Why should I? I never doubted that he had.
You are overlooking the possibility that the punk wants to adorn himself in gang bling. His brother's death provides the plausible excuse for what he wants to do anyway, I am guessing. That why I called it a pretext, OK?
You like to jump to conclusions, don't you? Lots of them. I'd say you're the one indulging in bluster.
By your own admission you zero basis of accusing the kid of wanting to wear gang bling. You were guessing. And what you were saying does not square with either this article nor the kid passing whatever vetting process the chrisian legal shows use before they had him on radio.
I had a basis for my statement.
I am waiting to see what you come up with for how making baseless accusations squares with Catholicism.