Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Furlough = NO-GO ... UPDATED x 2 »
New York Daily News ^ | 5/12/10 | Ken Lovett

Posted on 05/12/2010 4:42:16 PM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: SmithL

So how does this work with a “Separate but equal” doctrine? I don’t recall any constitutional provisions that allow the judicial branch to direct the executive branch to do anything. All they can do is rule that something is illegal/unconstitutional....they can not dictate a remedy.


21 posted on 05/13/2010 5:59:09 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"The unions and many lawmakers argued the furloughs were illegal because they were not collectively bargained."

As 0bammy has effectively said to auto co bond holders, etc., etc.:"Contracts? I don't pay no attention to no stinkin' contracts".

22 posted on 05/13/2010 7:36:00 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Social Justice for Taxpayers or for SEIU gov’t workers?


23 posted on 05/13/2010 7:41:12 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson