Posted on 05/28/2010 10:43:44 AM PDT by Dinah Lord
“They were thinking “inter-generational sexual role mentoring”.”
Just ducky - now the lil’ snots can teach their elders how to put the condom on the cucumber, every last detail the ‘teacher’ told them about fisting, and all can play together.
What happened to “Children should be seen and not heard”?
Pervs “groom” their intended victims by getting them used to talking sex. First the talk. Then the pictures. Then a little something to help you relax. >:o/
What next, that child brides are actually self-esteem builders for little girls? That having sex when you’re nine with a guy who’s in his 30s, and has other wives, can be a good thing?
Don’t fool us you effing dog-and-pony-show ‘medical experts’. You’re just kowtowing to the muslims on this one. Let’s just call it right out in the damn open what it is. That’s exactly what it is.
Nice work by American Thinker to shine a light on these cockroaches.
I won’t ask if the same standard ought to apply to a young boy.
What I can’t figure out is who actually proposed this boneheaded, dhimmi idea in the first place?
Talk about the Muslim-Moonbat Axis of Evil! And what about the Feminazis - you didn’t hear boo out of them.
SO typical of these liberal loons.
Isn't that the truth!!!
That’s why they go into the field, they’re trying to figure themselves out.
If I remember correctly, this was suggested to encourage Muslims NOT to go with full fledged mutilation. If you want to know just how bad that can be read the book I recommend in my comment#15. They felt that if a small nick could be made (I think in the labia, not the clitoris)
this would satisfy the religious requirement as opposed to cutting out both parts completely and worse. Incidentally, in most of the world this is done in childhood usually without anesthesia. Furthermore it would be much less extensive than the circumcism that our male babies are often subjected to, with or without religious reasons, also without anesthesia.
You obiviously know nothing about FGM to say something as ignorant as that. When they circumcise a boy they don’t take the whole outer organ off like FGM usually involves. If the child is lucky all they take is her clitoris in the more severe form she is sewn shut after all is cut off. Iwas not aware that circumcision took away a males ability to enjoy sex or caused lifelong discomfort?
Agreed, but who is the perv? Given what is being taught in the schools, can we just hang the curriculum writers and the ‘teachers’?
As was said of lawyers, “It might help. It couldn’t hurt, and it might be so much fun.”
Yes, I know that the above doesn’t answer the issue of those deliberately targeting minors, but I am convinced that Chester The Molester, like homosexuals, and the poor, will always be with us.
Unlike the Regime, I do not approve of legalizing Chester, Queer Nation, and most certainly do not approve of gooberment funding of charity. As Rep. Davy Crockett said regarding government charitable activities, “It is not yours to give.”
How we teach the next generation is crucial if we are to have a Republic with an informed electorate.
Chester is less a danger than our socialism impaired school system.
God help us and America.
There is nothing 'symbolic' about the practice and for them to think they can get a Muslim - er, excuse me, culture to go along with their idea of a symbolic 'nick' is ludicrous at best.
FYI - at the risk of opening up the circumcision can of worms - here is the AAP's official statement on the topic.
The American Academy of Pediatrics believes that circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages, as well as risks. The existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision. Therefore, because the procedure is not essential to a child’s current well-being, we recommend that the decision to circumcise is one best made by parents in consultation with their pediatrician, taking into account what is in the best interests of the child, including medical, religious, cultural, and ethnic traditions.
Your pediatrician (or your obstetrician if he or she would be performing the circumcision) should discuss the benefits and risks of circumcision with you and the forms of analgesia that are available.
“Maybe the muslims need some reeducation.”
I think it is the “feminists” who need it more.
My gosh, these upper-class white people sure are afraid of the Islamo-facists, ain’t they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.