Ft. Hood: US Soldier Will Sue Military for Not Stopping Anti-Muslim Harassment

www.breitbart.tv ^ | 5/18/2010

[La Enchiladita]

Wow, who spiked your Kool-aid?
I have a better idea: YOU go live in a muslim country and report on the success of conservatism there.

[ETL]

I’d like to sue the government for NOT harassing muslims in the military.

Muslims who say the sort of things this one did should definitely be 'harassed' and then some, as should anyone rooting for the enemy to win and advocating terror attacks against Americans.

See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2516091/posts?page=13#13

[ilovesarah2012]

Apparently. I was working and just switched over to FR and glanced at the headline. Dang, I sound just like Holder!

[OldDeckHand]

"Most likely a branch of the ACLU. "

It's actually a stand-alone 501c3 that was started by a former Air Force JAG, named Mickey Wienstien (sp?). He's a Jew, who also happens to be an atheist. He cut his teeth suing the Air Force Academy (after he left the service), for alleging the proselytizing of recruits and cadets.

You might remember that the AF Academy was forced to construct an outdoor Wiccan "temple". I believe that was as a rusult of an action filed (in part) by this particular foundation.

[La Enchiladita]

You might remember that the AF Academy was forced to construct an outdoor Wiccan "temple".

I remember. Ridiculous beyond belief. Might as well build a statue of Judy Tenuta, in honor of "Judy-ism."

[ronniesgal]

hear, hear!

[Arrowhead1952]

Well, we had a number of muSLIMES leave during the first Iraq war and more after the second started.

[ArmyTeach]

Experience over the last decade or more makes it obvious that violence engrained in the Muslim culture. I cannot think of anywhere that a Muslim popultion lives in harmony with its neighbors. Those who don't themselves commit acts of violence (jihad) either actively or passively support those who do. Therefore violence is a Muslim/Islamic problem and it is the responsibity of the practicioners of Islam to solve that problem. As they seem to have no intention of doing so, they make it our problem to solve, which leaves them with no grounds for complaint. Just my take...

[Churchillspirit]

Poor baby!

[hondact200]

how about a little cheese with the whine. Poor muslim baby, he needs his nappy changed. The US Military is purely voluntary, so he is getting some harassment for being a Muslim. “Tough Teaty said the kitty because the milk was sour.”. More political correctness. More Bullshit, Cowshit, Horseshit, Pigshit, Beavershit and so on and so forth. Plain and simple more excrement coming from a whiner. Put him on the frontlines and than pull back. Semper Fi. The mIlitary is to build men except for those whom are women than it builds women. All whiners are just a bunch of wimpy wimps

[itsahoot]

Those moslems are disgusting animals, as they PROVE every hour of every day.

Remember, we had Muslims in the FBI, that refused to investigate other Muslims after 911.

[Ready4Freddy]

The group that is helping him, The Military Religious Freedom Foundation, has been behind a number of fairly high-profile suits against various military branches ...

They lead the charge in re: the Trijicon scopes with Biblical verses in the SNs.

[oneamericanvoice]

That Specialist sure has cojones! Go get ‘em!

[Ready4Freddy]

He knows that there's nothing more that the Army can do, so it's all about the benjamins.

If he were smart he'd get out now. He's a marked man.

[HKMk23]

Wait. Did you read ALL of what I posted, or just some of it? I think you may have misunderstood me.

Don’t you think the Army’s tolerance of Maj. Hasan’s venomous diatribes was a problem?

Don’t you think the Army should have actively dealt with Hasan BEFORE he started shooting people?

Don’t you think that the Army’s tolerance of Maj. Hasan’s expressed opinions enabled him to do what he did?

Don’t you think that the Army FAILED w/resp to its handling of Maj. Hasan in light of his KNOWN anti-American sentiments?

Don’t you think the Army needs changing w/resp to how militant Muslims in uniform are being handled, and future on-base shootings might be prevented?

See, I think that you and I would answer all of those questions pretty much the same way:

I DO think the Army’s tolerance of Maj. Hasan’s venomous diatribes was a problem.

I DO think the Army should have actively dealt with Hasan BEFORE he started shooting people.

I DO think that the Army’s tolerance of Maj. Hasan’s expressed opinions enabled him to do what he did.

I DO think that the Army FAILED w/resp to its handling of Maj. Hasan in light of his KNOWN anti-American sentiments.

I DO think the Army needs changing w/resp to how militant Muslims in uniform are being handled, and future on-base shootings might be prevented.

I would have expected that you would think likewise about most all of those things. So, do we or don’t we have a shared perspective here, and — if not — where do we differ?

[happygrl]

It’s nice that you love Sarah, but you have entirely missed the point of the article.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

I didn’t think this was legal. I thought that you signed away all your rights when you joined the military, and as long as you are military property, you can’t sue the US government for pain, suffering, physical damage or any other thing. You are pretty much SOL.

[DejaJude]

I was kinda on his side up until he stated that he felt compelled by his commanding officer to move off base. That person stated he offered many options for him and he opted for off base. Seems more whiny than true.

[DejaJude]

Might as well build a statue of Judy Tenuta, in honor of "Judy-ism."

Since my name is Judy, I'm all for that. ;-)

[Taxman]

Get all Moslems out of America!