time to get the applications.
Yes, I was born in the US, I am 12th generation American, have a family history older than this country, back to the 17th century.
Except he used that number before he ever went to Columbia
They are not issued at birth.
All 5 members of my family match as well. In the 70’s Obama would have applied when he was able to go to work. There is no evidence anywhere that he ever worked in CT.
And it still doesn’t match previous reports during the past year of THIS CT number belonging to a man born in 1899. So, if that number is REALLY Obama’s he was born in 1899.
You could get one when you started a job and I got mine and my job in the 70’s even though I was born in 57.
But the first 3 digits of the Soc Sec number is accurate for the state of CT-where I live now.
I did not get a SS # until I registered for the Selective Service in 1974 at age 17. I had to register to go into the military. I wonder, did the Kenyan Village Idiot every register for Selective Service, it is the law now, was when I was a teenager, hmmmm?
In the 70’s S.S. numbers were issued when you sought employment for the first time. I know - I got mine in 1974 when I was 16 seeking my first job. Obama would have been the same.
The being issued at birth began after 1980. My first child was born then and when she was 6 months old I had to apply for her S.S. card. The other 2 born later were automatically issued as the birth certificate information was turned in.
That should help clarify this ‘issued at birth’ from younger posters.
No, see, this is where you write “Oops... I didn’t see that” and go away. It’s pretty ironic that you accuse me of being an O-bot who only signed up a couple of days ago, when you could have discovered the truth by simply clicking on “dangus,” but then you write what you just did.
They were only issued at birth beginning in the 1990’s.
I didn’t have a social security number until 1972. My son and I got them only because you had to have them for income tax deductions that year. My husband and I were in Alabama at the time, so we have Alabama social security numbers. This includes my son’s birth in Italy while hubby was stationed there with the Army. Never needed them to get passports either.
Which begs the question, when did he ever have a mailing address in CT? As far as we know, he didnt. However, it says this number started being used by him in 86 which is right after he moved to Chicago (85) and about the time the mail carrier says he met him at Tom Ayers house where Bernadine Dohrn was also living. Bernadine was into identity theft. That sounds to me like another puzzle piece clicked into place, huh.
Well, no... mine was issued at birth long before that; but in post #11 I linked to another thread that does explain how Obama’s SSN does belong to CT.
Social security numbers are issued at birth now, but I was born in Hawaii in ‘56. My sister was born in Michigan in ‘63 and we both didn’t have social security numbers until 1970 and we were living in California.
Yep, especially since that CT number belonged to an individual born in 1899. Unless Obama’s carries his age well, its a fraudulent number.
Maybe he is an illegal alien.................
He actually used it in 1980 for Selective Service Registration ( if, of course, that record is the original one, and not one created in the past couple of years to cover his tracks )
So says He? I wonder if there even was Baskin Robins back then?
SS numbers were not issued at birth when he was hatched. We didn’t have to get SS numbers for babies until the late 80’s. I didn’t get a SS number until I was a teen in the early 70’s when I got my first real job..............
That’s not true.Social Security numbers were only issued when you applied for it yourself or your parents applied.
I know because I didn’t have one untill I turned seventeen and needed it to get a job.That was in the late 1960’s.
In Texas, my children born in the 1980’s did not have social security cards until I had to apply for them in order to list them as dependents on our taxes. In the 1990’s, our children born in Nebraska were issued social securtiy cards when their birth was registered by the state. I applied for mine in the seventies when I got my first job.
I wonder if you needed a SS number in the 60’s in order to get a passport ? If so, he must have used another one before this ( since it was issued in the 70’s ) in order to get a passport when he moved to Indonesia.
ss #’s have not always been issued at birth...i was born in (ahem) 1956 and ours was not issued until we were in jr high school....also the first 3 numbers on mine shows it was issued in the state of florida....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.