Skip to comments.
Gregoire Could Replace Kagan
National Journal ^
| 12 May 2010
| Reid Wilson
Posted on 05/12/2010 1:02:21 PM PDT by Publius
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
05/12/2010 1:02:22 PM PDT
by
Publius
To: Publius
They need to hold on to their short list for SCOTUS too.
2
posted on
05/12/2010 1:03:29 PM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: sionnsar
3
posted on
05/12/2010 1:03:44 PM PDT
by
Publius
(Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
To: Publius
WA state would be glad to get rid of Gregoire. One less lying lib can only improve the state.
4
posted on
05/12/2010 1:04:38 PM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(First we take down the Democrats, then we clean the Augean stable that is the GOP.)
To: Publius
“Gregoire Could Replace Kagan”
Well that is good and bad.
5
posted on
05/12/2010 1:04:39 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Over YOUR dead body!)
To: Publius
WA Gov. Christine Gregoire (D) leads a short list to replace Solicitor General Elena Kagan, the WH has told members of Gregoire's home-state delegation. I don't get it.
Has Kagan been confirmed already?
Has she resigned as S.G. ?
Or is this just more arrogance?
Never mind; I think I know.
6
posted on
05/12/2010 1:05:50 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Publius
Oh god, not that brain-dead twit.
7
posted on
05/12/2010 1:07:34 PM PDT
by
Hexenhammer
(sic semper tyrannis)
To: Publius
Good. Get rid of the incompetent hag out of my state.
8
posted on
05/12/2010 1:07:39 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Publius
Take our Governor...please.
To: Publius
Another lying cheating piece of garbage.
10
posted on
05/12/2010 1:09:27 PM PDT
by
Carley
(WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
To: Grunthor
Bad and worse.....Gregoire on the Supreme Court for life?...God help us!!
To: Publius
I read the headline and thought Kagan was in trouble for the SC nomination and there was already speculation on a replacement! LOL.
12
posted on
05/12/2010 1:10:42 PM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Arrogant Obama on tax day protesters: "YouÂ’d think they would be saying 'Thank You!'.")
To: Publius
Obama has reportedly told top aides he wants to be the first president to appoint 3 women to the high court. Why? Why wouldn't you want the best available jurist, regardless of sex or skin color? Just a rhetorical question.
To: AngelesCrestHighway
NO...as Solicitor General...
14
posted on
05/12/2010 1:12:24 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Destroy AMERICA.....Vote DEMOCRAT)
To: Pearls Before Swine
OH, c’mon...YOU KNOW WHY....
15
posted on
05/12/2010 1:13:00 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Destroy AMERICA.....Vote DEMOCRAT)
To: Publius
E.T. phone home...
To: Publius
I heard that Windsy Gwam wants to vote for Kagan!
17
posted on
05/12/2010 1:13:49 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: Publius
That pile of crap got in to office after the third recount of votes. ACORN and friends kept “finding” votes each recount which eventually ended up with her beating Dino Rossi in a very close race. No way should this fraud be on the Supreme Court!!....Sweet Jesus!
To: Publius
Meet the new moonbat, same as the old moonbat.
19
posted on
05/12/2010 1:14:50 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Solicitor General, not the Supreme Court.
20
posted on
05/12/2010 1:14:54 PM PDT
by
Publius
(Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
