Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather; steelyourfaith

Funny, I’ve been posting this stuff for a while now with little or no comments.

Opportunities to attend or send letters on the public comment periods for all these “rule changes.” This isn’t happening overnight folks, the pawns have been in place for well over a year to do these things. It is part of the reason they can be lax over the Cap N Tax bill, industry is getting slammed with it anyway....

EPA Sets Thresholds for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements

Senators Kerry and Lieberman Introduce American Power Act

Canada, Mexico, and U.S. Collaborate to Further Reduce and Replace HFCs

Sale of Chicago Climate Exchange to ICE Reinforces Weak Carbon Market

Scientists Outline Strategy to Limit Global Warming

Legislative Hearing on Clean Energy Policies that Reduce U.S. Dependence on Oil from Lisa Jackson

Court Says Coal- and Oil-fired Power Plants Will Lose Bush-era Exemption

New Stringent Appliance Standards for Home Water Heaters and Other Heating Products

Many of the new “standards and rules” do not require anything to go through congress. Congress gave these agencies all this authority in many of the existing legislative acts.

23 posted on 05/21/2010 4:12:15 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH; Libloather
"with little or no comment"

Let me comment.

Your first link in #23 accurately says that EPA will tailor, or set, the regulatory threshold at 75,000 and 100,000 tons, depending on existing or new facilities.

Previously, EPA said that they would tailor, or set, the threshold at 25,000 tons.

So why did they change it?

Because, as EPA said, "they are trying to stay out of the way of Congress". Stated another way, EPA is setting their their regulatory threshold to be less stringent than what Congress is proposing.

When the prevailing legislation was the House cap and trade legislation, EPA set their threshold at 25,000 tons so that it was less stringent than the legislation.

Then the House cap and trade legislation fell by the way side, and Kerry-Lieberman became the prevailing legislation and this was less stringent than the House bill, so EPA had to raise their reg threshold so it was less stringent than Kerry-Lieberman.

29 posted on 05/21/2010 5:24:29 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


You missed the regulations dealing with lead painted homes, that the EPA now requires dealing with as if they will destroy the planet.

36 posted on 05/21/2010 12:55:33 PM PDT by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson