Posted on 05/12/2010 11:37:38 AM PDT by Shermy
The Senate just voted, 96-0, to audit the Federal Reserve. Soon, we will know what the Federal Reserve did with the trillions of dollars that it handed out during the financial crisis.
A few months ago, such a vote would have been unthinkable. One senior Treasury official claimed he would fight to stop an audit 'at all costs'. Senator Chris Dodd predicted that an audit would spell economic doom, while Senator Judd Gregg attacked accountability for the Fed as "pandering populism".
Today, both the Treasury Department and Senator Dodd support this amendment. As for Judd Gregg, he was just on the floor of the Senate discussing -- of all people -- 19th century populist Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan.
What happened?
People Power is what happened. We built a coalition of people on the right and the left, ordinary citizens and economists, ex-regulators and politicians, all with one question for which we demanded an answer: "What happened to our money?"
No longer can Ben Bernanke get away with saying, "I don't know."
Now, we're going to know who got what, and why.
Releasing this information will show that the Federal Reserve's arguments for secrecy are -- and have always been-- a ruse, to cover up the handing out of hundreds of billions of dollars like party favors to the Wall Street favorites who brought the American economy to the brink of ruin.
But our work isn't quite done. The Senate audit provision isn't as strong as what we passed in the House. The Senate provision has only a one-time audit, whereas what we passed in the House would allow audits going forward. There will be a conference committee that will merge the provisions from the two bills.
The need for audits and oversight over Fed handouts going forward is great. The financial crisis isn't over, and neither are the Fed's secret bailouts. Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve announced it was going underwrite the Greek bailout by lending dollars to the central banks of Europe, England, and Japan. The loans may never be paid back, the Fed accepts the risk that the dollar will strengthen in the meantime, and the interest rate charged by the Fed is very likely at below-market rates. So such loans are in effect just a subsidy, to bail out foreigners.
The Fed has not been chastened. It is bolder and more of a rogue actor than ever. It's clear that without full audit authority going forward, the Fed will continue to give out "foreign aid" without Congressional or even Executive permission.
And it will do so in secret.
So we will be fighting on to get a full audit from the conference committee.
But let's not lose sight of what we have accomplished so far - real independent inquiry into the Fed, and its incestuous relationships with Wall Street banks. For the first time ever.
Our calls, emails, lobbying, blogging, and support really mattered. We made it happen.
Today, we beat the Fed.
“Today, we beat the Fed.”
Good news, but not over yet. Obama could veto and the Dems will not override him if he gives a mushy excuse that appeals to liberal pundits and invokes their fear that they cannot say “liar” to him on anything.
The Fed will be beaten when it's finally abolished.
ALAN GRAYSON wrote this?
Ron Paul is no longer isolated! Now if the Senate would approve 98-0 to stop being the world’s only super policeman, recovery would begin..........................Bailing out the world is a never ending financial sinkhole.
YES!
WHO IS he?
Who’s doing the auditing?
Hurrah!
but, I to worry this audit may be _handled_ by the likes of Geithner and other ex-GS banker boys.
This guy who wrote this is a leftist loon.
Accountability, great. Openness, fine. ... but then what? What’s this leftists real agenda? It’s political control of money supply.
Handing monetary policy to the leftist loons in Congress is worse than the status quo. Political control of money supply is what destroyed many a 3rd world country.
And Andrew Jackson’s attacks on the National Bank was good ol fashioned populism ... but also the cause of the Great Depression of the 1830s.
Something to ponder before you drink the RonPaul EndtheFed koolaid.
Obama could veto”
Nope. The banking bill is a Govt takeover of the banking sector. It wont be vetoed it’s been WRITTEN by them.
THIS IS A POPULIST DISTRACTION FROM THE REAL BILL. The real bill is a huge ramp-up in govt control in the banking sector.
Obamacare, cap-and-tax, amnesty, union card check, and this banking regulations = Euro-Socialism.
“the real bill is a huge ramp-up in govt control in the banking sector.”
Banking is licensed fractional reserve lending. The Banks are licensed to invent United States money.
But if you counterfeit United States money in the form of currency, that is a crime.
Why should there not be government control of the money it licenses?
Uh, a loan is not a handout, assclown. Neither is the purchase of a bond.
Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve announced it was going underwrite the Greek bailout by lending dollars to the central banks of Europe, England, and Japan. The loans may never be paid back,
A swap is not like an unsecured loan, moron.
the Fed accepts the risk that the dollar will strengthen in the meantime
We don't care what the exchange rate will be, the dollars will get paid back, regardless of rate.
and the interest rate charged by the Fed is very likely at below-market rates.
There is no charge, on either side. It's a swap, idiot.
I'm gonna miss you when you're gone. Clown.
Loaning money isn't inventing money. Sorry.
“Loaning money isn’t inventing money. Sorry.”
Start with Wiki on fractional reserve banking:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking
Example,
“This both limits the amount of money creation that occurs in the commercial banking system”
Sorry.
You deposit $10 in the bank. The bank takes $9 of your deposit and lends it out. Nothing invented there.
Well, on the schedules and accountings and econ stats and econometrics, now $19 exists.
They treat it that way. Does it really exist? That’s where faith comes in. :)
And yet all the bank did was lend out less than your deposit. No inventing or counterfeiting involved.
Anyone on FR agreeing with this certified head case needs to stop and consider the source. Grayson is nuts. Conservatives should run fast and far from him.
Yet you posted this loon's drivel. Double face-palm time, dude.
In our Gangster Government, puppet president "Professor Ohaha" knows nothing about high finance.. COS Rahm Emanuel was a Wall Street predator----WHO PROCEEDED TO TAKE OVER THE US TREASURY, once he got into the WH.
===========================================
Behind The Real Size of the Wall Street Bailout (Mother Jones reports its $14 trillion)
Mother Jones | Dec. 21, 2009 / FR Posted January 04, 2010 by E. Pluribus Unum
A guide to the abbreviations, acronyms, and obscure programs that make up the $14 trillion federal bailout of Wall Street.
The price tag for the Wall Street bailout is often put at $700 billionthe size of the Troubled Assets Relief Program. But TARP is just the best known program in an array of more than 30 overseen by Treasury Department and Federal Reserve that have paid out or put aside money to bail out financial firms and inject money into the markets. To get a sense of the size of the real $14 trillion bailout, see our chart here. Below, a guide to the pieces of the puzzle:
Treasury Department bailout programs (controlled by Rahm Emanuel)
Money Market Mutual Fund: In September 2008, the Treasury announced that it would insure the holdings of publicly offered money market mutual funds. According to the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), these guarantees could have potentially cost the federal government more than $3 trillion [PDF].
Public-Private Investment Fund: This joint Treasury-Federal Reserve program bought toxic assets from banks and brokeragesas much as $5 billion of assets per firm. According to SIGTARP, the government's potential exposure from the PPIF is between $500 million and $1 trillion [PDF].
TARP: As part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the Treasury has made loans to or investments more than 750 banks and financial institutions. $650 billion has been paid out (not including HAMP; see below). As of December 21, 2009, $117.5 billion of that has been repaid. Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) stock purchase: The Treasury has bought $200 million in preferred stock from Fannie Mae and another $200 million from Freddie Mac [PDF] to show that they "will remain viable entities critical to the functioning of the housing and mortgage markets." GSE mortgage-backed securities purchase: Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the Treasury may buy mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. According to SIGTARP, these purchases could cost as much as $314 billion [PDF].
--SNIP--- long read
Federal Reserve bailout programs
Commercial Paper Funding Facility: With the support from the Treasury, the Fed established the CPFF in October 2008 to increase the availability of short-term debt (commercial paper) funding. Up to $1.8 trillion [PDF] was earmarked for the program.
Mortgage-backed securities purchase: In 2009, the Fed earmarked up to $1.25 trillion to buy investments based on home loans.
Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility: TALF provides financing to investors who are buying asset-backed securities. In February 2009, the Fed and Treasury announced an expansion of the program to generate up to $1 trillion in new lending.
Foreign Central Bank Currency Liquidity Swaps: The Fed has provided $755 billion [PDF] for currency liquidity swaps with foreign central banks.
--SNIP--- long read
=============================================
HOW DID GANGSTER GOVERNMENT MOVE $14 TRILLION BAILOUT MONEY? ONE EXAMPLE OF THE MODUS OPERANDI: While acting the succesful investor, philanthropist, and Wall Street advisor, Ponzi thief Madoff created a labyrinth of interrelated international funds, institutions and financial entities of almost unparalleled complexity and breadth...... with assets and businesses in 11 places overseas that hid his rhievery. The wealthiest Madoffians were businessmen who were funneling income to Madoff to avoid US taxes and banking laws, and acting publicly like do gooder "philanthropists". But they were all tax cheats and money launderers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.