Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daley: City anticipating overturn of gun ban
abclocal ^ | 5/19/10 | Paul Meincke

Posted on 05/20/2010 12:35:55 AM PDT by smokingfrog

Within the next five weeks the United States Supreme Court will rule on a challenge to Chicago's 28-year-old ban on handguns. It's believed the court will rule that the law is unconstitutional. ABC 7's Paul Meincke talked with Mayor Richard Daley about what the city might do next.

Conventional wisdom is that the handgun ban will not pass constitutional muster. Mindful of that, the city has been -- for some time now -- formulating plans on what it does next. The mayor says there are plans in place still being refined. But a strong hint of what Chicago will do requires only a look at the nation's capital.

Two years ago, the Supreme Court declared Washington DC's handgun ban unconstitutional, saying that residents have a 2nd Amendment right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defense. But the court also said that right is not unlimited and local governments are free to enact reasonable gun regulation.

"We'll be looking at local ordinances. We'll have to wait for the decision to come down and what they will say in the decision," said Mayor Daley.

What Chicago does may be patterned after what Washington DC has already done. Its new gun control laws -- now a year old -- say that prospective handgun owners must register their guns after undergoing more extensive background checks, including giving fingerprints and photographs.

The gun they buy must first be given to police for ballistics identification. An owner must complete a training course -- four hours in the classroom, one on a gun range. And, among other restrictions, you can register no more than one gun a month, and you must undergo background checks every six years.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunban; mcdonald

1 posted on 05/20/2010 12:35:55 AM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

SCOTUS needs to cut the crap and put firm limits on “reasonable”. They are playing games with this issue.


2 posted on 05/20/2010 12:49:25 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

This is why the idiot now up for nomination should not get nominated. Notice the time date. Around time she would be or not be confirmed.

Get rid of Obama now before his term is up.


3 posted on 05/20/2010 2:15:25 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

The Supreme Court case may not determine anything other than lip service just like Heller. I would like to think McDonald would help to overturn 20,000 gun laws but I think it’s too much to hope for. Not when we have a turncoat gun group like the goa which asked for the narrow view on Heller.


4 posted on 05/20/2010 4:03:27 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
so 'dick' is honest for a change, basically saying that they are already lookin at every angle to circumvent the law, just need to parse the language...

criminals, the lot of em...

need a NYSE pick for rope futures...

5 posted on 05/20/2010 4:34:47 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

Chicago is a septic tank of politicians. As is Washington D.C.


6 posted on 05/20/2010 4:50:26 AM PDT by chainsaw ( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Constitution?
Constitution be damned.
We don need no constitution.
We needs to control compliant citizans.


7 posted on 05/20/2010 5:36:04 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (Just say NO to RINOs. (FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

>Constitution?
>Constitution be damned.
>We don need no constitution.
>We needs to control compliant citizens.

On that note:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2513906/posts


8 posted on 05/20/2010 6:54:56 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Chicago criminals are afraid.

is this bad somehow?


9 posted on 05/20/2010 9:01:34 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Insurance to exercise a right? LOL!


10 posted on 05/20/2010 11:05:08 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson