Posted on 05/27/2010 6:02:50 PM PDT by ETL
Yes, O’reilly is a “goldbelt” buffoon.
0’pinhead, long-legged, bigmouth hack daddy!
As large as their egos are, who really notices the “research” on either BOR’s or Beck’s shows—??
To show he is “fair and balanced” BOR equates good with evil. He also seems to know what evil the left is capable of and is afraidand seems to position himself to switch sides. Beck stands up to the evil and calls it by what it is.
Ridiculous. BOR has the worst research of any show on FOX. You can send him solid sourced information and he will still go on spouting some idiocy on a given topic.
Sounds like someone else we know.
I agree.
There is absolutely no comparison between the quantity and quality of their information. Beck, although admittedly 'new' at it, runs rings around O'Reilly. He exposes *details* of the movement, the individuals, the connections, the ideology. O'Reilly doesn't know squat about the commie left. He doesn't even take them seriously. Yet they have taken the White House!
LOL...
OReilly has taking up spinning yarns over spinning stories.
The segment with Beck is coming up on the re-airing sometime in the next 5-20 mins here in New York City. Check your local listings for re-airings where you are, if you missed it earlier.
I appreciate the suggestion...but I don't want to kick my son off the xbox to watch O'Reilly...BOR is such an idiot...I'd rather not let my son see me watching that level of idiocy.
Lol! I hear you!
The part with Beck is coming up after the commercial break (about halfway through the show).
O’Reillys an ass. He also has to pay heed to the Saudi scum who own part of Fox.
O’Reilly is a punk. I never watch the jerk.
O’Reilly is a pinhead who bloviates beyond the point of interest for most.
What FOX really needs is some serious competition. Why not have Rush and some others get together and simply buy MSNBC? I understand it’s not long for the world.
"Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal".--James (Jim) Cone,
African American Religious Thought: An Anthology (Paperback)
by Cornel West (Editor), Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (Editor)
SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"
WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.
HANNITY: But I'm a reverend
WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354158,00.html
____________________________________________
Obama's Church: Gospel of Hate
Kathy Shaidle, FrontPageMag.com
Monday, April 07, 2008
In March of 2007, FOX News host Sean Hannity had engaged Obamas pastor in a heated interview about his Churchs teachings. For many viewers, the ensuing shouting match was their first exposure to "Black Liberation Theology"...
Like the pro-communist Liberation Theology that swept Central America in the 1980s and was repeatedly condemned by Pope John Paul II, Black Liberation Theology combines warmed-over 1960s vintage Marxism with carefully distorted biblical passages. However, in contrast to traditional Marxism, it emphasizes race rather than class. The Christian notion of "salvation" in the afterlife is superseded by "liberation" on earth, courtesy of the establishment of a socialist utopia.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=30CD9E14-B0C9-4F8C-A0A6-A896F0F44F02
____________________________________________
Catholics for Marx [Liberation Theology]
By Fr. Robert Sirico
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, June 03, 2004
In the days when the Superpowers were locked in a Cold War, Latin America seethed with revolution, and millions lived behind an iron curtain, a group of theologians concocted a novel idea within the history of Christianity. They proposed to combine the teachings of Jesus with the teachings of Marx as a way of justifying violent revolution to overthrow the economics of capitalism.
The Gospels were re-rendered not as doctrine impacting on the human soul but rather as windows into the historical dialectic of class struggle. These "liberation theologians" saw every biblical criticism of the rich as a mandate to expropriate the expropriating owners of capital, and every expression of compassion for the poor as a call for an uprising by the proletarian class of peasants and workers.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=460782B7-35CC-4C9E-A2C5-93832067C7CD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.