Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MONDAY: President will sign 'Freedom of Press Act'
Drudge Report ^ | 5-16-10 | Breaking on Drudge

Posted on 05/16/2010 6:49:09 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron

MONDAY: President will sign 'Freedom of Press Act' in Oval Office. The signing will be pooled press... Developing...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: danielpearl; freedomofpress; obama; pearl; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100 next last
No details, developing story on Drudge.

I don't know what to make of this except it stinks to high heaven.

Anyone have any insight?

1 posted on 05/16/2010 6:49:09 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

.
Agreed that it stinks to high heaven.


2 posted on 05/16/2010 6:50:31 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Is this where “bloggers” are not protected as journalists?


3 posted on 05/16/2010 6:50:43 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Huh? Since everything Bambi says means exactly its opposite, I’d say that Monday is the end of the First Amendment.


4 posted on 05/16/2010 6:50:57 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

The title of the act is probably exactly the opposite content of the plain reading of its title.


5 posted on 05/16/2010 6:51:10 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Why does there need to be a Freedom of Press Act when the First Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America seems to cover everything that needs to be said?

Unless of course, as I suspect, the Freedom of Press Act deliniates exactly what Freedoms the Press should expect to be curtailed.

6 posted on 05/16/2010 6:51:53 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Freedom for “the” government to PRESS their boot on the neck of others?????


7 posted on 05/16/2010 6:52:04 PM PDT by IrishPennant (If you can accept losing, you can't win. ~ Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I think ‘no details’ spells it out.


8 posted on 05/16/2010 6:53:36 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

This will a carefully controlled obamma press event.


9 posted on 05/16/2010 6:54:29 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

As of Monday, I’d say freedom of the press will be a thing of the past.


10 posted on 05/16/2010 6:54:39 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Barf alert!!!


11 posted on 05/16/2010 6:55:08 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Another 0rwellian name from the Democrats.
I believe it is a “bailout” (buyout) of the news media.
The formerly free press will now be a government run propaganda machine.


12 posted on 05/16/2010 6:55:14 PM PDT by counterpunch (GOP: Government's Other Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat; All

Damn, this is a night mare turning into realilty.

I hope my other ones don’t come true, I’m sure we all have the same ones.

Just damn.


13 posted on 05/16/2010 6:55:22 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; All

From JTA:

LOS ANGELES (JTA) — President Obama will sign the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act into law, joined by six members and three generations of the slain journalist’s family.

The act, named in honor of the Wall Street Journal reporter kidnapped and decapitated by Islamic extremists in Pakistan in 2002, expands the examination of press freedom worldwide in the U.S. State Department’s annual human rights report. It will be signed into law Monday morning.

“Violators of press freedom throughout the world now know that they will be closely watched,” Pearl’s father, Judea, said before leaving Los Angeles for Washington. “This is something our son Danny fought for all his life.”

Also participating in the White House ceremony will be Pearl’s widow, Mariane, and their son, Adam Daniel, who will mark his eighth birthday on May 28; his mother, Ruth; and sisters Michelle and Tamara.

Adam was born three months after the killing of his father, while the reporter was pursuing an investigative story on the al-Qaida financial network.

The new law mandates the State Department to identify countries in which there are violations of press freedom; determine whether the government authorities of those countries participate in, facilitate or condone the violations; and report the actions these governments have taken to preserve the safety and independence of the media and ensure the prosecution of those who attack or murder journalists.


14 posted on 05/16/2010 6:55:23 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Obama White House=Tammany Hall on the National Mall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Link to another thread, with a link to the text of the bill. Also on JPost

“Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act to be law (Obama to sign—also on Drudge)”
JTA ^ | 16 May 2010 | Unknown

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2514822/posts


15 posted on 05/16/2010 6:55:50 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Since we haven’t heard a damned thing about this, may we assume that it’s another Obama Executive Order?

“Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kind of cool!”


16 posted on 05/16/2010 6:56:05 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

What do you mean?


17 posted on 05/16/2010 6:56:09 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
here's much more on this...new law.

Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act to be law

"...The act...expands the examination of press freedom worldwide in the U.S. State Department’s annual human rights report. It will be signed into law Monday morning."

Just as we suspected.

18 posted on 05/16/2010 6:58:28 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

What ever moron.


19 posted on 05/16/2010 6:58:44 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Another clever use of semantics?

Information is distracting, you know (or so the leader says)! Especially if it can lead you directly to all the Founders' words and ideas of liberty so carefully censored from the nation's textbooks.

Exposure to the ideas of 1776 and 1787 would be especially "distracting," because you might become less "dumbed down" and actually recognize tyranny when it is at your door.

20 posted on 05/16/2010 6:59:30 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; tcrlaf

Thanks for the additional info.

This guy think he’s dictator of the world now?

It’s worse than I thought, Lord have mercy.


21 posted on 05/16/2010 6:59:38 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
The new law mandates the State Department to identify countries in which there are violations of press freedom; determine whether the government authorities of those countries participate in, facilitate or condone the violations; and report the actions these governments have taken to preserve the safety and independence of the media and ensure the prosecution of those who attack or murder journalists.

Hmmm. Well, since this would include every country Obama loves, ranging from ME monarchies or dictatorships to African thugocracies to Latin American Bolivarian Paradises, I'm not sure exactly how it's going to apply to anybody.

22 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:11 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Another 0rwellian name from the Democrats. I believe it is a “bailout” (buyout) of the news media. The formerly free press will now be a government run propaganda machine.

And we will detect the difference -- how?

They've been playing the Monica position for so long they know nothing else...

23 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:33 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Assume its BAD. Real BAD. We don’t need no stinking freaking “freedom of press act”’s. We have the CONSTITUTION.


24 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:40 PM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

WTH is your problem?


25 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:41 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Washington legislation always has a name that is the exact opposite of what it does.
26 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; livius; dynachrome; Bloody Sam Roberts; SERKIT

Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act to be law
May 16, 2010

LOS ANGELES (JTA) — President Obama will sign the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act into law, joined by six members and three generations of the slain journalist’s family.

...

“Violators of press freedom throughout the world now know that they will be closely watched,” Pearl’s father, Judea, said before leaving Los Angeles for Washington. “This is something our son Danny fought for all his life.”

...

The new law mandates the State Department to identify countries in which there are violations of press freedom; determine whether the government authorities of those countries participate in, facilitate or condone the violations; and report the actions these governments have taken to preserve the safety and independence of the media and ensure the prosecution of those who attack or murder journalists.

...

“In many parts of the world, the freedom of the press is the last – or even the only – safeguard against the complete erosion of all human rights,” Dodd said. “With this bill, we pay tribute to Daniel’s life and his work by shedding a bright light on this repression, and hope to prevent this sort of tragedy from ever happening again.”

http://jta.org/news/article/2010/05/16/2394822/daniel-pearl-freedom-of-the-press-act-to-become-law


27 posted on 05/16/2010 7:00:52 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Unless of course, as I suspect, the Freedom of Press Act deliniates exactly what Freedoms the Press should expect to be curtailed.

Ding, give a pretzel with extree mustard to the cynical 'Merican in the back - then taze him, get his ID and insert an RFID chip.

28 posted on 05/16/2010 7:01:17 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I hope they make a good hive and produce maximum honey, there how is that.


29 posted on 05/16/2010 7:01:18 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa
Well, well.....both of us are getting a heads up on Monday's news without having to stay up late.

Put the 1st Amendment on your evening's reading list....and especially the part in the Constitution where it's said 'Congress shall make no laws'.
30 posted on 05/16/2010 7:02:05 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Assume its BAD. Real BAD.

I always do with this guy in charge.

What's up with the poster up thread calling me a moron?

Did I miss something?

31 posted on 05/16/2010 7:03:13 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Party on. However, the chip will need to be inserted in my dead body after the dude with the taser gets a taste of my blade.


32 posted on 05/16/2010 7:03:21 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat
Agreed that it stinks to high heaven.

Yup. Some orwellian named legislation designed to clamp down on those pesky freedoms that threaten the fledgling dictatorship.
33 posted on 05/16/2010 7:04:21 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Who knows maybe just a little hyper excuse the moron comment I’ve been here too long to give a, well you know the rest.


34 posted on 05/16/2010 7:04:44 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

The difference is they will be like the Post Office, no longer having to worry about turning a profit.
So they will only need to serve 0bama’s interests, not the public’s.


35 posted on 05/16/2010 7:04:56 PM PDT by counterpunch (GOP: Government's Other Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat
I get concerned when Barry shows interest in "free speech".

The word "restrictions" sounds bad, like a leather restraint, but Mizz Kagan's "redistribution of speech" can sound benign, like free cheese. Who doesn't like cheese?

36 posted on 05/16/2010 7:05:19 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
I hope they make a good hive and produce maximum honey, there how is that.

Whatever, where do you get off name calling when someone asks you what you mean by your rather less then detailed post?

37 posted on 05/16/2010 7:05:48 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
Thanks for the heads-up, Biglook! More evil from this disastrous regime - subverting and destroying all that is good in America!

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
38 posted on 05/16/2010 7:06:38 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

OK then.

Imagine whirled bees.


39 posted on 05/16/2010 7:06:40 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat

It’s the Daniel Pearl Act, but it doesn’t mention radical Islam. Another feel good bill that does nothing to address the root of the problem.


40 posted on 05/16/2010 7:08:20 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

(That was a reference to the story about the 1000s of bees that swarmed 0bama & the White House today).

I want a commemorative photo myself. That would be worth cash money. Well, even though cash money isn’t what it was in 2007.


41 posted on 05/16/2010 7:08:35 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Who knows maybe just a little hyper excuse the moron comment I’ve been here too long to give a, well you know the rest.

Good, let me know when you're adult enough to offer an apologie.

Until then you can KMA

42 posted on 05/16/2010 7:09:03 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

dork.


43 posted on 05/16/2010 7:09:18 PM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Redefining interpretation of the 1st Amendment?


44 posted on 05/16/2010 7:09:31 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
The new law mandates the State Department to identify countries in which there are violations of press freedom;...

In other words, it's a useless piece of "feel good" legislation -- designed solely for show.

Hugo and Mahmoud, et al, I'm sure, are enjoying a good laugh over this preening and posturing.

45 posted on 05/16/2010 7:10:04 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Danae

your ass


46 posted on 05/16/2010 7:10:25 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Beats the heck outta me.


47 posted on 05/16/2010 7:10:56 PM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

...is quite nice thanks for asking.


48 posted on 05/16/2010 7:11:20 PM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I agree that the legislation text appears to be inane, feel good stuff, but it does make you wonder about implications.

It’s like the WH is a hive now, what with its own press production & video (with help from the Oprah). It’s like they’re trying to redefine what freedom is and what it means—akin to ‘transparency.’


49 posted on 05/16/2010 7:11:58 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Is this where “bloggers” are not protected as journalists?

Journalists should not be protected as journalists. The whole notion is another made up "right" of the left. Yes, journalists and anybody has the right to publish anything political that they want. But they certainly don't have any superior rights than mine because they work for the NY Times. Specifically, they do not have any right to silence in any legal proceeding other than those that we all are supposed to have.

ML/NJ

50 posted on 05/16/2010 7:12:13 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson