Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2010 6:47:05 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

I keep reading stuff like this about her book, I think I will pass on buying this one and reading it.


2 posted on 05/12/2010 6:48:37 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Its time for the media to divide the GOP again


3 posted on 05/12/2010 6:52:00 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I’m beyond surprise anymore. I think I will just continue to ride the spiral out.


4 posted on 05/12/2010 6:53:55 PM PDT by 3boysdad (It's time to get busy living or get busy dying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Very discouraging.


6 posted on 05/12/2010 6:54:19 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Sounds like she's gone Unitarian/Universalist on us...if she was ever anything else.
7 posted on 05/12/2010 6:54:49 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What a waste of potential.


8 posted on 05/12/2010 6:55:39 PM PDT by muddler (Obama is either incompetent or malicious, and it makes little difference which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Wasn't Nancy Reagan for abortion? I don't know about her view on gay rights.

Doesn't really matter, we voted for Ronald and W

10 posted on 05/12/2010 6:56:56 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I guess she needed something controversial to sell her book. How sad!


11 posted on 05/12/2010 6:59:23 PM PDT by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I hate to say this, but it makes me doubt whether Bush was really pro-life. (Don’t forget, he wanted bra-burning leftist Harriet Miers on the USSC.)

Seriously, it’s such a deep, moral issue. Why do all these RINOs (GW Bush, GHW Bush, McCain, Dole) have pro-abortion wives? (Ms. Dole claimed to be a prolifer, but she now co-chairs with Christine Todd Whitman a PAC to purge pro-lifers out of the Republican Party, the insanely revealingly titled, “It’s MY Party [so just give us your money and votes get the hell out? -D] PAC”.) OK, an exception I could see — couples don’t always agree on even the most personal, moral issues — but they’re unanimously pro-abortion!


13 posted on 05/12/2010 7:01:19 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Barbara Bush was pro-abortion, too. Very unfortunate, because I like both of those ladies. But they seem to have blind spots on some of these basic moral issues.

I think that Harriet Miers was a feminist and was quietly pro-abortion, in spite of all the efforts to paint her as an “Evangelical.” And it was Laura more than anyone who backed that supremely lousy choice for the Supreme Court.


14 posted on 05/12/2010 7:02:05 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The Bart Stupak First Lady.


15 posted on 05/12/2010 7:02:47 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY; NFHale; genetic homophobe; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; ...
I also found this recent youtube clip of her on Larry King selling her book : youtube : Laura Bush For Gay Marriage & Pro-Choice!

You folks all read her moving book yet ? :)

17 posted on 05/12/2010 7:05:14 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Just noticed this post too.


19 posted on 05/12/2010 7:10:09 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

No more RINOS! Gays and abortionists have all the legal provisions you could ask for.

They wish to usurp religion.


20 posted on 05/12/2010 7:11:15 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1 Halfbaked: 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Why did she feel the need to say anything at all? I’ve always admired Laura Bush and felt she carried herself with such class and dignity. But then she feels it necessary to essentially flip off people that believe in only the traditional marriage and who hold life as sacred. It’s disgusting really and shows, imo, just how mentally unbalanced people have become.


21 posted on 05/12/2010 7:12:19 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Funny how other past presidents are called former Presidents, but abc calls Bush, ex-president.


22 posted on 05/12/2010 7:12:49 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I'm not that surprised. George W Bush on several occasions hinted that he probably would not have gotten Laura's vote if he wasn't married to her.

I don't think George is all that conservative either.

23 posted on 05/12/2010 7:13:57 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (I don't look for leaders. I follow my own path, my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
You know. . .I don't always have to agree with people in order to appreciate 'who' they are. Though, for sure; the more in common, the better. . .

I love Laura Bush; but Laura never ran for Office and I never voted for 'her'; so her opinions, I can take and/or reject. It does not change my opinion of her as First Lady; where her private - and 'very private' opinings did not impact our larger 'body politic'.

I did however, vote for her husband - both times - and his Father for that matter; and while there is a 'for better' and 'for worse', the better of GW, saved our Country from a worse fate on the world stage - such as the fate - so damning - now being cast by our current President.

I do not agree with Laura's opinion here; and true to her 'grace' a First Lady - again, unlike current Fist Lady - we were NEVER forced to suffer them.

24 posted on 05/12/2010 7:14:26 PM PDT by cricket (We ARE the Truman Show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Mrs Bush is allowed to have her own political opinions and write about them. She isn’t running for office.


25 posted on 05/12/2010 7:14:32 PM PDT by sabe@q.com (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Former school teacher?


26 posted on 05/12/2010 7:15:03 PM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson