Posted on 05/19/2010 5:21:52 PM PDT by Kaslin
Eric must go with the rest of the commies.
bump
blog:
http://pajamasmedia.com/files/2010/07/Affidavit-of-Hans-von-Spakovsky.pdf
#
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/affidavit-of-former-fec-commissioner-hans-von-spakovsky/
“Former DOJ Colleagues Confirm Whistleblower Adams’ Accusations”
SNIPPET: “Sworn affidavits from Hans A. von Spakovsky and Karl Bowers, who worked with J. Christian Adams in the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, offer broad confirmation of the whistleblower’s accusations of bias in enforcing voting rights.”
July 15, 2010
blog:
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/
“Smearing J. Christian Adams”
By Michelle Malkin • July 26, 2010 11:50 AM
Quote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2605659/posts
EDITORIAL: No black hole for Black Panthers—Attorney General Holder can’t hide testimony forever
The Washington Times ^ | October 11, 2010 | Editorial
Posted on October 11, 2010 5:14:33 PM PDT by jazusamo
The Obama Justice Department can put an end to the scandal surrounding the New Black Panther voter-intimidation case. All Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. would have to do is allow members of his Voting Rights Section to answer a few simple questions under oath, without waiving a single legal privilege.
On Friday, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights approved two letters to Mr. Holder. Both ask, again, for more cooperation than the Justice Department has provided for 16 months. The commission is seeking information about an alleged “broad culture of hostility to race-neutral enforcement of the civil rights laws; a pattern of harassment and intimidation against those who work on suits in which the defendants are racial minorities; and instructions from a political appointee that basic voting rights laws will not be enforced against racial minorities during this administration.”
On the Black Panther case, the department has made stunningly expansive claims that a “deliberative process” privilege obviates the need for a transparent administration, but “instructions from a political appointee” carry no such privilege. They don’t involve discussions about how and whether to prosecute specific cases but instead pertain to broad policy pronouncements. No valid legal argument could claim such policy choices are exempt from disclosure to an independent commission, Congress or the public.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.