Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea Deploys Mortars and Multiple Rocket Launchers at Sino-NK border
Yonhap News ^ | 05/26/10 | Cha Dae-un

Posted on 05/26/2010 7:42:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my summary

N. Korea Deploys Mortars and Multiple Rocket Launchers at Sino-NK border


122mm multiple rocket launcher, the same type N. Korea deployed at the border area.

N. Korea deployed 82mm mortars to border guard units.

Each border guard company now has a fire support platoon equipped with 82mm mortars. Each platoon has at least 4 mortars. The process started in February and is now complete.

Border guard units used to be armed only with light weapons such as rifles because their main mission is to deter people from illegal entry to or escape from N. Korea.

Border guard units now have firepower equal to regular infantry units.

The explanation N. Korean authorities gave (to its population or soldiers) is that it was for deterring invasion by S. Korean commandos through China.

Radio Free Asia also reported on May 26 that mortars, recoilless rifles, and machine guns were deployed to border guard units.

/end my summary


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; conflict; heavyweapons; nkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Kartographer

>> Kim Jong-il is dying and he is crazy, so I say he plans to turn North Korea in to one he77 of a funeral fire!

Yeah, the reality of the situation could be a high-stakes game of Risk between four or five bright, resourceful players...

... or it could be every bit as simple and stupid as you suggest.


21 posted on 05/26/2010 8:02:17 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
As for MRL deployment, I forgot to add that they deployed brigade-size MRL unit at the border area.
22 posted on 05/26/2010 8:02:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Nork hardware always looks like a 1950s museum.


23 posted on 05/26/2010 8:05:02 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

In other news the suspicion that NK is about to collapse, could be another reason for guns pointed north.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2521483/posts


24 posted on 05/26/2010 8:07:07 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (Where is the Black Regiment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

” Nork hardware always looks like a 1950s museum. “

Don’t worry - that explosive warhead going off won’t hurt you, since it’s old technology??


25 posted on 05/26/2010 8:08:23 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
The whole country is a vintage Stalinist state circa late 1940's and 50's. After Stalin's death, everybody else moved on. Except N. Korea.

In some specialized niche, their military do keep pace with the rest of the world, as they have shown in Cheonan incident.

26 posted on 05/26/2010 8:08:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
No a match for this MLRS
27 posted on 05/26/2010 8:08:42 AM PDT by Nashvegas (What do you get if you offer a liberal a penny for their thoughts? Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

A man with the ego of Kim Jong-il can’t die a regular death he needs to leave a mark that everyone will remember and he needs to make sure that there are a lot of ‘dogs’ at his feet when he goes. I would say as far as his own people he believes that they are better off dead than living on without him.

This is the same ego that ‘Zero’ has and that is one of the things that scare me the most about him!


28 posted on 05/26/2010 8:09:11 AM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
The United States and Japan would never accept a United Korea as a Chinese satellite state.

Nor, I should add, would the South Koreans.

Koreans hate everybody. For good reason, I should add. However, one can see a deal among the major powers of the 1950-53 war in which the U.S. withdraws its troops and forgoes its Security Treaty in the South in exchange for the Chicoms doing Same Same with the North in exchange for Unification and Neutrality under the Southern Flag and Constitution.

The backroom deal would be the generous trade concessions that Chinese companies would receive and the Free Trade Zone that would be set up to benefit Manchukuo Manchuria.

The strategic benefit gained by the Chinese in allowing a proliferator State to exist were clear: nuclear weapons from the DPRK and Iran could go out into the world from Iran and North Korea and China's hidden hand could never be detected. If an American city were destroyed, too bad, so sad.

Now the Chinese may have decided that it is better to make money than to kill Americans.

29 posted on 05/26/2010 8:09:40 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
The Chinese problem created by a rogue NK is more complex than your statement recognizes.

For starters, there is the Korean Autonomous region of Yan bian which lies within China's borders and shares a border with NK. The population (2.1 million) is over 95% ethnic Korean. A Korean peninsula war would send millions of impoverished refugees north across the Yalu and into China by way of Yan bian.

30 posted on 05/26/2010 8:09:54 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

My guess: Chia Head wants a war to get more materiel and food from China, and to solidify the NK army behind his son. So he sank the Cheosan to start tensions. But he forgot to ask Beijing.

Beijing summoned him to “discuss” his action. Chia Head went to Beijing a few weeks ago to ask the powers that be for forgiveness, and to beg for money and food and approval of his 3rd son to avoid a war or coup. Beijing said no. Now Chia Head has decided to attack South Korea to try to get what he wants.

Chia Head knows Beijing will pour over the border to take the nuclear facilities, the northern 200 km of North Korea, and to stop his war. But it will take a few days. Adding a few more weapons at that border may buy Chia Head another day. He’s hoping that will give him enough time to capture most of South Korea (and conveniently eliminate 4 of the top 5 generals of the NK army) and then sue for a truce.

China’s learned that peace pays off a lot better than war. They want no part of it. I won’t be surprised to find Chinese troops and materiel deployed to the border.


31 posted on 05/26/2010 8:09:58 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

>> The Chinese problem created by a rogue NK is more complex than your statement recognizes. &etc

No doubt it is. Sounds like you know what you’re talking about. Thanks for the additional info.

How do you think China will handle their client state?


32 posted on 05/26/2010 8:12:35 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
If China were to play this right, they could easily pull South Korea into their sphere of influence by immediately working towards reunification. All they would have to say is “Move the U.S. off your soil and we can start to put Korea back together”

_________________________________________________

This statement indicates a distinct lack of understanding of the South Koreans.

33 posted on 05/26/2010 8:12:55 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
How do you think China will handle their client state?

____________________________________

IMO? They would seal the border, cut off all food and fuel assistance, wait for an implosion then pick up the pieces.

The real question is...What would China do if ROK, either as an offensive strike or a defensive reaction, ended up occupying Pyongyang?

Just how far would they go in response?

One possibility....let ROK go broke feeding its northern cousins.

34 posted on 05/26/2010 8:17:35 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Norks are picking a fight with CHINA?! They are truly INSANE.

But that’s not really news, is it?


35 posted on 05/26/2010 8:18:14 AM PDT by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

At what point, if any, do you think DPRK would use, or attempt to use, their nuclear weapon(s)?


36 posted on 05/26/2010 8:19:38 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pete
But if NK is trying to repel China on the North and defending against SK/US on the South then this isn’t your grandfather’s Korean War.

No, it's not. It is, rather, the thrashing about of a paranoid, dying, and insane regime.

37 posted on 05/26/2010 8:20:35 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

He will be forgotten in Hell.


38 posted on 05/26/2010 8:22:26 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

The older generation would be opposed, but many of the young generation of South Koreans are in favor of reunification at any cost.


39 posted on 05/26/2010 8:22:31 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
At what point, if any, do you think DPRK would use, or attempt to use, their nuclear weapon(s)?

Anyone know the general consensus on what nukes the norks might have? How many, yield, etc?
40 posted on 05/26/2010 8:23:24 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson