Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthkeeper

Well hey you know the media wouldn’t have let anyone know anyway! So why do people persist in claiming he never defended himself? A number of times that I remember him telling people why he did/didn’t do something, and the only people interested in reporting it were the few in the media who were sympathetic to him! Most the media was apathetic, if not hostile!

How did you expect most people to hear anything he had to say on his behalf, unless they watched/listened those few sources? Then if he had done it more, he would’ve looked like a cry-baby (like someone we all know). Then he would’ve looked weak! Also, would anyone expect him to get anything done if he was always sitting around, trying to defend himself?


63 posted on 05/26/2010 9:37:56 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: dsutah
Sorry, but I don't agree at. Aren't YOU able to defend YOUR stands and principles without sounding like a "crybaby?" How about Ronald Reagan, he certainly was able to smack down the press, and God knows he was hated by them, and loved by the people for it. Instead we have had either no response or been stuck with milktoast "New Toners" like Dana Perino et al.

Put me on the Chris Christie bandwagon. A man who can defend himself, his policies and principles, and conservative principles with vigor, clarity, coherence, and strength.

How utterly REFRESHING.

68 posted on 05/27/2010 6:44:12 AM PDT by truthkeeper ( Remember in November: VOTE THE BUMS OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson