Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Source: Obama Ignorant of Sestak Bribe Attempt Until "Recent Days"
Friday, May 28, 2010 | Kristinn

Posted on 05/28/2010 7:10:02 PM PDT by kristinn

In reports that appear to have been missed in the flurry of reporting this afternoon on the Obama administration's release of a cursory report on its in-house investigation on the administration's attempted bribery of Rep. Joe Sestak, CNN's John King reported that a White House source told him Barack Obama was kept in the dark about the bribe attempt until "recent days."

Posting on Twitter around 1 p.m. EDT, King reported in three Tweets what his sources were telling him about the unfolding scandal:

WH Source: prez didnt know about rahm/clinton/sestak talks until recent days; GOP pressing for more details.

WH memo lacks important details. Source says COS Emanuel did not check with counsel office before enlisting Clinton. #sestak

Svl other WH aides knew of Emanuel/Clinton effort. WH memo doesn't mention. #sestak

King has not posted to his Twitter account since posting these three reports.

Is someone in the White House trying to create a case for Obama's innocence in the Sestak scandal? It sure looks that way. It's not credible, but it shows an acknowledgement by some in the Obama administration that Obama himself could be in serious trouble if he is found to have been involved in the Sestak bribe attempt.

This is looking more like the Watergate cover-up with each passing hour. (And we know how that ended.)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billclinton; joesestak; johnking; obama; sestak; sestakgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-179 next last
To: kristinn
"CNN's John King reported that a White House source told him Barack Obama was kept in the dark about the bribe attempt until "recent days."

So, the progressive left thinks they're going to throw Rahm and Bill under the bus?

Somebody needs to put Sestak under oath, then follow the trail.

Rahm and Bill will not go to jail to protect Obama.

121 posted on 05/28/2010 8:28:35 PM PDT by Mariner (The first Presidential candidate to call for deportation, wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

My first thought was Clinton just opened the door to the negotiations.......and rahm is guilty as sin. showerBoy is up to his scrawny little neck in this....thus he managed to hide out in Israel when the scandal broke.


122 posted on 05/28/2010 8:29:52 PM PDT by tioga (Remember in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

‘prez didnt know about rahm/clinton/sestak talks until recent days; ‘

I believe that. I sure do. The smartest president EVER didn’t know nuthin.


123 posted on 05/28/2010 8:31:20 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

The next step should be asking Gibbs during the next presser if he can state as fact there were no phone calls or emails to Sestak (or his brother, the lawyer) from the Oval Office or the office of any other WHite House Official.

Who will be the next Deep Throat?


124 posted on 05/28/2010 8:34:06 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: tioga

Clinton loves the drama and he is an accomplished wordsmith and liar. Hillary is the SoS and that doesn’t bode well at all. Clinton should have kept his nose out of it.

That’s why I tend to agree with Newt; that Clinton’s story is a diversion.

The red meat phone call came after Clinton’s.

Put Sestak under oath and ask him about the other phone calls.

He’s the weak link.


125 posted on 05/28/2010 8:34:23 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445
Just wait the next words out of O’s mouth will be executive privilege for dead fish.

Will that cover the situation in the Gulf too?

Or will that require a PDD (petroleum distraction directive).

126 posted on 05/28/2010 8:34:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I wonder what they had to give Bill to take the fall. Maybe it's the other way around.....Bill offers to help and set his good friends up for impeachment...Both BO and WJF think they are above the law.
127 posted on 05/28/2010 8:35:14 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Yes!

WHO will be the next Deep Throat?


128 posted on 05/28/2010 8:35:16 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Snort. This isn’t the Joe Sestak I knew. Does he not realize what a moron he is quickly beginning to look like?


129 posted on 05/28/2010 8:35:23 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Even more reason to get control in 2010. In January the new Congress can subpoena Sestak and place him under oath. DOJ and this Congress will continue to stonewall.

Sestak will not lie to protect Zero or Clintoon.


130 posted on 05/28/2010 8:35:56 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Eschew Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: tioga

Maybe it’s time for Rahm to take one for the boss. If it gets hot enough I’m sure he would do it, except for that pesky matter of the law.

Was a crime committed? I don’t know, but if there was a criminal violation it changes everything.

Independent Counsel anyone?


131 posted on 05/28/2010 8:36:54 PM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
This is looking more like the Watergate cover-up with each passing hour. (And we know how that ended.)

From your lips to God's ears, Mr. Taylor.

132 posted on 05/28/2010 8:37:03 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (No apologies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl

Is there a statute of limitations on any of this?


133 posted on 05/28/2010 8:37:19 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Maybe we know now why Greg Craig resigned. He was Billy’s attorney...


134 posted on 05/28/2010 8:38:58 PM PDT by sissyjane (Did you plug the hole yet Daddy????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Truth to tell, that headline has exactly 7 too many words in it.


135 posted on 05/28/2010 8:39:54 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl

Making a statement to the FBI or a grand fjury would accomplish the same thing. Wonder if the PA attorney general will get involved.


136 posted on 05/28/2010 8:41:36 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Well, when we are talking about Spector, it may only be a crime under Scottish law. What I noticed is that the “source” is admitting that this was a bribe.


137 posted on 05/28/2010 8:43:38 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: onyx

That’s a good question. Not an expert on Federal law but I’d suspect it would be more than one year. I have heard it’s a felony but haven’t researched it myself.


138 posted on 05/28/2010 8:49:25 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Eschew Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

A convicted liar is Obama's alibi!!! ROTFLMAO!!! Pass the popcorn!!!


139 posted on 05/28/2010 8:52:31 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Now we know why Rahm was shedding a tear and looking punked at the Prayer Wall in Israel....and it wasn't his son's Bar Mitzvah.

Leni

140 posted on 05/28/2010 8:52:57 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore" - 10/20/09 "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson