Posted on 05/14/2010 11:46:19 AM PDT by Nachum
A key House Republican on Friday said that Attorney General Eric Holder "doesn't deserve" to keep his job because of his handling of the failed Times Square bombing attempt.
House Homeland Security Committee ranking Republican Pete King (N.Y.) said that Holder's refusal to say that radical Islam motivated the alleged attacker, Faisal Shahzad, makes him an incapable attorney general.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“House Homeland Security Committee ranking Republican Pete King (N.Y.) said that Holder’s refusal to say that radical Islam motivated the alleged attacker, Faisal Shahzad, makes him an incapable attorney general.”
And no US Attorney General will be allowed to say that, as long as there is a muslim in the White Hut.
He doesn’t deserve to be AJ after admitting he hasn’t even read the AZ immigration law he has been speaking out against. That is just embarassing. The law isn’t even that long.
I was just going to say that King reached down and discovered he had a pair, now who will follow him is the question.
Response: That was obvious from the beginning. However, he is what results from electoral pathology.
“Republican: Holder ‘doesn’t deserve to be attorney general”
That’s because he’s a dumb f**k. How this jackass ever got a law degree is beyond me.
Whom do you think Obama should have nominated, for attorney general? I think that he should have chosen Richard Bryan. He’s a moderate Democrat who was Nevada attorney general, 1979-1983; Governor of Nevada, 1983-1989; and U.S. senator, 1989-2001.
Whenever his credentials are questioned, just think of the Marc Rich pardon.
He didnt deserve to be AG after the Black Panther episode on election day.
Our AG is a racist. He allowed white voters to be intimadated at the polls by the New Black Panther party holding billyclubs. That to me is as bad as the klan waiting at polling stations in black neighborhoods years ago! He should resign.
Definately an AA student.
Right. He said he’s going to take an evening to read the 10-page bill. The sad thing is that it’ll probably take him that the whole evening; he’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
holder will not admit that radical islam is at war with us because he and his former law firm have represented them in court. Doesn’t want to pollute the well for his future clients, muslim monsters who want to attack this country. Hey holder, who are you loyal to, this country or your islamic monster clients?
He doesn’t deserve to be AG after dismissing the voter intimidation case in PA.
He got his law degree because denying it to him would have been racist.
Um, Obozo doesn’t deserve to be POTUS (or, TOTUS, actually). From him down the government needs changing. Holder is just one cog in the machinery of this failed administration.
I don’t think Obozo should have (or be) nominating anyone for any cabinet position - he doesn’t deserve to be POTUS (TOTUS).
Every time I hear Eric Holder’s name I think of Ron Brown. I’m not quite sure why but he always comes to mind.
Oh hell. Name one person in this administration who is qualified (real world qualified, not “academically eligible”) to be in their current position.
Maybe Biden. He is a dunce, and being a dunce as a VEEP is, historically, okay. (John Adams said about it “My country has, in its wisdom, contrived for me the most insignificant office ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived”). Dick Cheney was the exception to the rule: VEEPs are ornaments, by and large. So Biden is qualified to stand around and grin.
Who else? Hitlery as Sec State? Please. Gates? ha. Geithner?? double ha.
Certainly the head dummy isn’t qualified—but that doesn’t stop the Cult from worshipping him. The cult is deep in his base of voters, and it is CERTAINLY deep in the media (national and local tv “news” as well as the publishing industry.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.