Yes. My priorities:
Where the flaming incompetent, US-worker hating Carly FioRINO falls in there, I'm not sure.
Your response regarding Fiorina illustrates exactly what the Boxer campaign against her will involve.
I’ve debated a few FReepers here about the incompetence of Sarah Palin meddling in our primary. They seemed to buy in somehow that Fiorina would be the strongest candidate against Boxer. Nothing could be further from the truth. Fiorina is the weakest of the 3 in a head to head agAinst Boxer. Why don’t Republicans ever get it, that being a job killing corporate CEO is NOT an asset in any election, especially one in the height of a deep recession and record unemployment.
Fiorina is exactly the kind of candidate Boxer wants to run against. Fiorina’s background is the one lifeline Boxer has to change the subject to one that is favorable to Boxer. Fiorina’s job killing tenure at HP is just the distraction Boxer needs to keep her own job.
> Where the flaming incompetent, US-worker hating Carly FioRINO falls in there, I’m not sure.
So much this. To think that I could be pulling the lever for her or it’s Boxer again makes me throw up in my mouth. A lot.
For the record, the people that know her work best in Silicon Valley (yes, including Rock Ribbed Conservatives) hate... yes, HAAAATE FIORINO. Read it and weep for California:
http://www.redstate.com/erick/files/2010/03/packardletter.pdf
“Where the flaming incompetent, US-worker hating Carly FioRINO falls in there, I’m not sure.”
2. Liberal Republican lose;